Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A "Painless" Death?
Weekly Standard ^ | 11/12/2003 12:00:00 AM | Wesley J. Smith

Posted on 11/12/2003 11:33:12 AM PST by bluejay

MANY WHO SUPPORT Terri Schiavo's threatened dehydration assert that removing a feeding tube from a profoundly cognitively disabled person results in a painless and gentle ending. But is this really true? After all, it would be agonizing if you or I were locked in a room for two weeks and deprived of all food and water. So, why should we believe that cognitively disabled patients experience the deprivation differently simply because they receive nourishment through a feeding tube instead of by mouth?

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: pvs; schiavo; sherecovered; terri; terrischiavo; terrischindler; terrisfight; theoreillyfactor
I've been thinking about this for a while; I still can't quite understand why it is so important for this woman to die.
1 posted on 11/12/2003 11:33:12 AM PST by bluejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bluejay
You are not the only one who wonders why she must die. God wants her husband to explain it as well.
2 posted on 11/12/2003 11:40:00 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluejay
"...why it is so important for this woman to die."

So Michael can experience 'closure' and get on with his life, (and his new wife, and their two kids, and Terri's estate, etc.)

3 posted on 11/12/2003 11:40:09 AM PST by NicknamedBob (Tag line roulette wheel spinning, ... spinning, ... (FREE SPIN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluejay
What a horrible way to die. We aren't allowed to do it to the worst of killers. Yet not only do some want Terri to die, but also be tortured.

Incidentally, others in similar states have survived. There have been cases of people in coma for 8, 16, and 19 years and then recovered.

4 posted on 11/12/2003 11:44:04 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
It is my wish that MS gets to explain that to God (face to face) before Terri is murdered. I dont advocate violence, but this monster must be stopped!!
5 posted on 11/12/2003 12:02:35 PM PST by trussell (PRAYER WORKS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bluejay

She Recovered from a Persistent Vegetative State

Thursday, November 06, 2003

This is a partial transcript from The O'Reilly Factor, November 5, 2003.

Watch The O'Reilly Factor weeknights at 8 p.m. and 11 p.m. ET and listen to the Radio Factor!

BILL O'REILLY, HOST:  In the Back of the Book segment tonight, the parents of Terri Schiavo (search) are hoping for a miracle.  Their daughter has been in a vegetative state for 13 years, as you know.  Ms. Schiavo's husband wants her to die, and so do many in the State of Florida.

But listen to this.  In 1995, Kate Adamson was in a similar position.  She was in a vegetative state after suffering a stroke.

For almost 70 days, she was totally unresponsive.  Doctors finally pulled her feeding tube.  And, for eight days, she was dying.

Then Ms. Adamson began responding on her own.  Doctors quickly put the feeding tube back in, and she recovered.

Joining us now from Los Angeles is Kate Adamson and her husband, Steven Klugman.  Ms. Adamson has written a book called Kate's Journey: Triumph Over Adversity (search).

So, in the Schiavo case, Ms. Adamson, you must have very strong feelings about that.

KATE ADAMSON, AUTHOR, KATE'S JOURNEY: TRIUMPH OVER ADVERSITY:  Yes, I do.  I have a huge prospective on what Terri is going through.

O'REILLY:  And what would that be?

ADAMSON:  Well, especially after having gone through this myself and the doctors assuming that I was in a vegetative state, when, in fact, I was totally aware of what was going on around me.

O'REILLY:  Could you hear -- could you hear people and see them and all?

ADAMSON:  I could see and hear everything going on around me, and I had no way...

O'REILLY:  Really?

ADAMSON:  ... of communicating with anyone.

O'REILLY:  So you were like paralyzed in every way, but you could hear...

ADAMSON:  Completely paralyzed.

O'REILLY:  You could hear the words, you knew your husband was in the room when he was there and all of that?

ADAMSON:  Exactly.  I knew what I wanted to say.  I had -- I was completely paralyzed.  I had no way of communicating at all.

O'REILLY:  This is amazing.  It's like an Edgar Allen Poe (search) story.  So when they took...

ADAMSON:  It's like a nightmare.

O'REILLY:  When they took the feeding tube out, what went through your mind?

ADAMSON:  When the feeding tube was turned off for eight days, I was -- thought I was going insane.  I was screaming out don't you know I need to eat.  And even up until that point, I had been having a bagful of Ensure as my nourishment that was going through the feeding tube.  At that point, it sounded pretty good.  I just wanted something.  The fact that I had nothing, the hunger pains overrode every thought I had.

O'REILLY:  So you were feeling pain when they removed your tube?

ADAMSON:  Yes.  Oh, absolutely.  Absolutely.  To say that -- especially when Michael [Schiavo] on national TV had mentioned last week that it's a pretty painless thing to have the feeding tube removed.  It is the exact opposite.  It was sheer torture, Bill.

O'REILLY:  It's just amazing.

ADAMSON:  Sheer torture.  And they're having it ripped out.

O'REILLY: All right.  How did you come out of this now?  How did the doctors know to put the tube back in?

ADAMSON:  Well, first of all, having Steven as a strong advocate and not only being an attorney but yelling and screaming and insisting, insisting, that they do that.

O'REILLY:  All right, but -- so your husband, an attorney, Steven, insisted, and you...

ADAMSON:  Right.

O'REILLY:  What did you get, a court order, Counselor, to get the tube back into your wife's system.

STEVEN KLUGMAN, HUSBAND OF STROKE VICTIM:  I threatened to sue the whole world, and I told them that their best course was to try to save her, and maybe they wouldn't get sued...

O'REILLY:  OK.  So they finally...

KLUGMAN:  ... and they finally decided that was...

O'REILLY:  ... listened to you after eight days.  They put the tube back.  And then how long did it take for you to come out of the vegetative state?

ADAMSON:  Well, it was a matter of time, and, of course, when you're in that position, I had no conception of time at all.  I wasn't able to start eating food again.  I had to start on pureed foods and still have the feeding tube turned on because of my weight loss.

KLUGMAN:  There was a good week to two weeks where she was aware, she was communicating, and I couldn't get anyone to believe me.  Just like the...

O'REILLY:  How did you know?

KLUGMAN:  ... the family.

O'REILLY: How did you know?

KLUGMAN:  But I would -- I'd ask her to blink once if she could understand me and she would.

O'REILLY:  Well, I mean that's pretty obvious.  A doctor comes in, and you do the demonstration.

KLUGMAN:  The doctor -- well, she would be so weak after blinking once or twice, she couldn't do it again for an hour or more.

O'REILLY:  I see.

KLUGMAN:  These people are so weak.

ADAMSON:  You know, Bill, I had to blink every -- that's how I communicated, was blinking.

O'REILLY:  Yes, but how long did it take you once they reinserted the feeding tube into you, Kate, for you then to convince the doctors that you were aware?

ADAMSON:  Well, I couldn't convince the doctors myself.  I couldn't speak.  I had no ability.  So Steven had to be my advocate.

O'REILLY:  OK.  But how long did it take?

Mr. Klugman, how long did it take?

KLUGMAN:  Two to three weeks.

O'REILLY:  OK.  So two to three weeks, she came back on the feeding, and then she came out of the vegetative state?

KLUGMAN:  She was never in the vegetative state.  That was just...

O'REILLY:  OK, OK, but she came...

KLUGMAN:  ... their description.

O'REILLY:  When did she get cognizant that everybody knew she was functioning?

KLUGMAN:  She was -- she was probably always cognizant.  She was, in fact, operated on at one point, and they treated her as though she was a vegetable, didn't give her enough anesthetic, and she felt the entire operation.

O'REILLY:  Wow.

All right.  I'm going to try one more time.  When did you come out of it so that you could speak and all of that?  How long did it take?

ADAMSON:  Well, it wasn't until I was in acute rehab for the three months and during that whole process.

O'REILLY:  Three months.  All right.

ADAMSON:  So, in fact, I was on a week to week basis with -- in terms of how I was recovering whether the insurance company would still keep me in there.

O'REILLY:  Well, it's an amazing, amazing story, and nobody could say whether the Schiavo case would be that way, but, you know, to hear this makes everybody think.

KLUGMAN:  It's possible.

O'REILLY:  Thank you very much, both of you, for coming on The Factor.  We appreciate it.

ADAMSON:  Thank you.

Copy: Content and Programming Copyright 2003 Fox News Network, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Transcription Copyright 2003 eMediaMillWorks, Inc. (f/k/a Federal Document Clearing House, Inc.), which takes sole responsibility for the accuracy of the transcription. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No license is granted to the user of this material except for the user's personal or internal use and, in such case, only one copy may be printed, nor shall user use any material for commercial purposes or in any fashion that may infringe upon Fox News Network, Inc.'s and eMediaMillWorks, Inc.'s copyrights or other proprietary rights or interests in the material. This is not a legal transcript for purposes of litigation.

Search sources include Google, Ask Jeeves, WebCrawler


Jobs at FOX News Channel.
Terms of use.  Privacy Statement.  For FOXNews.com comments write to
foxnewsonline@foxnews.com;  For FOX News Channel comments write to
comments@foxnews.com
© Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2003 ComStock, Inc.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Copyright 2003 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved.
All market data delayed 20 minutes.

6 posted on 11/12/2003 12:06:43 PM PST by walford (Dogmatism swings both ways)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah; Desdemona; MarMema; sweetliberty; floriduh voter; kimmie7; NautiNurse
ping
7 posted on 11/14/2003 1:38:46 AM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Shills from attorney were in the vigil crowd spreading the word that "it's painless". Funny, that they've all disappeared since Jeb signed the Executive Order on 10-21-03.

The only reason it's painless is because they use morphine... Starve dehydrate and medicate. (sounded like Jesse Jackson). FV

8 posted on 11/14/2003 4:56:56 AM PST by floriduh voter (Breaking at baynews9.com...conservative-spirit.org FR Site)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bluejay
There's absolutely no reason whatsoever why Terri should be killed. She sits in a chair during the day and when she wants to get tucked in at night, she expresses her wishes to turn in for the night. She communicates, granted not in English.

IT'S ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS and we're trying to stop this sort of thing here and now, in the great state of Florida. Our Judges are on tippy toes right now. They should be. I for one think that HEADS WILL ROLL over how this got so far...ABSOLUTELY INCREDULOUS AND HEINOUS!!!

9 posted on 11/14/2003 5:00:14 AM PST by floriduh voter (Breaking at baynews9.com...conservative-spirit.org FR Site)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluejay; pc93; sweetliberty
Doctors: Terri case not 'death with dignity' issue
Removal of feeding tube called 'state-sponsored euthanasia'
October 22, 2003

But Dr. Jane Orient with the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, or AAPS, claims the opposite is true: "Dehydration is a cruel, painful death."

"It is unconscionable that the state ordered removal of her feeding tube in the first place – it's nothing less than state-sponsored euthanasia," maintains Orient. "She is not dependent on advanced medical interventions. Nothing is mechanically pumping her blood, or forcing oxygen into her lungs. She is simply being fed through a gastrostomy tube."

Last week the General Assembly of the Catholic Medical Association passed a resolution that concurred with Orient's view. It declared removal of Terri's feeding tube "without first undertaking rehabilitation therapy to ascertain her ability to swallow and digest nourishment" constitutes "depriving her of life without due process of law," according to Florida Statutes Section 744, 3211.

Would we allow a retarded child to be starved to death?" queries Orient. "Where are the 'compassionate end-of-life' groups such as the Robert Wood Johnson 'Last Acts' initiative, and why aren't they weighing in on this?"

---------------------------------------------------------

Federal Judge Dismisses Parents' Lawsuit in Terri Schiavo Case
October 2003

...the hospice workers responsible for removing the tube may have to choose between violating Judge Greer's order or Florida law. Under Title 46, Chapter 825, Section 102 (3)(a) of the Florida Criminal Statutes, the crime of "neglect of an elderly person or disabled adult" occurs as the result of:

"A caregiver's failure or omission to provide an elderly person or disabled adult with the care, supervision and services necessary to maintain the elderly person's or disabled adult's physical and mental health, including, but not limited to, food, nutrition, clothing, shelter, supervision, medicine and medical services that a prudent person would consider essential for the well-being of the elderly person or disabled adult."

-----------------------------------------------------

Interesting Timeline about legalizing feeding tube removal:

May 1998 - George Felos is hired and files a petition in Court to remove Terri's feeding tube.

April 6, 1999 - House Bill 2131 was introduced in the legislature by the Florida Elder Affairs & Long-Term Care Committee to amend Section 765 (Civil Rights) of the Florida Statutes.

Two weeks later, the legislature Committee on Judiciary recommmended that House Bill 2131 should also change the Section 765.101 legal definition of life prolonging procedures to add: "INCLUDING ARTIFICIALLY PROVIDED SUSTENENCE AND HYDRATION, WHICH SUSTAINS, RESTORES, OR SUPPLANTS A SPONTANEOUS VITAL FUNCTION".

Oct 1, 1999 - Senate Bill 2228 (formerly HB2131) becomes law changing Section 765.101 of the Florida Statutes to include the above.

Jan 24, 2000 - Trial begins to decided whether to remove Terri's feeding tube.

Feb 11, 2000 - Judge Greer orders that Terri's feeding tube can be removed.

* * *

Did the Florida legislature knowingly or unknowingly pass a law that would apply specifically to Terri?...here's some very interesting reading that might help answer that question...

...Congressman Bilirakis congressman for many years. Now his son Gus Michael Bilirakis serves on the Suncoast Hospice Board of Directors.

Atty George Felos sat on the Hospice Board. Felos has been paid approximately $550,000.00. Judge Greer used to be on Hospice's Board too (ED: Chairman of the Board).


10 posted on 11/14/2003 5:18:48 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluejay
Thank you for posting this article.
11 posted on 11/14/2003 10:36:14 AM PST by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson