Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Risk of holiday terror far-flung, officials say
Seattle Times ^ | Dec. 23, 2003 | not given

Posted on 12/24/2003 5:47:06 AM PST by pttttt

Tuesday, December 23, 2003, 12:00 A.M. Pacific

Risk of holiday terror far-flung, officials say

By Seattle Times news services

Al-Qaida operatives may be plotting several unrelated attacks in the United States, targeting not only major cities but also remote bulwarks of the "critical infrastructure" in an effort to cause mass casualties and major economic damage, U.S. officials said yesterday.

Senior U.S. counter-terrorism officials said they have been unable to nail down specifics about a time or place for any potential attacks, despite a mad scramble to do so since receiving an alarming cache of corroborated intelligence beginning last Thursday.

But the officials say the intelligence they have received — much of it from intercepted communications among known terrorists overseas — clearly refers to at least one series of coordinated, simultaneous strikes like those of Sept. 11, 2001, as well as isolated plots of varying degrees of sophistication.

Much of the recent intelligence makes broad references to large urban areas, including New York, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and Las Vegas, while other pieces of intelligence cite less well-known locales such as Rappahannock County, Va., and Valdez, Alaska, where tankers load oil from the Trans-Alaska Pipeline, according to several senior U.S. officials.

According to information received as recently as yesterday, authorities remain primarily concerned about al-Qaida terrorists plotting to hijack commercial airliners and cargo planes and fly them into U.S. targets, as Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge said Sunday in announcing the decision to elevate the terror threat level one notch, from "elevated," or yellow, to "high," or orange.

But the FBI, CIA and other authorities have also picked up troubling intelligence about other plots to blow up chemical and hazardous materials facilities, nuclear power plants, dams, power grids, ports and airports.

Of particular concern, said one senior federal law enforcement official, are vague references to upcoming attacks on "major metropolitan areas and events that we're looking at ... bowl games, New Year's events, that kind of thing."

"There is no one specific threat here. There is no place or time to tie to this," said the senior federal law-enforcement official.

The intelligence that has prompted such an unprecedented level of concern comes from conversations among known terrorists and also from information gleaned from intercepted e-mails, discussions in Internet chat rooms and interrogations of al-Qaida detainees on several continents, several senior U.S. counter-terrorism officials said.

Across the nation, authorities tightened security at bridges, tunnels, ports, landmarks, nuclear and chemical facilities, and other possible targets of attack. The police presence on New York's streets and in its subway system increased visibly. Inspections at ports of entry were increased, the FBI established 24-hour command centers at all 56 of its field offices, and security at the United Nations was tightened.

The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) said it had stepped up air patrols with F-16 fighter jets around "critical infrastructure."

At Chicago's Sears Tower, extra steps were taken to keep visitors to the landmark safe, including increased walking patrols. Canine patrols were increased at O'Hare and Midway airports, and flight paths over the city may be altered.

Inspections have been boosted at all 301 U.S. entry points.

"Our government is doing everything we can to protect our country," President Bush said yesterday. "American citizens need to go about their lives, but as they do so, they need to know that governments at all levels are working as hard as we possibly can to protect the American citizens."

Compiled from reports by the Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post and The Associated Press.

Copyright © 2003 The Seattle Times Company


TOPICS: Anthrax Scare; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Alaska; US: District of Columbia; US: Virginia; US: Washington; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bomb; dam; hijack; nuclear; orangealert4; rappahannock; targets; terror; threat

1 posted on 12/24/2003 5:47:07 AM PST by pttttt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pttttt
I REPEAT:
Although I've pummeled this into the ground, I thank God every second that George Bush is President in this time of war against our nation, against Jews and Christians and Hindus, and against freedom. Whatever happens, we can not possibly have a better Captain (and Crew) at the helm.
MERRY CHRISTMAS!
===
2 posted on 12/24/2003 5:53:10 AM PST by Indie (Have you bought ammo today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indie
If it happens here....The Dimocrats would love it.
3 posted on 12/24/2003 6:12:40 AM PST by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Ain't that the truth. The Rats would like nothing better than to see the US destroyed and turned into a communist state. The freeking traitorous &^%$^&ers.
4 posted on 12/24/2003 6:29:59 AM PST by Indie (Have you bought ammo today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Dallas59
If they hit us again, the nation will rally behind President Bush just as we did after 9-11. The will and public support will be there for an immediate counterstrike. The only point in question is whether
Syria or Iran will be the target. If the plot is currently being busted up, I would surmise that those two governments are working overtime to leak intelligence to us to escape from this scenario.
6 posted on 12/24/2003 6:36:08 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Indie
I agree, Indie:

Thank God for President Bush

7 posted on 12/24/2003 7:09:37 AM PST by Savage Beast (Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
I agree, Buck. A second attack would galvanize American public opinion and accelerate the destruction of the terrorists and their networks.
8 posted on 12/24/2003 7:12:20 AM PST by Savage Beast ( "Whom WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!" ~Happy2BMe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson