He's dead, Jim.
1 posted on
10/26/2003 10:33:59 AM PST by
Mark
To: Mark; AJFavish
Allan's a FReeper. Go Al Go!
2 posted on
10/26/2003 10:49:34 AM PST by
martin_fierro
(A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
To: Mark
We still wonder how he got that way. The photos are evidence that has been suppressed by legal mumbo-jumbo; and that naturally makes us wonder why they are being hidden. Allan Favish has fought long and well to get them released. I hope he wins!
3 posted on
10/26/2003 10:57:29 AM PST by
T'wit
To: Mark
Wish him well but doubt that this court will allow anything for public view. Mostly Republican appointees, too, I believe.
Odd how they all help each other and scorn the Constitution.
4 posted on
10/26/2003 11:02:00 AM PST by
Spirited
To: Mark
Killing my Fosters as we speak. After killed I send my kids outside to the woods to discard the evidence.......In the Fort Marcy Memorial glass bucket.
Nothing better than killing a whole six pack of Dead Hillary's Lover Brew on football Sunday's.
5 posted on
10/26/2003 11:24:49 AM PST by
blackdog
("This is everybody's fault but mine")
To: Alamo-Girl
DSL Ping
6 posted on
10/26/2003 11:25:43 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
To: Mark
Why wouldn't the original photographs have been destroyed on clintons orders?
8 posted on
10/26/2003 11:55:13 AM PST by
Ditter
To: Mark
In response, the solicitor general and Foster's sister and widow argue that releasing the graphic images would be a violation of the family's privacy and that the public has nothing to gain from viewing the photos. If it's not suicide, then it was murder and the public has every right to know. Ther's a killer loose and we have got to find him. How do we know it wasn't murder? I'm not convinced it was suicide. Show me all the photographs and then I'll decide.
To: Mark
CLINTONS DID IT
10 posted on
10/26/2003 12:39:50 PM PST by
y2k_free_radical
(ESSE QUAM VIDERA-to be rather than to seem)
To: Mark
bttt
11 posted on
10/26/2003 12:42:54 PM PST by
firewalk
To: Mark
"Erwin Chemerinsky, a University of Southern California constitutional-law professor. "How do we balance the desire to see these photographs with the desire of the family not to have them published?" Mr. Chemerinsky you are such a statist.
The balance is simple. If a family does not want photographs of their family member published, do not allow government to take the photos.
Once our government has possession of such photographs, all citizens have the unambigous right to few those photographs.
Amendment I
"Congress shall make no law...prohibiting...petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
It is only judicial dicta to the contrary.
14 posted on
10/26/2003 1:29:04 PM PST by
tahiti
To: Mark
Wanna bet when he finally gets the photos released they can't be found - just like all the 35mm photos of the crime scene and body which somehow turned up "missing" - not to mention the autopsy photos and x-rays which "didn't turn out"?
16 posted on
10/26/2003 2:19:24 PM PST by
Gritty
To: Mark
If Vince Foster would have had a gun in his hand,
he'd be alive today.
20 posted on
11/26/2003 9:15:18 AM PST by
Snardius
To: Mark
Sounds like this guy Favish needs to get a life. Or at least find something useful to do, like finding that dude on the grassy knoll.
24 posted on
01/12/2004 7:06:54 AM PST by
kegler4
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson