Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two Decades of Sanctions, Isolation Wore Down Gaddafi
Washington Post ^ | December 20, 2003 | Robin Wright and Glenn Kessler

Posted on 12/20/2003 3:33:13 PM PST by kennedy

Libya's stunning decision yesterday to surrender its weapons of mass destruction followed two decades of international isolation and some of the world's most punishing economic sanctions. In the end, Libyan leader Col. Moammar Gaddafi was under so much pressure that he was forced to seek an end to the economic and political isolation threatening his government -- and his own survival, according to U.S. and British officials and outside experts.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; gaddafi; kaddafi; libya; saddam; sanctions; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Of course, watching what Bush did to Saddam had nothing to do with it. Purely a coincidence.
1 posted on 12/20/2003 3:33:14 PM PST by kennedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kennedy
Never saw sanctions work, before. I guess this is a first? Ditto above.
2 posted on 12/20/2003 3:36:43 PM PST by ClaireSolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
The fact that he finally ran out of Billy Beer didn't hurt, either.


3 posted on 12/20/2003 3:37:07 PM PST by Paul Atreides (Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
Amazing, truly amazing. Washington Post is truly a commie rag.

"What forced Gaddafi to act was a combination of things -- U.N. sanctions after the Lockerbie bombing, his international isolation after the Soviet Union's collapse . . . and internal economic problems that led to domestic unrest by Islamists and forces within the military," said Ray Takeyh, a Libya expert at the National Defense University.

4 posted on 12/20/2003 3:38:57 PM PST by Rightone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
Yes. Obviously so! Bush and the USA can take no credit for this. This only came about from "international isolation and some of the world's most punishing economic sanctions."

The UN has again handed the world a grand and glorious victory, no thanks to the USA and Bush.

Excuse me now please. I have to go huurrrrllllll!!!!!

Hb
5 posted on 12/20/2003 3:39:43 PM PST by Hoverbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rightone
I think anything posted on FR from the Washington post should come with a BIAS Alert.
6 posted on 12/20/2003 3:43:26 PM PST by rllngrk33 (Liberals are guilty of everything they accuse Conservatives of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
Another who'd urged jihad to others, dragged out of a hole.
7 posted on 12/20/2003 3:43:50 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
20 years of sanctions and 20 seconds of videotape of Saddam getting a tongue depressor stuck down his throat.
8 posted on 12/20/2003 3:45:27 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rightone; kennedy
Amazing, truly amazing. Washington Post is truly a commie rag.

Read on... the article takes a more blatant shot at Bush For all the Bush administration's focus on deadly arms, however, the United States may have missed an opportunity to act earlier because of its preoccupation with Afghanistan and then Iraq, said U.S. officials familiar with earlier overtures.

I am waiting for Baghdad Jim to sat this wall all a pre-arranged plot

9 posted on 12/20/2003 3:48:56 PM PST by eeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
Of course, watching what Bush did to Saddam had nothing to do with it. Purely a coincidence.

Another domino falls in our President's favor. When will the media acknowledge this fact?

10 posted on 12/20/2003 3:49:46 PM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeman
Ooops, I meant to say

I am waiting for Baghdad Jim to say this was all a pre-arranged plot

11 posted on 12/20/2003 3:50:23 PM PST by eeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
Of course, watching what Bush did to Saddam had nothing to do with it. Purely a coincidence.

Of course not. Bush deserves credit for nothing. < /sarc > (I hope that wasn't necessary but just in case the humor impaired are out to night)

I was worried that we were not paying proper attention to Libya. I am glad to see that I was wrong. Qaddafi has had me worried for about two years now.

This gives me more faith in that the government really is noticing and defusing threats both present and future.

12 posted on 12/20/2003 3:50:46 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Prancer II: Pass the Mashed Potatoes and Gravy. - Delicious! A Holiday Movie for the whole family!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
What Khadaffi actually gave up is debateable.He had made some sort of start on enriching uranium,had the labs for a low-grade biowarfare project,and had done some work on chemical weapons,but-supposedly due to sanctions-hadn't been able to do much with any of his "special weapons".

Still,it's at least a worthwhile symbolic gesture,I suppose.
13 posted on 12/20/2003 3:51:54 PM PST by genefromjersey (So little time - so many FLAMES to light !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
I agree. Talk is cheap.
14 posted on 12/20/2003 3:53:32 PM PST by KantianBurke (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
Another domino falls in our President's favor. When will the media acknowledge this fact?

When hell freezes over. Just a guess.

15 posted on 12/20/2003 3:53:51 PM PST by Semi Civil Servant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
Of course Ronald Reagan dropping bombs on his house had nothing to do with it, nooooooooooooooo.

Along comes RR II. and lookie here.
16 posted on 12/20/2003 3:54:02 PM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
Whether by coincidence or fear that Libya might be targeted, Gaddafi's envoys approached Britain on the eve of the Iraq war to discuss a deal, U.S. officials said.

Must be a coincidence.

17 posted on 12/20/2003 3:55:47 PM PST by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
So, if we were just a little more patient Saddam would have given in too. I see.
18 posted on 12/20/2003 3:56:22 PM PST by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoverbug

19 posted on 12/20/2003 3:56:37 PM PST by mirkwood (If we stop voting, will they go away?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
I can see the Dem spin coming now: Had we worked with the UN and the international community we could have isolated Iraq and avoided the war.

In reality, it was the tongue depressor that scared the bajeepers out of Gaddafi.
20 posted on 12/20/2003 3:57:24 PM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson