Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush's Budget for 2005 Seeks to Rein In Domestic Costs
New york times ^ | January 4, 2004 | By ROBERT PEAR

Posted on 01/04/2004 3:41:14 AM PST by sopwith

Facing a record budget deficit, Bush administration officials say they have drafted an election-year budget that will rein in the growth of domestic spending without alienating politically influential constituencies.

They said the president's proposed budget for the 2005 fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1, would control the rising cost of housing vouchers for the poor, require some veterans to pay more for health care, slow the growth in spending on biomedical research and merge or eliminate some job training and employment programs. The moves are intended to trim the programs without damaging any essential services, the administration said.

Even with the improving economic outlook, administration officials said, the federal budget deficit in the current fiscal year is likely to exceed last year's deficit of $374 billion, the largest on record.

The Congressional Budget Office and the White House budget office have projected a deficit of more than $450 billion this year.

But Joshua B. Bolten, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, has said the president's policies will cut the deficit in half within five years, through a combination of economic growth and fiscal restraint.

Mr. Bush's budget request, to be sent to Congress by Feb. 2, includes several tax cut proposals, including new incentives for individual saving and tax credits to help uninsured people buy health insurance. The Democratic candidates for president have accused Mr. Bush of doing little to halt the recent rapid increase in the number of uninsured.

Administration officials said the president's budget would call for an overall increase of about 3 percent in appropriations for so-called domestic discretionary spending, which excludes the Department of Homeland Security, the Defense Department and insurance benefits like Medicare and Medicaid.

As he completes work on his budget, Mr. Bush faces criticism from conservatives, who say he has presided over a big increase in federal spending, and liberals, who say his tax cuts have converted a large budget surplus to a deficit.

Total federal revenues have declined for three consecutive years, apparently the first time that has happened since the early 1920's. But in those years, from 2000 to 2003, total federal spending has increased slightly more than 20 percent, to $2.16 trillion last year.

Brian M. Riedl, an economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, said: "President Bush is not focusing on his fiscal conservative base right now. He's trying to position himself in between conservatives in Congress and the Democratic Party. It may be good politics, but it's bad policy, a lost opportunity to get runaway government spending under control."

White House officials deny that they have acquiesced in a domestic spending spree. They insist, as do some liberal advocacy groups, that appropriations for domestic programs are not exploding.

Such spending, they say, will increase 3 percent in 2004, after increases of 5 percent in 2003, 6 percent in 2002 and 15 percent in 2001. Moreover, they say, increased corporate profits should lead to an increase in corporate tax payments, lifting revenues in the coming years.

Richard Kogan, a budget analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal-leaning research and advocacy group, said the increase in military and domestic security spending in the last two years dwarfed the increase in domestic discretionary programs, which did not quite keep pace with inflation.

"The increases for defense, international affairs and homeland security have been much greater — and thus have played a much larger role in the return to deficits — than the increases for domestic appropriations," Mr. Kogan said.

Housing officials said the administration was alarmed at increases in the cost of vouchers, which provide rental assistance to low-income families, and would take steps to prevent local housing agencies from issuing more vouchers than Congress had authorized. Congress has tentatively decided to provide $14.2 billion for renewal of vouchers this year, an increase of about 15 percent.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: budget; bush43; cbo; domesticspending; government; spending

1 posted on 01/04/2004 3:41:15 AM PST by sopwith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sopwith
Bush administration officials say they have drafted an election-year budget that will rein in the growth of domestic spending...

They said that last year...and the year before.

2 posted on 01/04/2004 3:44:36 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
15 Wisconsin 221.00
5
44.20
245
0.90
173.00
11

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

3 posted on 01/04/2004 3:45:34 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
I'll believe fat is being cut when I see NPR defunded along with NEA (Arts).
4 posted on 01/04/2004 3:51:31 AM PST by doosee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sopwith
Bush administration officials say they have drafted an election-year budget that will rein in the growth of domestic spending...

Jr. is gonna undo what he has done? He found the MIA 'veto' pen?

Ha.

5 posted on 01/04/2004 4:11:04 AM PST by Old Fud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sopwith
I should blasted well hope so!!!!
6 posted on 01/04/2004 4:17:48 AM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sopwith
Already posted herehttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1051038/posts

Sorry, but on this matter I don't trust him.
7 posted on 01/04/2004 4:32:43 AM PST by RJCogburn ("I need a good judge."......Lucky Ned Pepper to Mattie Ross of near Dardenelle in Yell County)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Exactly....but there is a larger, more cynical purpose here. It will serve to shore up support from conservatives for our big government president. Then again, I could be wrong. Dubya can always take conservatives for granted
8 posted on 01/04/2004 6:55:59 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doosee
NPR is small potatoes compares to Dubya's big spending increases in Medicare, agricultural, and transportation.
9 posted on 01/04/2004 6:56:57 AM PST by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Then again, I could be wrong. Dubya can always take conservatives for granted.

I don't think so. It's an election year so Bush will want to make it look like he talks the talk. But when it comes to walking the walk he'll go mincing back over to the big spending side of the aisle.

10 posted on 01/04/2004 7:06:05 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Actually, Bush has been very smart in his tax cuts, drugs for seniors, etc.. They will mostly take affect after he is voted in. You will get hammered after you vote him in. The promised benefits of tax cuts will end in 2010. We know what will happen to senior drug expenses from previous programs. The prospects are worse on the other side of the aisle. Between the devil and the deep blue sea is the best way to describe the situation for any conservative who really cares.
11 posted on 01/04/2004 7:37:27 AM PST by meenie (Remember the Alamo! Alamo! One more time. Alamo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sopwith
Sounds lie a president who just wants to tinker with every thing. We start by giving billions to seniors and illegal immigrants and then take away help for vets. In fact most of the things he is cutting make no sense in light of the senior Welfare program he just initiated. This is scary stuff. And it all appears to be for where the most votes are.
12 posted on 01/04/2004 11:38:48 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson