To: Tailgunner Joe
I don't think women should be in combat, or exposed to it. Not because SOME are not capable, but because of the disruption to the effective functioning of the military.
I risk my life having children, and my sanity bringing them up. Men risk their lives to keep me safe while I'm doing it. (Thanks, guys!) I think it's fair.
15 posted on
11/26/2003 6:57:58 PM PST by
Tax-chick
(It's hard to see the rainbow through glasses dark as these.)
To: Tax-chick
"I risk my life having children, and my sanity bringing them up. Men risk their lives to keep me safe while I'm doing it. (Thanks, guys!) I think it's fair."
I like your thinking - there are some very capable women out there - if they choose to serve OK! But not in combat. WACS, WAVES, WRENS - did I leave some out and am open from a hit by the PC police? Have been around and functioned just fine in support roles.
Women on ships is stupid. Women MPs I can go for. Where is the pic of that tough BABE MP who took the Iraqui down and boxes with her counterparts - posted a few weeks ago?
22 posted on
11/26/2003 7:16:33 PM PST by
Bobibutu
To: Tax-chick
I risk my life having children, and my sanity bringing them up. Men risk their lives to keep me safe while I'm doing it. (Thanks, guys!) I think it's fair.
That makes too much sense. Of course, there are men who risk their sanity in bringing up children, too. But I can't disagree with you.
39 posted on
11/27/2003 11:03:24 AM PST by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
To: Tax-chick
I don't think women should be in combat, or exposed to it. Not because SOME are not capable, but because of the disruption to the effective functioning of the military. I find men rolling grenades into the officers' tent to be more disruptive to the effective functioning of the military.
69 posted on
01/07/2004 6:36:09 AM PST by
rabidralph
(All your debate are belong to us.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson