Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ZOT!!! How do we get fed to the kittens?
MSNBC ^ | 01/09/2004 | Martin Wolk

Posted on 01/09/2004 3:05:21 PM PST by Whatodo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last
To: BlessedBeGod
You betcha. That RAT troll won't be back again. At least under this nickname. LOL We fixed 'em. :)
81 posted on 01/09/2004 7:53:08 PM PST by NRA2BFree (They know we own the guns. Now, all they've gotta do is figure out how to take them away from us!**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Lead Moderator
Damn! I need a new scorecard. I've got too many partially erased checkmarks on this one . . .
82 posted on 01/09/2004 8:00:02 PM PST by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Whatodo
There is a new franchise opening up that is sure to provide
the desired economic stimulation and job growth!


83 posted on 01/09/2004 8:10:57 PM PST by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
I have to agree at least in part, based on the little I have seen since I started reading Free Republic regularly. I hope I don't get banned for saying so! But it seems to me that the folks who are kicked off are not necessarily out to antagonize people -- they simply post an alternative viewpoint without making snide comments about the views expressed in the article or the person who wrote them.

I hasten to add that I am a conservative myself, a Republican in an academic environment no less, and I know full well what it is like to experience the onslaught of political correctness day after day afer day. It just strikes me that this forum might be more informative if the ideas of the "other side" were presented in a semi-serious manner, and countered with a similar degree of levity.

I hope I am not overstepping my bounds as a "newbie" here; I just thought I would share this observation and see what other subscribers to this site have to say about this. Thanks.
84 posted on 01/09/2004 8:18:04 PM PST by Karyn M. PhD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Karyn M. PhD
"...and countered with a similar degree of levity."

Whoops, I meant gravity, not levity. Guess that goes to show you...
85 posted on 01/09/2004 8:26:17 PM PST by Karyn M. PhD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Whatodo

CONSUMER CONFIDENCE

Recent figures

 Dec.* 		91.3 
 Nov. 		92.5 
 Oct. 		81.7 
 Sept. 		77.0 
 Aug.  		81.7 
 July 		77.0 
 June 		83.5 
 May 		83.6 
 April 		81.0 
 March 		61.4 
 Feb. 		64.8 
 Jan. 03 	78.8 
 

What is it?

Consumer confidence is considered important because consumer spending accounts for more than two-thirds of U.S. economic activity. The monthly Conference Board survey is one of the two most closely watched indicators of sentiment. Based on a mail-in survey sent to about 5,000 households. Results are converted to an index and expressed in comparison to the 1985 average of 100.

Source: The Conference Board


RETAIL SALES

Recent figures Nov.* 0.9% Oct. 0.0% Sept. -0.3% Aug. 1.0% July 1.4% June 0.9% May 0.5% April -0.3% March 2.3% Feb. -1.4% Jan. 03 0.4% Dec. 1.4%

What is it?

A broad measure of consumer spending trends. Includes sales of motor vehicles, clothing, food at both grocery stores and restaurants, electronics, building materials drugs and other items. Expressed as a percent change from previous month, adjusted for seasonal variations but not price changes.

Source: Census Bureau


GDP


Recent figures
 Q3* 		 8.2% 
 Q2 		 3.3% 
 Q1 2003 	 1.4% 
 Q4 		 1.4% 
 Q3 		 4.0% 
 Q2 		 1.3% 
 Q1 2002 	 5.0% 
 Q4 		 2.7% 
 Q3 		-0.3% 
 Q2 		-1.6% 
 Q1 2001 	-0.6% 
 Q4 		 1.1% 

What is it?

The gross domestic product is the broadest measure of the economy, comprising the value of all goods and services produced in the United States. It is reported quarterly with frequent revisions. Generally expressed as a percentage change from the previous quarter in "real" or inflation-adjusted terms. Economists presume real GDP is capable of growing at an annual rate of about 3.5 percent over the long term. When GDP declines over a sustained period of time the economy is considered to be in recession.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis.


ISM INDEX

Recent figures
 Dec.* 		66.2 
 Nov. 		62.8 
 Oct.  		57.0 
 Sept.  	53.7 
 Aug.  		54.7 
 July  		51.8 
 June  		49.8 
 May  		49.4 
 April  	45.4 
 March  	46.2 
 Feb.  		50.5 
 Jan. 03 	53.9 

What is it?

The first major indicator reported each month, considered a reliable assessment of how the manufacturing sector is performing. Based on a survey of executives done by the Institute for Supply Management, formerly known as the National Association of Purchasing Management. Responses are compiled and reported as an index number. A reading above 50 percent indicates the manufacturing sector is expanding, while a reading below 50 indicates it is shrinking.

Source: Institute for Supply Management


UNEMPLOYMENT RATE

Recent figures

 Dec.  		5.7% 
 Nov.  		5.9% 
 Oct.  		6.0% 
 Sept.  	6.1% 
 Aug.  		6.1% 
 July  		6.2% 
 June 		6.4% 
 May 		6.1% 
 April 		6.0% 
 March 		5.8% 
 Feb.  		5.8% 
 Jan. 03 	5.7% 

What is it?

One of the best known and most politically powerful economic indicators, the rate is calculated from a monthly survey among a sample of about 60,000 households. The rate is adjusted for seasonal variations, but unlike most economic statistics it is never revised.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.


EMPLOYMENT SITUATION

Recent figures

 Dec.* 		   1,000 
 Nov.  		  43,000 
 Oct.  		 100,000 
 Sept. 		  99,000 
 Aug.  		  35,000 
 July  		 -57,000 
 June  		 -83,000 
 May  		 -76,000 
 April  	 -22,000 
 March  	-151,000 
 Feb.  		-121,000 
 Jan. 03  	  158,000 

What is it?

Represents the month-to-month change in jobs on payrolls of the nation's business, government and non-profit establishments. Generally considered a more accurate indicator of labor market health than the unemployment rate. Analysts estimate the economy should add about 150,000 jobs monthly to keep up with the nation's growing work force. Based on a sample of 300,000 establishments employing nearly a third of the nation's workers, the figure is adjusted for seasonal variations and frequently revised.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.


HOUSING STARTS

(seasonally adjusted annual rate)

Recent figures

 Nov.* 		2,070,000 
 Oct.  		1,980,000 
 Sept.  	1,931,000 
 Aug.  		1,831,000 
 July  		1,890,000 
 June  		1,844,000 
 May  		1,745,000 
 April  	1,627,000 
 March  	1,742,000 
 Feb. 		1,640,000 
 Jan. 03 	1,828,000 
 Dec.  		 1,815,000 

What is it?

A good indicator to assess demand for housing and construction industry health. Represents the number of new residential buildings, including single-family and multifamily homes, where construction was started. Expressed as a seasonally adjusted annual rate. Construction was started on 1.7 million new residential structures in 2002, the highest level since 1986.

Source: Census Bureau.


HOME SALES

(seasonally adjusted annual rate)

Recent figures

 Nov.* 		7,142,000 
 Oct. 		7,459,000 
 Sept.  	7,817,000 
 Aug.  		7,650,000 
 July  		7,275,000 
 June  		7,030,000 
 May  		6,931,000 
 April  	6,854,000 
 March  	6,538,000 
 Feb.  		6,795,000 
 Jan. 03 	7,029,000 
 Dec.  		6,973,000 
 

What is it?

One of the bright spots of the economy in recent years, driven at least in part by historically low mortgage rates. Figure represents the sum of new and existing single-family home sales, expressed as a seasonally adjusted annual rate. In 2002, a record 6.5 million homes were sold.

Sources: National Association of Realtors, Census Bureau




These numbers look pretty good. The trends are upward.

gitmo
86 posted on 01/09/2004 8:45:41 PM PST by gitmo (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Karyn M. PhD
I hope I am not overstepping my bounds as a "newbie" here; I just thought I would share this observation and see what other subscribers to this site have to say about this. Thanks.

Hello and welcome. From my observations, almost all who get zotted are repeat offenders, and the moderaters have a good idea who they are. I've been quite critical of the Bush administration, but I've been here a few years and have never had a problem with the moderators. I also give the Bush administration credit where it's due.

87 posted on 01/09/2004 9:22:53 PM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
spoonfork2000 (a DU member) aka DUVisitor, FrenchStinkyYuck, TrueAmurican, ProudCon1776, Brainshrub, Masked Conservative, et al, banned (again).

Any possibility that early on in a Zotted thread this tidbit could be inserted so as to answer the "Why did that happen?" and eliminate the redundant questions and "outrage"?

I know you're busy...   Thank you for all you do.

88 posted on 01/10/2004 5:39:40 AM PST by GirlShortstop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Karyn M. PhD
"I have to agree at least in part, based on the little I have seen since I started reading Free Republic regularly. I hope I don't get banned for saying so! But it seems to me that the folks who are kicked off are not necessarily out to antagonize people -- they simply post an alternative viewpoint without making snide comments about the views expressed in the article or the person who wrote them."

You have to understand that JR and the team track user IP addresses. These trolls are idiots from DU and some other boards which have posted very anti-FR, anti-conservative articles in the past. Whenever a user with that IP address creates a new user name it sets of the warning bells and then FR nukes the trolls.
89 posted on 01/10/2004 5:58:57 AM PST by Beck_isright ("Deserving ain't got nothing to do with it" - William Money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: will1776
And I missed ALL of them, which stunk.
But it was fun to see the after effects.
90 posted on 01/10/2004 8:51:56 AM PST by Darksheare (Which would be better, an artificial mind for the guy.. or an artificial guy for the mind?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: GirlShortstop; Jim Robinson
I agree. When you get this information, please put it at the top of the article.
91 posted on 01/10/2004 12:58:32 PM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (The Democratic Party: Without an electoral mandate for almost 28 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Lead Moderator
It would seem that it's been a slow past two days.
I haven't seen any trolls posting stupid stuff to generate a zot thread.
Of course, I'm no mod, so I don't see the stuff behind the scenes.
Have the trolls gone on strike?

92 posted on 01/11/2004 3:44:59 PM PST by Darksheare ("The voices in my head won't play with the voices in your head anymore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Karyn M. PhD
Whoops, I meant gravity, not levity. Guess that goes to show you...

We often do both, and sometimes simultaneously. ;^)

Welcome to FreeRepublic.

I've been here for years, but I'm still trying to figure out if it was spoonfork2000 or WhattoDo that got the zot.

93 posted on 01/11/2004 4:10:03 PM PST by e_engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Whatodo
Shouldn't new Freepers be given at least a seventy-two hour probation period before being allowed to post a thread? I would tell "Whatodo" what to do, but it would involve something obscene.
94 posted on 01/11/2004 4:32:39 PM PST by Dionysius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lead Moderator
Think what you want!

Gee thanx!

95 posted on 01/11/2004 4:41:11 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
No, the guys I refer to as the daily trolls seem to have taken a break. Let's see if it is permanent. Thanks, LM
96 posted on 01/11/2004 5:37:27 PM PST by Lead Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Lead Moderator
Let's hope so!
Welcome.
97 posted on 01/11/2004 5:48:41 PM PST by Darksheare ("The voices in my head won't play with the voices in your head anymore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson