And, yes, Dr. Kopp and I had very public disagreements over his exploitation of this pornographic material on Free Republic.
He's no longer here (of his own volition) because he wanted the freedom to post anything he wanted, and Jim said no.
Polycarps point though was that it IS appropriate fodder for the site as we are supposed to be conservatives.
For Heavens sake, theyve co-opted Gods rainbow, changed the meaning of the word "gay" and now framed the discussion of what homosexuality actually is on FR by claiming frequently and loudly that its "hate speech".....to the point where society as a whole begins to accept the notion (us included)
This may be a forum - but it sure aint conservative - If anything, its Republican....and if that comment gets me banned, so be it
Only you and Bishop Adamec and other liberal apologists would call it pornographic. Glad to see where you're coming from, "deacon." You'd fit right in Adamec's chancery office reign of terror.
hmmmmm, I've seen big, full colored closeups on FR of dead American soldiers, a burnt severed foot, rotting Iraqi corpses from mass graves, skulls with bullet holes in them, you name it. But now, a written explanation of how homosexuals corrupt the human sex act, using clinical language, is "exploitation" and too hard for us to take? Thanks for the laugh, I needed it.