It seems after years of being ostracized, smokers' lungs appear to be suitable for transplants and may even be desirable to help reduce waiting times for those needing transplants.
1 posted on
11/03/2003 6:27:43 PM PST by
lockjaw02
To: lockjaw02
Did you see that line, evidently no problem under 20 pack years? So, a pack a day habit for 20 years is not even considered as extended...
2 posted on
11/03/2003 6:30:46 PM PST by
Judith Anne
(Cyanide, mercury, and botulinum toxin are medically and industrially useful friends to mankind.)
To: SheLion; Gabz; *puff_list; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; ...
ping
3 posted on
11/03/2003 6:32:29 PM PST by
lockjaw02
("The phenomenon of corruption is like the garbage. It has to be removed daily." -Ignacio)
To: lockjaw02
Gee, so now they decide they will "accept" donor lungs from smokers?????
What this tells me is that they should have been doing so all along.
My "orders" are very specific - friends or family only until they stop the discrimination against smokers.
7 posted on
11/03/2003 6:55:17 PM PST by
Gabz
(Smoke-gnatzies - small minds buzzing in your business - SWAT'EM)
To: lockjaw02
"the waiting time for a lung transplant has increased as has the number of patients who die while waiting for a transplant...." Jesus, God only knows how many people have suffered and/or died because of this stupid criteria. I swear the anti-smoking gnatzies are many times more dangerous to your health than cigarettes
I hope with this new common sense criteria they have an opt out list. I would love to see how strong the anti-smoking gnatzis convictions are if faced with the choice of
A) Taking a smoker's lungs
B) Death or at the very least living the rest of their pitful life in an Iron lung.
15 posted on
11/03/2003 8:02:11 PM PST by
qam1
(Don't Patikify New Jersey)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson