Yeah. Like I said, I don't follow it closely, but I also think it gives me a a more impartial view. I suppose a playoff system would add 3 weeks to the season right? I suppose that is doable. If the season is lengthen by one week, and then OU, for example, doesn't need to play North Texas or University of Tulsa.
Actually a playoff system would only need to add 2 weeks after the bowls. Take the 4 BCS bowl winners, match them up in 2 semi-finals, and then have a REAL national championship game. Make the semi-finals into home games for the 2 highest ranked teams coming out of the BCS bowls, but have a caveat that a conference champ gets to host over a wildcard(even if the wildcard is ranked higher), thus keeping more meaning to the regular season and conf. champ. Then play the national championship at a neutral site bowl, so the BCS goes from 4 to 5 bowls, rotated among those bowls that are interested(the Rose may not want to give up New Years Day, even for the NC game.)
That gives us an easy 8 team playoff, with little disruption and minimal impact on the existing bowls.
If 8 isn't enough, it can later be expanded out to include conf. champ games and wildcard playoffs(using other existing bowls).
Here's my proposal from a couple of years ago:
A playoff that saves the bowls and quiets the critics