Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
"If everyone in the world can see the source code of the software, then we KNOW it does what it says it will do. "

Electronic voting seems nearly impossible to monitor to me. For secure voting, every single copy of the voting executable software and hardware needs to be verified, as well as every tabulating computer, network node, or anything else that touches the votes. Even with paper ticket receipts, how do you know your ticket matches the recorded vote unless it's the paper that is counted?

A paper receipt in machine & human readable form (old fashioned punch cards?) that is collected (after verification by the voter) for potential recount seems reasonably accountable, but loses much of the advantage of the electronic vote.

7 posted on 11/06/2003 6:01:39 PM PST by HangThemHigh (Entropy's not what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: HangThemHigh
A paper receipt in machine & human readable form (old fashioned punch cards?) that is collected (after verification by the voter) for potential recount seems reasonably accountable, but loses much of the advantage of the electronic vote.

Not really. Think of an electronic cash register. You get a receipt, the register prints out a large roll of corresponding receipts, and the data goes into the system. At the voting booth, a 1 foot wide roll could probably hold all the votes of the day. If not, you replace the roll.

8 posted on 11/06/2003 6:19:00 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson