Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Revelation 911
Polycarps point though was that it IS appropriate fodder for the site as we are supposed to be conservatives.

You think detailed, graphic descriptions of anal sex are appropriate for a website that is frequently viewed by minors?

I'm glad Jim's in charge and not you.

17 posted on 12/11/2003 6:56:23 AM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
I just googled it up and scanned through it. There are no "detailed, graphic descriptions" of any kind of sex.

It's gross, but only because of the topic discussed, and the fact that they are clearly not tip-toeing around the issues.

22 posted on 12/11/2003 7:07:12 AM PST by B Knotts (Go 'Nucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
"You think detailed, graphic descriptions of anal sex are appropriate for a website that is frequently viewed by minors?"

YES, just so long as these verbal descriptions are factual and they are used to expose and condemn the disgusting thing that they describe. The homosexual community endeavor to make their deadly activity appear attractive by using words like "gay", and "alternative lifestyle". So exposing these lies with a dose of reality is just what is needed.

And know this, sinkspur; the public schools use graphic illustrations of sex, including written and photographic images of homosexual "lovers", to educate our minors. They even introduce books like "Heather Has Two Mommies" for kindergarten age children. They hire female comedians to wear giant condoms on stage to implore our children to have "safe sex". They distribute free condoms to our minors, with explicit instructions on how to use them. They even tell the girls to carry them, and tell them how to put them on boys. By the time our minor children are in middle school they know as much graphic detail about sex as most gynocologists and urologists... so who the hell are you kidding?

29 posted on 12/11/2003 7:43:07 AM PST by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
You think detailed, graphic descriptions of anal sex are appropriate for a website that is frequently viewed by minors?

stats please

do you think the gay crowds move to indoctrinate people into the lifestyle is appropriate on television, radio, schools, music, movie theaters? If they hear Polycarps stuff, that is most likly the tamest thing they will see....for Gods sake, my kids get ads for viagra etc right in thier mailbox, and youre worried about some facts regarding the truth about anal homosexual intercourse?

....and IF they were offended - what the hell are they doing surfing unsupervised?

This is '03 sink'....our last president introduced our kids and my 9 and 10 yr olds to hummers, and we all witnessed our brothers and sisters splattered in NYC - inncocence has been lost for sometime.

I'd really be doubtful as well that this site is visited by minors - not enough colors or bright flashy thingies, no sound, and theyre constantly hitting you up for money.

Besides - anyone intentionally coming here is aware of what goes on and is discussed here.

Its amusing you want to protect the chillun' from Polycarps tracts and seem all too comfortable enabling this incessant onslaught of indecency and moral depravity - proving yet again, my initial contention was correct - this aint no conservative site.

33 posted on 12/11/2003 8:05:38 AM PST by Revelation 911 (What is it that gays are proud of ..... the HIV, Carposi's sarcoma, hemmoroids or sin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson