Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peacerose; Landru; ForGod'sSake; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Copernicus; Mr. Mulliner; thesummerwind; ...
 

CCRM  ping

Cogito, ergo FReepum

CCRM is a Free Republic Network affiliate working to reduce media bias.

For a comprehensive overview of Freeper thoughts on Liberal Media bias, check out our website by clicking on graphic, or HERE: We call it Fairpress.org.

This thread is evidence that liberal bias is still with us. Come join our team and engage in the battle against the Liberal Media.

3 posted on 12/19/2003 7:20:20 AM PST by bert (Have you offended a liberal today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bert
CCRM is a Free Republic Network

The center of the universe!

11 posted on 12/19/2003 10:37:54 AM PST by thesummerwind (like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: bert
Hi bert; howya ben? ;^)

Study: President's Coverage Dipped Sharply After “Mission Accomplished” Event

From the previous press release on 9/8:

Overall, Networks Strike Perfect Balance: Despite widespread criticism that network news was overly supportive of Operation Iraqi Freedom, coverage on the broadcast networks was evenly balanced. ABC, CBS and NBC collectively aired 50 percent positive and 50 percent negative opinions about US policies or conduct. Coverage on FOX was more favorable toward the war, with 60 percent positive opinions.

Wide Disparities in News Agendas: ABC’s coverage was the most critical of the war, with two out of three (66 percent) on-air comments negative. CBS’s coverage was the most supportive, with nearly three out of every four (74 percent) opinions favorable. NBC’s coverage was most balanced towards the American mission-53 percent positive vs. 47 percent negative evaluations.

What a difference 90 days makes? Now, it appears the very best the propogandists can do during the conflict is 50/50 coverage. Thank God for small favors, eh? Petah of course being the worst of the lot. The newsies will not admit the U.S. is fighting terrorism and terrorists in the middle east just as surely as if they were fighting 'em here on our soil. IMO anyway. They are too chicken$hit to bring the battle to us so we take it to them.

Can you just envision a bona fide "attack" by bin Laden and company on U.S. soil? Har! It wouldn't last 30 minutes. Of course Petah and the rest of the Ministry of Information would carp about the violence with which U.S. citizens reacted. ABCNNBCBS are worse than worthless; they're dangerous. Well, I could go on, but...

Another graphic forya:

FGS

18 posted on 12/20/2003 9:31:58 PM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson