[Theodore R.]

Why worry about the "trolls"? They are simple to refute or if time does not permit a refutation, just ignore them.

[First Amendment]

I consider it useful to let people know - especially lurkers, media types and so on - that some people are here solely to disrupt the debate, and may in fact be agents of Schiavo, which is what some people here suspect "Harv" to have been.
Some, like ddep6 and Legerdemain, cannot be refuted because they just say the same thing over and over again and don't debate in a rational way. In fact, d6 just copies and pastes the same paragraphs. I asked for evidence citing the lack of a cortex and there was no response.

[kenth]

They are here for disruption only. They argue only for death and won't be swayed. The insidious arguments are those who argue for death while sugar-coating it in some freakish form of empathy.

They suck up time and bandwidth that could better be used on email, fax and phone campaigns. I'll have to try harder to ignore them.

[pickyourpoison]

I was told one time by a wise person that some people feed off of attention. The worse possible thing you can do to them is ignore them.
Let's just pray for them and let God handle it.