Skip to comments.
Report: Nearly 150 plant workers tested positive for drugs (at nuclear power plants)
Times Leader (Wilkes-Barre, PA) ^
| 11/14/2003
Posted on 11/14/2003 4:37:03 AM PST by Born Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: Born Conservative
Wonder what test they used?
2
posted on
11/14/2003 4:43:01 AM PST
by
dakine
To: Born Conservative
Would that mean then, that many people can use drugs...and still perform normally at their jobs?
3
posted on
11/14/2003 4:46:31 AM PST
by
stuartcr
To: Born Conservative
Homer was found with massive blood levels of illicit donut dough.
4
posted on
11/14/2003 4:49:19 AM PST
by
friendly
(Man is so made that whenever anything fires his soul, impossibilities vanish.)
To: friendly
5
posted on
11/14/2003 4:51:36 AM PST
by
OXENinFLA
(A good solution applied with vigor now is better than a perfect solution applied ten minutes later.)
To: Born Conservative
Boot 'em. This is too serious an area to be breaking the rules (and the law).
To: ClintonBeGone
Suppose a person consumed two glasses of wine with supper. What level percentage of alcohol would be present in the blood 8 hours later?
7
posted on
11/14/2003 4:57:50 AM PST
by
snopercod
(Lawyer: One skilled in the circumvention of the law - Ambrose Bierce)
To: dakine
"Wonder what test they used?"
Probably GC-MS (gas-chromatography coupled to a mass spectrometer). Wet-chemical tests can be used for coarse screening, but any positives that show up are typically re-tested by GC-MS to eliminate "false positives".
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Born Conservative
As a former nuclear power plant worker, I want everybody here to understand that these tests are used for punishment.
If the boss doesn't like you, you will have to pee in a bottle or have your blood drawn every week. Word will get around that you are a "suspected drug user" and the management is watching you.
If you are a good little syncophant, you will only have to take the test once a year or so.
10
posted on
11/14/2003 5:01:22 AM PST
by
snopercod
(Lawyer: One skilled in the circumvention of the law - Ambrose Bierce)
To: OXENinFLA
DOH!
11
posted on
11/14/2003 5:02:10 AM PST
by
friendly
(Man is so made that whenever anything fires his soul, impossibilities vanish.)
To: Wonder Warthog
Thanks, I've searching for good oral-tests that are better then the 85% accuracy now available, the need for immediate test results is huge in industry now a days....
12
posted on
11/14/2003 5:02:16 AM PST
by
dakine
To: seamole
So then one would have to be drinking (or using cough syrup) on the job to produce a .04 level?
13
posted on
11/14/2003 5:03:38 AM PST
by
snopercod
(Lawyer: One skilled in the circumvention of the law - Ambrose Bierce)
To: snopercod
or had a whole bottle of whiskey for dinner.
14
posted on
11/14/2003 5:04:55 AM PST
by
glock rocks
(just keep yer hands where I can see them.)
To: snopercod
NONE
15
posted on
11/14/2003 5:09:21 AM PST
by
Vaduz
To: Vaduz; glock rocks
16
posted on
11/14/2003 5:23:04 AM PST
by
snopercod
(Lawyer: One skilled in the circumvention of the law - Ambrose Bierce)
To: snopercod
Suppose a person consumed two glasses of wine with supper. What level percentage of alcohol would be present in the blood 8 hours later?
I'm not an expert, but I would guess probably none. Why?
To: stuartcr
Would that mean then, that many people can use drugs...and still perform normally at their jobs? Performing normally is not the key issue, it's how they would perform under adverse circumstances,i.e., emergencies. 'Dooood! whazzt ringin' noise?', is not want to here when the reactor farts. Many people can drive drunk as long as they are not required to react precisely.
18
posted on
11/14/2003 5:29:27 AM PST
by
tbpiper
To: tbpiper
It seems though, that if the only way to tell if someone is using drugs is after the fact via a urine test, that there are/were a lot of people in both everyday, and emergency situations, that were using drugs. It would seem that the 'dood...' analogy isn't really valid.
19
posted on
11/14/2003 5:37:49 AM PST
by
stuartcr
To: ClintonBeGone
Let me interject and assume that snopercod may actually consume two glasses of wine with supper.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson