Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldFriend
If I had to guess, my assumption is that they "verified" the document as authentic, and then prefaced it with some (lightly) worded disclaimer, then run with it. (Still has legal denyability). This way, they can act surprised when the authenticated document turns up to be false.

"Honest, we didn't know that this document was fraudulent."
I bet the lawyers had their teeth in it before anything went on air, and said that any trouble that brews they would handle it.

53 posted on 01/11/2004 7:07:56 PM PST by Maigrey (I am a member of PETA: People for the Eating of Tasty Animals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Maigrey
Not so much fraudulent but misrepresented.........no excuse can protect CBS.........
56 posted on 01/11/2004 7:09:08 PM PST by OldFriend (Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson