Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/11/2003 11:29:33 AM PST by So Cal Rocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: So Cal Rocket
Yeah! Hot dang!
2 posted on 12/11/2003 11:30:08 AM PST by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: patton
FYI
3 posted on 12/11/2003 11:30:37 AM PST by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: So Cal Rocket
And Dean will re-introduce the ABM Treaty if elected.
4 posted on 12/11/2003 11:30:52 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: So Cal Rocket
Cool!
7 posted on 12/11/2003 11:49:03 AM PST by demlosers (Light weight and flexible - radiation shielding is solved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: So Cal Rocket
I am so glad the test was successful! This will shut up the neysayers.

More interesting info from another article:

"Last December, President Bush (news - web sites) ordered the Pentagon (news - web sites) to have ready for use within two years a bare-bones system for defending American territory, troops and allies against attack by ballistic missiles, calling such action an essential step toward providing defenses against threats such as missiles armed with chemical, biological or nuclear warheads.


Under Bush's plan, 20 Standard Missile-3 interceptors would be placed aboard three Navy ships with improved versions of the Aegis system that uses radar to detect and track hostile missiles and cue on-board weapons to intercept them.


This sea-based system was outlawed under the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, but Bush gained the flexibility of testing it when the United States withdrew from the treaty last year. The plan also calls for the development of ground-based interceptors. "

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=519&ncid=718&e=6&u=/ap/20031211/ap_on_re_us/missile_defense_test



8 posted on 12/11/2003 12:00:53 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: So Cal Rocket
"successfully engaged the target with hit-to-kill technology"

But .....But ...... But, I thought the Council of Concerned Liberal Scientists said it couldn't be done.

NO FAIR, make 'em stop. This is suposed to be too hard.

/SARCASM

So9

9 posted on 12/11/2003 12:09:44 PM PST by Servant of the 9 (Screwing the Inscrutable: or is that Scruting the Inscrewable?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wretchard; Grampa Dave; SAMWolf
NMD bump -- see http://www.raytheon.com/feature/sm3/ for some fluffy PR on the SM3 ("The kinetic warhead is based on technology developed during the Lightweight Exo-Atmospheric Projectile (LEAP) program.")
18 posted on 12/12/2003 1:07:05 AM PST by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson