 |
|---|
| If you don't make a donation to Free Republic, then that's one more thing you have in common with Patrick Leahy. |
Posted on 01/07/2004 3:42:28 PM PST by aculeus
University of Chicago scientists have proposed a new method for storing hydrogen fuel in this week's online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The lack of practical storage methods has hindered the more widespread use of hydrogen fuels, which are both renewable and environmentally clean. The most popular storage methods-liquid hydrogen and compressed hydrogen-require that the fuel be kept at extremely low temperatures or high pressures. But the University of Chicago's Wendy Mao and David Mao have formed icy materials made of molecular hydrogen that require less stringent temperature and pressure storage conditions.
"This new class of compounds offers a possible alternative route for technologically useful hydrogen storage," said Russell Hemley, Senior Staff Scientist at the Geophysical Laboratory of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. The findings also could help explain how hydrogen becomes incorporated in growing planetary bodies, he said.
The father-daughter team synthesized compounds made of hydrogen and water, hydrogen and methane, and hydrogen and octane in a diamond-anvil cell, which researchers often use to simulate the high pressures found far beneath Earth's surface.
The hydrogen-water experiments produced the best results. "The hydrogen-water system has already yielded three compounds so far, with more likely to be found," said Wendy Mao, a graduate student in Geophysical Sciences at the University of Chicago.
The compound that holds the most promise for hydrogen storage, called a hydrogen clathrate hydrate, was synthesized at pressures between 20,000 and 30,000 atmospheres and temperatures of minus 207 degrees Fahrenheit. More importantly, the compound remains stable at atmospheric pressure and a temperature of minus 320 degrees Fahrenheit, the temperature at which liquid nitrogen boils.
"We thought that would be economically very feasible. Liquid nitrogen is easy and cheap to make," Wendy Mao said.
The hydrogen in a clathrate can be released when heated to 207 degrees Fahrenheit. The clathrate's environmentally friendly byproduct: water.
David Mao noted that while petroleum-based fuels will eventually run out, the supply of hydrogen is limitless. "Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe," said David Mao, a Visiting Scientist in Geophysical Sciences at the University of Chicago. If the new method of storing hydrogen fuel works as expected, "that's going to change everyone's life in a big way," he said.
The Maos have applied for a patent on their hydrogen clathrate synthesis technique, but one problem still remains: how to make the clathrates in quantities sufficient to power a car. "We've only made them in very small amounts in diamond-anvil cells," Wendy Mao said. The Carnegie Institution's Hemley noted that the clathrates can be produced in gas pressure devices as well as diamond-anvil cells.
In the realm of planetary science, the study helps explain how some of Jupiter's moons could have incorporated hydrogen during their formation. Scientists once thought that the moons were incapable of retaining hydrogen during their formation. Now it appears that Callisto, Ganymede and especially Europa contain large quantities of water ice, which would require the presence of hydrogen. The hydrogen clathrates that the Maos synthesized in the laboratory could have formed naturally under the temperature and pressure conditions expected to prevail inside these Jovian moons, Wendy Mao said.
This story has been adapted from a news release issued by University Of Chicago
|
|---|
| If you don't make a donation to Free Republic, then that's one more thing you have in common with Patrick Leahy. |
Maybe, but most of the hydrogen is already burned. That is, it's in water. It takes energy from something else (fossil fuels, nukes, the sun, whatever) to get hydrogen fuel to store. Storage is in fact the small part of the problem.
Indeed it does. The problem is that it takes more energy to separate the hydrogen from the oxygen than you get back when you burn the hydrogen in oxygen to make water. Thus Mao somewhat overstates the impact of hydrogen as fuel. It's cleaner burning than fossil fuels, except you still have to burn fossil fuels or something else to make it.
However much hydrogen you make, you're still going to burn that much fossil fuel, unless the producing region's electricity is supplied by a nuke plant. Some are, many aren't. Most of the nuke plants are old. It's been hard to start new ones since Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and various lib scare campaigns.
I'm sure there are efficiencies of scale if most cars are burning hydrogen. Whether that's a revolutionary advance is a question.
I wish we hadn't lost our nerve in this area. We could build safer reactors today than ever before if we dared.
Mr. Fusion
During last pres election, Bush said he would push for new nuke plants. I've heard a few things about his effort, but he's been kinda busy. Nothing to show for it yet.
I think the world might soon be ready for more nukes. Particularly some of the new designs that are impossible to china syndrome.
On a bet, I recently donated to my first environmental group. The "Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy". They're based in france, but trying to fire up groups here in the US.
I get this idea that fusion is a pipe dream that will never happen. At least right now, it appears it's only used by scientific professionals to get government grants.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.