Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alien Laws - We have rules. Why aren't we enforcing them?
NRO ^ | Senator Jon Kyl

Posted on 12/08/2003 3:04:15 PM PST by gubamyster

By Senator Jon Kyl

“Born in other countries, yet believing you could be happy in this, our laws acknowledge, as they should do, your right to join us in society, conforming, as I doubt not you will do, to our established rules. That these rules shall be [equal] will certainly be the aim of our legislatures."

So wrote Thomas Jefferson 202 years ago.

His sentiment then holds true today. America should be a welcoming haven for immigrants. But those seeking citizenship must follow our nation's rules. And our governments, both local and federal, have a responsibility to apply immigration laws fairly and equally to everyone.

Today, Arizonans know all too well how far we have strayed from Jefferson's wise counsel.

Our federal government has instituted immigration laws that it lacks either the will or ability to enforce. Legal immigrants, who followed all the rules, waited patiently, and sometimes left their homelands at great risk to become American citizens, have watched as lawbreakers enter the United States while our government does little to stop them. Many of our elected leaders actively seek to make it even easier for illegal (the common euphemism is "undocumented") immigrants to get jobs, obtain driver's licenses, and even vote as if they'd done all the required work that comes with earning something so valued as U.S. citizenship.

American citizens have suffered as a result of the failure to deter illegal entry. We've experienced higher rates of crime, had to compete with non-citizens for basic social services, and endured longer waits for emergency health care.

To cite just one example, many health-care facilities in Arizona are in danger of closing or going bankrupt due in large part to the crushing costs associated with emergency treatment of illegals. Federal law requires this treatment, no doubt with the best of intentions. Yet the costs — which are in the millions — have been almost completely absorbed by hospitals, doctors, and emergency transport providers. These financial hardships impact us directly. American citizens, and particularly Medicare recipients, could lose crucial access to emergency and burn centers if something isn't done. To save our hospitals and protect our citizens' access to health care, I helped get reimbursements for these facilities as part of the recent Medicare reform bill. But the immigration issue has frustrated people to such a degree that some misconstrued this commonsense effort as yet another "giveaway" to illegals.

I understand many Americans' frustration, particularly those living right on the border, about our government's acquiescence in lawbreaking. And we all know the primary reasons for this abdication of responsibility: the lure of cheap labor; the costs of hiring and deploying border agents and other necessary resources; and a politically correct expression of sympathy with the violators that is often exploited for perceived political gain.

Especially galling to many is the lack of enforcement of immigration laws in the interior. As it stands today, the resources available for this job are woefully insufficient. Phoenix, for example, has only 15 Deportation Officers (those with arrest authority) and Tucson has only two! According to Phoenix Special Agent in Charge, Tom DeRouchey, "It's gotten to the point where the agents we have been working seven days a week for two-week periods. The workload is that much."

Border agents who do try to enforce laws are often attacked for insensitivity, or for contributing to deaths in the desert, or for creating border-enforcement zones that one local newspaper columnist blasted as "cruel" and "a death trap."

Because of these obstacles to border enforcement, I approach the notion of "guest worker" legislation very cautiously. If we are not enforcing current immigration laws, the question naturally arises: Why would we be any more likely to enforce new laws? Without a clear, firm intent to enforce existing laws, what would discourage more illegal immigrants from entering the country in hopes of yet another "guest worker" or amnesty bill in the future? Will we be sending the signal to others that, if they can get into the United States and lay low for a few years, they too could gain legal status (even citizenship) in the United States? These are the sorts of questions and concerns policymakers must be prepared to address at the beginning of debate on new immigration proposals.

As a nation, we need to return to Thomas Jefferson's point about immigration: that we should welcome all, but take seriously the rules governing their entry and participation in American life. Anything less undercuts the sanctity of our laws and the value of being a citizen of the greatest nation on earth.

— Senator Jon Kyl is a Republican senator from Arizona.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: aliens; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; jonkyl; kyle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 12/08/2003 3:04:16 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *immigrant_list; A Navy Vet; Lion Den Dan; Free the USA; Libertarianize the GOP; madfly; B4Ranch; ..
ping
2 posted on 12/08/2003 3:04:55 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
I watched the September 11 Commission hearings today. Very interesting, and the immigration question came up again and again!
3 posted on 12/08/2003 3:06:45 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Davis is now out of Arnoold's Office , Bout Time!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
Alien Laws - We have rules. Why aren't we enforcing them?

Very easy answer to the rhetorical question.

Because politicians in all 3 branches of government - especially the executive - care care more about keeping their lame useless asses in office then they do about the country they serve, the laws they have sworn to uphold or the people that elected them.

4 posted on 12/08/2003 3:11:44 PM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
Gosh, a Republican Senator who has common sense? I wish the President did.
5 posted on 12/08/2003 3:13:21 PM PST by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
It's not that our immigration laws don't work---it's just that no one's seriously tried to enforce them for the past 10 years at least. Are we supposed to let our local police department withdraw all personnel from an area, have crime skyrocket as a consequence, and then tolerate arguments from them that the criminal law "doesn't work" and "has to be changed" in order to "recognize the reality of the role violent criminals play in our community"?
6 posted on 12/08/2003 3:20:48 PM PST by Map Kernow (" 'Hate speech' is just 'speech liberals hate' ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
because immigration services are divided into three parts. One part just processes forms, then you have the immigration courts which process appeals and deportations, and lastly the federal district courts which hear appeals from the rejection from the imigration courts.

The beareacratic part is basically form pushers looking with very little scrutiny. (otherwise they would really scrutinize the marriages a bit more.)
7 posted on 12/08/2003 3:34:34 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
Are we supposed to let our local police department withdraw all personnel from an area, have crime skyrocket as a consequence, and then tolerate arguments from them that the criminal law "doesn't work" and "has to be changed" in order to "recognize the reality of the role violent criminals play in our community"?

Are we supposed to let our local police catch and release known criminals?

I don't think anyone is talking about removing police from an area or their jobs and becoming solely immigration officers. I think what most people want is that asinine rules like Special Order 40 and ludicrous policies like sanctuary zones are eliminated. There is no reason in their normal course of doing their jobs, that the police, who we are paying “to protect and serve” the taxpayers, refuse to question illegals about their status or report illegals to immigration.

8 posted on 12/08/2003 3:37:02 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
We have rules. Why aren't we enforcing them?

Hey! He's a Senator!

9 posted on 12/08/2003 3:37:58 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
it's just that no one's seriously tried to enforce them for the past 10 years at least.

"At least" is right. It's closer to 30 years. It started slowly in the 60s, picked up steam in the 70s, the 80s brought us the "one time only" amnesty, and the 90s were even worse. This has to stop.

10 posted on 12/08/2003 3:40:33 PM PST by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
Are we supposed to let our local police department withdraw all personnel from an area, have crime skyrocket as a consequence, and then tolerate arguments from them that the criminal law "doesn't work" and "has to be changed" in order to "recognize the reality of the role violent criminals play in our community"?

Unfortunately that is exactly the way we have done it. I may live to see the return of Jesus, but will never live to see our country healed again.

11 posted on 12/08/2003 3:41:16 PM PST by itsahoot (The lesser of two evils, is evil still...Alan Keyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
I was going to say essentially the same thing, except I would have given special mention to GWB.
12 posted on 12/08/2003 4:08:42 PM PST by VMI70 (...but two Wrights made an airplane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
It's not that our immigration laws don't work--

We've also got every kind of pandering politician promising to get them amnesty, free college, free health care --- not a promise anymore --- it's in the new Medicare bill--- and whatever else they want if they come here illegally. Social Security benefits are next for any citizen of Mexico who claims to have used a stolen Social Security number for 18 months.

13 posted on 12/08/2003 4:32:18 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
"recognize the reality of the role violent criminals play in our community"?

Nicely done!

14 posted on 12/08/2003 5:39:20 PM PST by TLI (...........ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster; FairOpinion; FoxFang; FITZ; moehoward; Nea Wood; Joe Hadenuf; sangoo; ...
American citizens have suffered as a result of the failure to deter illegal entry. We've experienced higher rates of crime, had to compete with non-citizens for basic social services, and endured longer waits for emergency health care.

Ping!

15 posted on 12/09/2003 12:47:52 AM PST by JustPiper (Teach the Children to fight Liberalism ! They will be voting in 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VMI70; AAABEST
I hear this said all the time about votes. I can't believe all of these politicians are willing to supplant the sovereignity of the U.S. just for votes. I don't know what it is but there has to be something else that they are getting out this other than just votes.

This issue will destroy America for all time if we don't do something to stop it.

16 posted on 12/09/2003 5:13:49 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
no one's seriously tried to enforce them for the past 10 years at least.

Bump. You are correct, sir. Before Clinton (I hesitate to call that B.C.) there was at least some effort to catch and deport. Employers didn't hire them at will. They would at least run if they saw a cop. Now they spit on us.
17 posted on 12/09/2003 9:09:55 AM PST by johnb838 (Mr Bush, build *us* a wall...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DumpsterDiver
Thanks for your post -- you saved me the trouble on the 30 years part.

I'll again ask the questions I've been asking for years: if our own government is selective about which laws it chooses to ignore, why can't we mere citizens have the same right?

And if others can break the law by coming here illegally and enjoy the "instant" benefits of American citizenship, what is the real value of our citizenship in the first place? With the arrival of every illegal alien our scofflaw "justice" system chooses to ignore, the value of every citizen's birthright is diluted.

18 posted on 12/09/2003 9:19:10 AM PST by Bernard Marx (I have noted that persons with bad judgment are most insistent that we do what they think best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
This article is obviously correct, and reminds me of an Orwell quote:

“We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men.” -- George Orwell
19 posted on 12/09/2003 9:35:42 AM PST by spodefly (This is my tagline. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
had to compete with non-citizens for basic social services, and endured longer waits for emergency health care.

Last night my one year old grandson had a high fever that wouldn't go down, his parents took him to an emergency room (Orange County California). They waited almost two hours while watching the illegals get treated for non-emergency ailments, they finally left in disgust, deciding that their child would be better off at home.

They complained to the desk nurse, who was apologetic, but shrugged her shoulders, saying "our hands are tied, we have no choice but to treat them whether it's an emergency or not". Entire families of non-English speakers, non-paying patients were there, and the nurse said that this was an ordinary night in the E.R.

Dana Rohrabacher's bill regarding reporting of illegals demanding treatment should be passed, though I doubt that the cowards in Washington will have the balls to do it.

20 posted on 12/09/2003 10:40:04 AM PST by janetgreen (TANCREDO FOR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson