Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Religion in schools draws ire of ACLU
Lawerence Journal-World ^ | 12/03/03/ | Tim Carpenter

Posted on 12/03/2003 7:46:35 AM PST by Holly_P

Baldwin public school officials are violating the U.S. Constitution's separation of church and state, the Douglas County chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union said Tuesday.

The ACLU urged the school district to investigate elementary schools allowing a Christian minister dressed as Santa Claus to discuss the meaning of Christmas, referral of students who appear to need guidance to Christian resources and granting Christian "missionaries" access to students in after-school programs.

A letter outlining the ACLU's concerns was sent to the Baldwin school board, but the organization appears to be targeting Baldwin Supt. Jim White.

"I think this superintendent doesn't understand the separation of church and state," said Mary Davidson, president of the Douglas County chapter of ACLU. "He should see the error of his ways and repent."

White said he received the ACLU's letter and wrote a reply requesting more details about the complaints.

"So that we might be able to follow up to see if there's anything we should do," he said.

White said he didn't think the district was violating the law.

Davidson said concerns about sectarian religious activity were reported to the ACLU by parents of children in the Baldwin district. The letter sent to the Baldwin board was dated Nov. 25.

Board members Blaine Cone and Stacy Cohen said they hadn't received copies of the ACLU letter from the district as of Tuesday. Both were sent e-mail copies.

"I'm not going to make any comments on it," Cone said of the ACLU's letter.

She said there were differing opinions among parents about the use of Christian themes in schools.

"It's fine with some people," Cone said. "I think any community is going to have those for it and those against it."

But Cohen said she viewed proselytizing in a public school on behalf of any religion as "completely inappropriate." The district's policy handbook bans exhibition of religious preference in Baldwin schools, she said.

She said an incident last year should have served as a reminder of the rules.

In December 2002, parents in the district complained that a pastor dressed as Santa Claus visited Baldwin, Vinland and Marion Springs schools to share with students his thoughts about Jesus.

"I was outraged by having Santa come to the school at an assembly that all kids were required to attend," Cohen said. "I was outraged as a community member."

Davidson said a repeat performance by Santa impersonator Gregg Childress shouldn't be scheduled.

White invited Childress to the schools last year but said Tuesday it was unlikely he would again.

"We may not have any Santa Claus come just to make sure we don't have any entanglements," he said.

The ACLU asked that the parents' latest concerns be investigated by officials of the southern Douglas County school district.

"If they are unfounded, we thank you for your cooperation in preserving the rights of all Baldwin citizens," the letter says. "However, if any of these allegations are factual, we urge you to direct administration to comply with federal law."

In Lawrence, the district's policy forbids "celebration of any particular religious holidays." The influence of religion can be part of the curriculum, but the policy states that at no time can there be preference shown for any one religion.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: aclu; religion; schools

1 posted on 12/03/2003 7:46:36 AM PST by Holly_P
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Holly_P
I think the ACLU doesn't understand the separation of church and state. They need to get a life!
2 posted on 12/03/2003 7:50:52 AM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holly_P
"Christian minister dressed as Santa Claus to discuss the meaning of Christmas"


I kinda side with the ACLU here. Satan Claus has turned Christmas into a materialistic holiday where children expect to receive more plastic toys Made in Taiwan or China. This crushing materialism has done more to make people forget the true meaning of Christmas, which has nothing to do with some bearded fat man, and has everything to do with the birth of the Savior. For a minister to don the clothing of Santa Claus and thus espouse this entitlement/materialist mentality is disgraceful. He'd have been better off dressing as a shepherd to represent to true meaning of Christmas.

/dons flame suit
3 posted on 12/03/2003 8:08:39 AM PST by Blzbba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Blzbba
I kinda side with the ACLU here.

No you don't. Your reasons are divergent.

For a minister to don the clothing of Santa Claus and thus espouse this entitlement/materialist mentality is disgraceful.

This is really a stupid statement since it has already been stated that his intended purpose was to tell the true Christmas story.

He'd have been better off dressing as a shepherd to represent to true meaning of Christmas.

If the children's concept of Christmas is wrapped up in the conventional Sana Claus, then using that image with the true story of Christmas, will help the childern to relate. Should the minister not wear a cross, since so many of them are sold as just jewelry?

5 posted on 12/03/2003 8:38:42 AM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper
"This is really a stupid statement since it has already been stated that his intended purpose was to tell the true Christmas story. "


Right. So why the need to dress as Santa, which has nothing to do with the true Christmas story?


"If the children's concept of Christmas is wrapped up in the conventional Sana Claus, then using that image with the true story of Christmas, will help the childern to relate. Should the minister not wear a cross, since so many of them are sold as just jewelry?"

No - it will only serve to further entrench the children's views that Santa, and his infernal materialism, is as much as part of Christmas as is Jesus' birth.

Your 'cross' argument is weak, as the cross itself symbolizes Christianity, and is never to be considered as "just jewelry". Whereas, Santa shouldn't be pushed as the main symbol of Christmas, which is what you're espousing here.
6 posted on 12/03/2003 10:12:45 AM PST by Blzbba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson