Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/03/2004 5:26:09 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Wolfie
Just how many shots were fired?
2 posted on 01/03/2004 5:30:16 AM PST by Glenn (What were you thinking, Al?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
South Korea




10.00
1

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

3 posted on 01/03/2004 5:31:46 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfie
They try to tell us that only cops should have guns.

Horse Puckey!
4 posted on 01/03/2004 5:34:36 AM PST by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfie
A man backing a car on a sidewalk can hardly be called "unarmed"! Some people are fixated on guns.
6 posted on 01/03/2004 5:36:01 AM PST by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfie
It's a good thing they weren't shooting at the broad side of a barn.
8 posted on 01/03/2004 5:55:44 AM PST by Wumpus Hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfie
"There are occasions when officers are entitled to shoot at someone in a moving vehicle," Wolfgang said, adding that some of the bullets hit the car."

Yeah, when their lives are in danger by the perp. I had to take a weapons safety course to qualify with the service revolver every year. One thing that is stressed is that you don't pull out your weapon unless you plan to use it. Another is you don't use your weapon in an unsafe situation, especially where civilians may be injured. And finally, you don't fire your weapon without being certain where those bullets are going. These guys were wrong in firing at a moving vehicle if there was no danger to themselves. I usually find myself siding with the police officers, but in this case...I just can't.

11 posted on 01/03/2004 6:41:38 AM PST by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *bang_list
Doesn't the article title seem unusually and excupatorily passive?

How about "Cop shoots bystander"?
13 posted on 01/03/2004 11:28:46 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfie
remember the scene in "It's a Wonderful Life", when george bailey is running down the street after he has slugged burt the cop, and burt gets up and draws his gun and fires after george.... it always cracks me up the way he randomly shoots four shots at a fleeing suspect as innocent bystanders could be dropping like flies in pottersville...

teeman
18 posted on 01/03/2004 7:09:25 PM PST by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson