To: milemark
Wonder to what extent of injuries a vet from WWII had to have to get a 50% disability...
3 posted on
01/14/2004 5:50:55 AM PST by
2banana
To: 2banana
I wonder too. I've heard some stories of truly horrific wounds, crippling injuries, maimed bodies and only paltry disability awards. Not that today's vets should be treated poorly just because it has happened in the past, but I wonder if the original 30% was correct and the Army upped it to stop the screaming from jack$on and gang?
4 posted on
01/14/2004 6:03:42 AM PST by
milemark
(Alert is back to yellow. Good. I didn't have any ties that went with orange.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson