Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Medicare prescription-drug bill is 1,071 pages
The Liberty Committee ^ | Kent Snyder

Posted on 11/18/2003 5:17:22 AM PST by FlyLow

The Medicare prescription-drug bill is 1,071 pages. Members of Congress will not get a copy of the bill until Wednesday or Thursday leaving them only one or two days to read, study and understand it before casting their vote on Friday or Saturday. Most House members were barred from the closed-door negotiations, even though special interests were consulted along the way.

Summaries of parts of the bill are being slowly and selectively released to members of Congress, the media and the public by the staff of the committee that wrote it. We will have only a few days to learn, in fact, what is in those 1,071 pages.

But we don't need to know every detail because supporters of the bill have already admitted that this new, never-ending "entitlement" will cost taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars and, more likely, over $1 trillion. Of course, the politicians making this decision will be dead when the children of today who are stuck paying for it, realize what has been done to them and are able to vote.

To politicians, the only future that matters is the next election. But as parents, grandparents, great grandparents, and responsible American citizens today, the future for us is not measured in such a callous and self-serving way.

The National Taxpayers Union published a chart that tells us what kind of future our children and grandchildren will have if we allow this Medicare drug bill to become law. The chart compares the yearly Medicare expenditures as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) without the prescription drug plan and with it. The numbers were compiled from the Congressional Budget Office and the 2003 Medicare Trustees report.

Without a drug "benefit," the percentage of GDP necessary to pay for Medicare increases from 2.5% to just under 10% over 75 years. With a drug "benefit," it increases to just under 40%! That's right. Not 40% of tax revenue or 40% of all government costs (that would be bad enough), but 40% of the total the U.S. produces in a year!

THINK ABOUT IT.

The yearly Medicare expenditure will consume close to 40% of our nation's GDP. But, once again, politicians aren't concerned about that far into the future.

Urge your congressional delegation to strongly oppose this Republican socialism. Tell the politicians to be concerned about the future -- the future beyond the next election. Send your message now by going to http://capwiz.com/liberty/issues/alert/?alertid=4165501&type=CO

Here's a link to the graph (pdf format): http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/deadlycombo.pdf

http://www.thelibertycommittee.org


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: healthcare; medicare; prescriptiondrugs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 11/18/2003 5:17:23 AM PST by FlyLow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
So much for the tax cuts.
2 posted on 11/18/2003 5:17:52 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
Luckily the Republicans are in power, and we all know that they are against socialized medicine.
3 posted on 11/18/2003 5:24:28 AM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
The politicians are claiming that this entitlement program is "voluntary".

What that means is that everybody without good insurance will sign up for the 25% discount and yearly cap. Then insurance companies will start raising their rates to force the holdouts onto the program.

FWIW, I called both my senators' offices yesterday and urged a no vote. At least when my children are living in poverty because of this, I can tell them that I did something.

4 posted on 11/18/2003 5:36:36 AM PST by snopercod (And if it is a despot you would dethrone, see first that his throne erected within you is destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: FlyLow
The Medicare prescription-drug bill is 1,071 pages.

I'm sure that our Congress critters will read, and understand, every one of those pages before voting on them.

6 posted on 11/18/2003 5:41:49 AM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: per loin
"Luckily the Republicans are in power, and we all know that they are against socialized medicine."

Well said. I could not have said it better.

And unfortunately, I have deduced from the rantings contained in many "posts" here at FreeRepublic.com, many are proud of their "Rebpublican" vote.

7 posted on 11/18/2003 5:42:49 AM PST by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tahiti
Republicans are gun shy after being accused of wanting to throw grandma out in the cold.
8 posted on 11/18/2003 5:44:47 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
But liberals have accused conservatives for decades now of being insensitive to the poor, the elderly, minorities, etc., to try to shame conservatives into backing big government programs. Conservatives can cave and join the liberals or stand on principle and pursue freedom (i.e., freedom from more government confiscation of wealth). Republicans would be more effective if they became "gun shy" of conservatives who would no longer support them when there is no meaningful difference between Republicans and Democrats.
9 posted on 11/18/2003 5:50:47 AM PST by reelfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: per loin
Luckily the Republicans are in power, and we all know that they are against socialized medicine

We are also lucky Bush has stood up to Teddy and has started to defund and dismantle the Dept of Education
10 posted on 11/18/2003 5:55:59 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tahiti; per loin
There was a period in European history, back in the middle ages just prior to the State claiming exclusive right to conduct war, when wars were fought almost entirely by mercenary armies.

These mercenaries generally knew each other, sometime grew up with each other, often fought on the same side with each other, and were basically friends with each other.

One famous battle (I forget which, or the exact details) involved two large mercenary armies going against each other in "mortal combat" from sunup till sundown. These profesional warriors, viscious killers if you will, all kenw each other. At the end of this day of fierce fighting there was not a single casualty. It seems that, rather than actually hurt each other, they had just engaged in a giant shoving match to impress their employers with the ferocity of their opposition to each other.

I know this is off topic, but, somehow, for reasons not understood, It just comes into my mind on threads like this.

11 posted on 11/18/2003 6:01:29 AM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Then do I get to volunteer not to pay into it?
12 posted on 11/18/2003 6:06:28 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: templar
Were those two mercenary armies known as the "Lumbering, Not-too-bright Pachyderms" and the "Shrill, Vindictive @sses"?
13 posted on 11/18/2003 6:13:28 AM PST by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: templar
Well, I have heard tell that "Knights fight for honor and mercenaries fight for gold."

Unfortunately, the congresspersons are not knights. They are simply bent on bringing even more socialism to the practice of medicine. And, I think you make a nice point in comparing them to the mercenaries of old.

I see this whole Medicare prescription drug bill as a replay of New Deal legislation. Seniors who support this have absolutely no idea how much their "free" drugs are going to cost them, and their grandchildren's children. It's sad.

14 posted on 11/18/2003 6:38:54 AM PST by MaggieCarta (Somebody please tell the AARP to "Grow Up")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
W loves us and wants to bring us all under his protective wings.
15 posted on 11/18/2003 7:00:11 AM PST by warchild9 (Never trust a politician who's never held a job in his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Then do I get to volunteer not to pay into it?

Sorry, that part is not voluntary. This is just another "robin hood" scheme cynically designed to buy votes from the geriatric set.

16 posted on 11/18/2003 7:21:01 AM PST by snopercod (And if it is a despot you would dethrone, see first that his throne erected within you is destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
If Democrats are stalling this, God bless 'em!

They are stalling it. I called Sen. Edwards office yesterday and the woman there said he would vote against it as it stands, due to section 631.

I can't post the link since it changes every five minutes, but if you go to http://thomas.loc.gov and enter S.1 for the bill number, then select the "Public Print" version, you can read it yourself.

17 posted on 11/18/2003 7:24:17 AM PST by snopercod (And if it is a despot you would dethrone, see first that his throne erected within you is destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FlyLow
Any ethical congressman would vote NO simply because they know they haven't read it and understood it, and therefore can't, in good conscience, support it.
18 posted on 11/18/2003 7:34:46 AM PST by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Please stop sullying the name of Robin Hood by attaching it to the negative side of government theivery.

Robin Hood took from a tyrannical GOVERNMENT who had taxed the good citizens into poverty and he simply returned their OWN MONEY to them.

Our government is Little John, buying favors and votes with OUR MONEY, not Robin Hood.
19 posted on 11/18/2003 7:41:01 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: per loin
Luckily the Republicans are in power, and we all know that they are against socialized medicine.

Yup. I get warm and fuzzies when I think about how much they are "helping" us every day.

20 posted on 11/18/2003 7:53:59 AM PST by zeugma (If you eat a live toad first thing in the morning, nothing worse will happen all day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson