Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terrorism's drug money
townhall.com ^ | January 8, 2004 | Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld

Posted on 01/09/2004 5:16:40 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe

"Drug money sustains al Qaeda," declared the headlines, last week. "The linkage between terrorists and drug trafficking are only now becoming clear and are a great concern," said government officials. Indeed, if only now al-Qaeda’s involvement in the drug trade entered the radar of the US authorities, it is not surprising that al-Qaeda has been able, not only to sustain itself, but also to expand.

The globalization of narco-terrorism, and particularly of the Islamist narco-terror network, has been common knowledge to international law enforcement and intelligence services for decades. And it is not necessarily only a tool to raise funds. Jihad by drugs appears to be one of the terrorists’ most favored methods because it also helps undermine targeted countries politically and economically, while creating public health crisis. According to the most recent publication of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, our national annual cost of drug abuse exceeds $160 billion (including treatment, crime, accidents, and the War on Drugs). In one Administration's single term of office this amounts to $640 billion of the taxpayers’.

The Al-Qaeda dependence on heroin began in the mid-1980s soon after Bin Laden established his organization in Afghanistan, which is, was, and continues to be the world’s major producer of heroin. That the US neglected to identify the danger of Al-Qaeda is one thing, but to miss the connection between al-Qaeda and drugs one has to be willfully blind. And al-Qaeda is not alone – the State Department has already identified at least, 12 other terrorist organizations as dealing in drugs.

Al-Qaeda’s drug-trafficking business involves other terrorist groups such as the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), the stated purpose of which, like al-Qaeda’s, is to turn the sharia into the law of the land. When the Taliban ruled Afghanistan, al-Qaeda gave the IMU access to poppy-growing areas in northern Afghanistan for a fee. The Taliban are gone, but al-Qaeda continues to profit from drug trafficking. In fact, according to Interpol, "the IMU may be responsible for 70% of the total amount of heroin and opium transiting through the area."

The Balkan route has facilitated smuggling for centuries, and is also used by al-Qaeda to traffic in drugs and to smuggle al-Qaeda operatives into Europe. Al-Qaeda’s network in the region is led by Muhammed al-Zawahiri, the brother of Ayman al-Zawahiri, Bin Laden’s closest advisor

A report prepared by Macedonia’s Ministry of the Interior in the spring of 2002, supported by UN and European law enforcement reports, not only lists al-Qaeda’s operations in the Balkans, but also describes their criminal activity and the extent of their cooperation with local organized crime syndicates. Their activities include: running prostitution rings; trafficking in illegal immigrants; smuggling illegal arms, oil, cigarettes, alcohol; trafficking in heroin; and laundering money. According to authorities in Scotland, the Albanian Islamist network have used at least $4 million in profits from Afghan heroin, sold in European cities in 2002, to purchase weapons, including SA-18 and SA –7 surface-to-air missiles.

Another center for drug trafficking for al-Qaeda is the South American Tri-border region—a lawless jungle corner of Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay. This no-man’s land is the heart of Islamist terrorist activity in Latin America. With its porous borders, numerous unguarded waterways, and more than 100 unmonitored hidden airstrips, and with only infrequent passport checks, the region has become a haven for arms dealers, drug traffickers, smugglers, counterfeiters, and terrorists.

According to Brazilian law enforcement, al-Qaeda’s activities in the Tri-Border region include: cocaine and heroin trafficking, arms and uranium smuggling, counterfeiting CDs and DVDs, and money laundering operations, frequently in cooperation with Chinese Triads (criminal groups) and the Russian Mafiya. Moreover, Al-Qaeda’s relationship with Colombian, Peruvian, and Bolivian drug-traffickers often includes arms-for-drugs deals with Latin American terrorist organizations, such as the FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia), the ELN (National Liberation Army), and others.

Al-Qaeda’s involvement in Latin America’s illegal drug trade was preceded by activities of Afghan and Pakistani heroin traffickers, who had worked with the Colombian Cali cartel and the FARC. Not surprisingly, the Colombians’ methods of poppy cultivation resembled those in Afghanistan. According to Colombia’s former police chief, General Rosso Jose Cerrano, Pakistani and Afghan heroin traffickers, like al-Qaeda operatives, often enter Colombia with false identification papers.

Hizballah, which according to US Deputy Secretary of State, Richard Armitage, "may be the A-team of terrorists," is also profiting from the illegal drug trade worldwide. But "while al-Qaeda may be actually the B-team," according to Armitage, Hizballah’s criminal activities, including drug trafficking, are on a par with al-Qaeda’s. Already in the mid-1980s, Hizballah’s use of the illicit drug trade as a funding source and a weapon against the West was sanctioned by an official fatwa (religious edict), saying:" We are making these drugs for Satan America and the Jews. If we cannot kill them with guns, so we will kill them with drugs."

Furthermore, the drug trade has helped Islamist terrorist organizations recruit new members by citing drug abuse they have inflicted as an indication of Western degeneracy, and then, as a justification that such corrupt societies should be destroyed.

Clearly, the drug trade has become one of the major sources of funding terrorism, and the need to eradicate it is greater than ever. An effective solution: The use of mycoherbicides for inducing specific soils to become permanently inadequate to grow selected narcotics producing plants. These mycoherbicides have been tested and proven environmentally and ecologically safe. Eradicating narcotics at the source would not only cut off the funds for terrorists, but would also eliminate a great deal of human suffering, and the enormous cost they presently incur. Moreover, it would render acts of terror much less likely for the future.

The worldwide savings from not having to use billions of dollars to fight the consequence of opium and coca would make monies available to help to fight terrorism, and to help current poppy and coca farmers adjust to loss of narcotics income (which is not much; most of the profits go to the drug lords and the terrorists). These monies could also provide extra funds to support education, women’s rights, and the promotion of democracy.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; bigcogwheelturns; drugtrafficking; globaljihad; moneytrail; wod

1 posted on 01/09/2004 5:16:40 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Ahhh your neighborhood druggy financing world terror!

Aren't these the guys who show up at all the "world piece" rallies?
2 posted on 01/09/2004 5:38:11 PM PST by observer5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
God Bless This Great Country!


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!



3 posted on 01/09/2004 5:38:49 PM PST by Support Free Republic (If Woody had gone straight to the police, this would never have happened!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
We could always just legalize it and tax it with alcohol, and not commit ourselves to global hide-and-seek with drug growers, and take out the profits immediately and not at some undetermined point in the future.
4 posted on 01/09/2004 6:45:19 PM PST by thoughtomator ("I will do whatever the Americans want because I saw what happened in Iraq, and I was afraid"-Qadafi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
But... but... that would destroy the profits of the prison-industrial complex and make it ever so hard for small-town police chiefs to buy helicopters and machine guns!

We can't have that, now can we??
5 posted on 01/09/2004 7:26:06 PM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I never understood why we didn't carpet bomb the poppy fields in Afghanistan...We KNOW what the money is going for.
6 posted on 01/09/2004 9:23:30 PM PST by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lainde
I never understood why we didn't carpet bomb the poppy fields in Afghanistan

Because it's a big friggin country and once we manage to bomb one field, another will just pop up. I think we have more important things to bomb, like Taliban. Remember, drugs don't kill people, people who have made some money selling drugs to buy guns kill people...

7 posted on 01/09/2004 9:33:17 PM PST by Nanodik (Libertarian, Ex-Canadian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
What about a cheaper remedy: start arresting Hollywood, Clintonpal, Wall Street, and Netrwork dopers.
8 posted on 01/09/2004 9:41:33 PM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: observer5; Tailgunner Joe
There is a million times more terror money in oil. The oil sheiks and oil ministers have been funneling oil money into the movement since Jimmie Carter sat idly by as the American Embassy was overtaken back in '79.
9 posted on 01/10/2004 4:39:49 AM PST by Lawgvr1955 (Sic Semper Tyrannus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lainde
"I never understood why we didn't carpet bomb the poppy fields in Afghanistan...We KNOW what the money is going for."


Not all the money goes to "Al Quida"..........

There are people who are simply involved in the heroin business in Afganastan to make money.

Al quida pays protection money just like thugs in the USA pay.

Or perhaps the "Iran-Contra" model is being used.


There are plenty of reasons why the heroin crop has been booming.............


10 posted on 01/10/2004 4:49:18 AM PST by WhiteGuy (Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Clearly, the drug trade has become one of the major sources of funding terrorism, and the need to eradicate it is greater than ever. An effective solution: The use of mycoherbicides for inducing specific soils to become permanently inadequate to grow selected narcotics producing plants. These mycoherbicides have been tested and proven environmentally and ecologically safe. Eradicating narcotics at the source would not only cut off the funds for terrorists, but would also eliminate a great deal of human suffering, and the enormous cost they presently incur. Moreover, it would render acts of terror much less likely for the future.

As a recovering addict, I would LOVE to see cocaine wiped off the planet. But you know what? This is a horrible idea. The Law of Unintended Consequences will assert itself.

A few of these unintended consequences: A super-coca plant could emerge that is completely resistant to disease. This mycoherbicidal organize could evolve to attack benign farm crops. Laboratory-produced cocaine could begin being manufactured, and flood the streets with pure drugs.

Finally, the Unintended Consequence that I cannot predict will assert itself.

11 posted on 01/10/2004 4:56:47 AM PST by Lazamataz (I slam, you slam, we all slam, for Islam !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
But... but... that would destroy the profits of the prison-industrial complex and make it ever so hard for small-town police chiefs to buy helicopters and machine guns! We can't have that, now can we??

Good point. I was very surprised to find out that the most prosecuted felony in America at this time is drug possession.

12 posted on 01/10/2004 5:01:12 AM PST by Lazamataz (I slam, you slam, we all slam, for Islam !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lainde
Heh...check your recent history. Somehow, don't ask me how, but a major increase in narcotics trafficking seems to go hand in hand with U.S. military involvement lately. Think Haiti, Panama, Afghanistan. We just dug an old man out of a hole in the middle of nowhere, but there's nothing that can be done about Afghanistan's resurgence to the top of the opium producing list.
13 posted on 01/10/2004 5:08:57 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson