[eastforker]

Actualy it was FreeRepublic at 5:01.

[freedomlover]

There was widespread agreement, as the saying goes, on virtually every network that the Bush administration's triumph in capturing Hussein was very bad news for Dean, a constant critic of the war now left looking like a monkey whose organ grinder had run away.

hahahahahahaha

[GreyFriar]

Shales is showing his bias and ignorance:

"Somewhat surprisingly, Fox featured not one but two NPR reporters among its guest commentators. Fox is considered very conservative and NPR is considered very liberal. Perhaps this occasion was so momentous that even political labels and ideological fixations could be cast aside. At least for a few hours."

It is too bad he has never watched Fox Sunday News with Tony Snow or he would know that the "two NPR reporters among its guest commentators" were actually regular commentators Myra Liason and Juan Williams.

[tom h]

I love contrasts -- imagine in your mind Dan Rather interviewing SAddam Hussein before the war; and then imagine the CIA interviewing him now. Rather, getting useless polemics from the dictator; and the CIA, getting timely and legitimate intelligence from him.

[Publius6961]

Video at first was limited to enjoyably humiliating footage of Hussein...

This is not American English; not an expression associated with the mug shot of a bank robber or a mass murderer. Not in my entire life have I seen a criminal described this way by an American reporter.

This is clearly a conscious effort to use the enemy's cultural agitprop to report what is clearly an outstanding American coup. A statement calculated either to inflame the sandmaggots, or to validate their existing "outrage" agitprop.
I would classify this as clearly treasonous.