Posted on 11/04/2003 6:43:32 PM PST by Happy2BMe
These tapes are an incredible archive of a span of communist Chinese stealing our national security secrets for a span of up to thirty years - courteousy of the Democratice Party of the United States.
(Macromedia Flash required. Get it HERE
It depends what "IS" is.
bttt to see later, thanks ! ...
These tapes are an incredible archive of a span of communist Chinese stealing our national security secrets for a span of up to thirty years - courteousy of the Democratice Party of the United States.
Thanks for sharing this ...
Naively believing they will forever sit on the sidelines while their natural resources dwindle and their billions become restless is wishful thinking at best.
And now along comes John Kerry - well, well.
he clintons didn't simply fail to warn President Bush about bin Laden. The clintons didn't simply fail for eight years to go after bin Laden. The clintons didn't simply fail to take bin Laden when offered by Sudan on a silver platter.
|
|
ohn Kerry says the war on terror is less about military might than about law enforcement. Even if we allow for his characteristic flatulence and opportunism, John Kerry's demagogically tortured parsing of President George W. Bush's war-as-the-last-resort pledge and the fact that Kerry's list of the "real issues facing Americans" does not include the one issue, namely terrorism, that renders all other issues moot -- (health care, education and money have very limited utility to the dead)-- reveal a fundamental--and fatal--misunderstanding of America's situation. When terrorists declare war on you and then proceed to kill you you are, perforce, at war. At that point, you really have only one decision to make: Do you fight the terrorists or do you surrender? Contrary to clinton/leftist-media spin, this war waged against America by the terrorists did not begin on September 11, 2001. The terrorists--bin Laden--had declared war on America repeatedly, had killed Americans repeatedly, throughout the clinton years. Remarkably, the same terrorists hit the same WTC building in 1993, and clinton, 15 minutes away from the devastation, didn't even bother to visit the site, preferring instead to add his old bromides on the economy to the pollution along the Jersey Turnpike. (Ironically, the legacy clinton would desperately, futilely seek throughout his life was right under his nose on that day in 1993; but he was too self-absorbed--too stupid, some would say--to see it.) And as for the September 11 attacks, they were planned in May 1998, on the clintons' watch, in the Khalden Camp in southeastern Afghanistan. The terrorists declared war on America on the clintons watch and the clintons surrendered. Democrats, from the clintons to Kerry, reflexively choose "surrender." President Bush chooses '"fight." Andrew Cuomo didn't call the Democrats "clueless" for no reason.
|
bill clinton admits: I DID NOT PROTECT AMERICA FROM TERRORISTS
(WHY THE CLINTONS, KERRY AND THE LEFT ARE DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA)
Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize
MANSOOR IJAZ
December 5, 2001
And THAT is why Hollywood, the liberal media, the Democratic Socialist Party of America continue to worship, harbor and fabricate endless smoke screens for both of the Clintons (and to elect them into high office and positions of power - Hillary, U.S. Intelligence Committee).
The Mary Jo White Memo:
|
||
ary Jo White's memo is documentation of the clintons' and Gorelick's willful, seditious malfeasance. The memo explicitly warned that the protective wall the clintons and Gorelick were busy erecting (doubtless to blind domestic law enforcement to the clintons' illegal foreign schemes) would (also) blind domestic law enforcement to terrorist plots foreign and domestic. From this it follows that Gorelick's Wall was not the clintons' and Gorelick's simple (albeit monumental) blunder. Rather, Gorelick's Wall was no less than the clintons' and Gorelick's malfeasance--willful, self-serving and seditious--with the metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 the sorry endpoint. NOTE: Bin Laden declared war on America throughout the clintons' watch. Had the clintons understood that this was war, not crime, that a terrorist war requires only one consenting player, Gorelick's Wall would be just another clintoncorruption footnote. "The Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him [bin Laden]. bill clinton It is critical to understand that this same terrorism-is-crime-not-war flawed, dangerous thinking animates John Kerry, and the left, generally. A post-9/11 America must never again put these dangerous pre-9/11 dinosaurs in any positions of leadership. To do so would be to place at grave risk no less than our very existence.
|
||
NEW virtual john kerry can bore + snowboard at the same time series (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE) johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com |
e would have it backwards and miss the point entirely if we were to attribute The Gorelick Wall and the attendant metastasis of al Qaeda during the clintons' watch, (which, incidentally, was then in its incipient stage and stoppable), to the '60s liberal mindset. Rampant '60s liberalism was not the underlying rationale for The Gorelick Wall. Rather, The Gorelick Wall was the underlying rationale for--The Gorelick Wall was (insofar as '60s liberalism was the Wall's apparent impetus) a cynical cover for --the willful, methodical malpractice and malfeasance that was the product of the virulent clinton strain of rampant '60s liberalism. While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding). The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style. Further confirmation of the Wall-as-cover-for-clinton-corruption thesis:
Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect. The Gorelick Wall is consistent with, and an international extension of, two essential acts committed in tandem, Filegate, the simultaneous empowering of the clintons and disemboweling of clinton adversaries, and the clinton Putsch, the firing and replacement of every U.S. attorney extant.
Allegations of international clinton crimes swirling around the White House in 1995 and beyond support The-Wall-as-cover-for-international-clinton-crimes thesis. Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.
|
||
|
Clinton had no knowledge of these instructions - none - NOTTA.
bump!
Your post # 4 for lurkers (and fans of hillary)/bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.