Posted on 11/14/2003 4:37:03 AM PST by Born Conservative
Probably GC-MS (gas-chromatography coupled to a mass spectrometer). Wet-chemical tests can be used for coarse screening, but any positives that show up are typically re-tested by GC-MS to eliminate "false positives".
If the boss doesn't like you, you will have to pee in a bottle or have your blood drawn every week. Word will get around that you are a "suspected drug user" and the management is watching you.
If you are a good little syncophant, you will only have to take the test once a year or so.
Widmark called the hourly decrease in BAC his Widmark ß (beta) Factor. It's widely agreed now that normal humans metabolize, or burn off, EtOH at a rate of 0.010% to 0.024% per hour, with an average ß factor of 0.017% per hour.
I'm not an expert, but I would guess probably none. Why?
Performing normally is not the key issue, it's how they would perform under adverse circumstances,i.e., emergencies. 'Dooood! whazzt ringin' noise?', is not want to here when the reactor farts. Many people can drive drunk as long as they are not required to react precisely.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.