Skip to comments.
Battle Over Foster Photos Going to High Court(Vince Foster)
Los Angeles Daily News ^
| October 26, 2003
| Nicholas Grudin
Posted on 10/26/2003 10:33:58 AM PST by Mark
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
He's dead, Jim.
1
posted on
10/26/2003 10:33:59 AM PST
by
Mark
To: Mark; AJFavish
Allan's a FReeper. Go Al Go!
2
posted on
10/26/2003 10:49:34 AM PST
by
martin_fierro
(A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
To: Mark
We still wonder how he got that way. The photos are evidence that has been suppressed by legal mumbo-jumbo; and that naturally makes us wonder why they are being hidden. Allan Favish has fought long and well to get them released. I hope he wins!
3
posted on
10/26/2003 10:57:29 AM PST
by
T'wit
To: Mark
Wish him well but doubt that this court will allow anything for public view. Mostly Republican appointees, too, I believe.
Odd how they all help each other and scorn the Constitution.
4
posted on
10/26/2003 11:02:00 AM PST
by
Spirited
To: Mark
Killing my Fosters as we speak. After killed I send my kids outside to the woods to discard the evidence.......In the Fort Marcy Memorial glass bucket.
Nothing better than killing a whole six pack of Dead Hillary's Lover Brew on football Sunday's.
5
posted on
10/26/2003 11:24:49 AM PST
by
blackdog
("This is everybody's fault but mine")
To: Alamo-Girl
DSL Ping
6
posted on
10/26/2003 11:25:43 AM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
To: FreedomPoster
Sorry Vince.
7
posted on
10/26/2003 11:43:05 AM PST
by
Bon mots
To: Mark
Why wouldn't the original photographs have been destroyed on clintons orders?
8
posted on
10/26/2003 11:55:13 AM PST
by
Ditter
To: Mark
In response, the solicitor general and Foster's sister and widow argue that releasing the graphic images would be a violation of the family's privacy and that the public has nothing to gain from viewing the photos. If it's not suicide, then it was murder and the public has every right to know. Ther's a killer loose and we have got to find him. How do we know it wasn't murder? I'm not convinced it was suicide. Show me all the photographs and then I'll decide.
To: Mark
CLINTONS DID IT
10
posted on
10/26/2003 12:39:50 PM PST
by
y2k_free_radical
(ESSE QUAM VIDERA-to be rather than to seem)
To: Mark
bttt
11
posted on
10/26/2003 12:42:54 PM PST
by
firewalk
To: FreedomPoster
Thanks for the heads up!
To: y2k_free_radical
Foster was one tortured soul. Sorry his family-his wife remarried well, as I understand it. Must have been hard for her to suffer all the rumors of a romantic connectin between her heinous and her husband.
Wanting to know if Vince was killed, myself.
Altho I believe Ken Starr is honorable, I believe he is a person who would be willing to let certain things go untested for the betterment of his nation.
Vince Foster may have been killed in the WH. The activity after his death, within his office, INCLUDING ORDERS FROM HITLERY HERSELF, is very alarming.
13
posted on
10/26/2003 1:21:18 PM PST
by
Republic
To: Mark
"Erwin Chemerinsky, a University of Southern California constitutional-law professor. "How do we balance the desire to see these photographs with the desire of the family not to have them published?" Mr. Chemerinsky you are such a statist.
The balance is simple. If a family does not want photographs of their family member published, do not allow government to take the photos.
Once our government has possession of such photographs, all citizens have the unambigous right to few those photographs.
Amendment I
"Congress shall make no law...prohibiting...petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
It is only judicial dicta to the contrary.
14
posted on
10/26/2003 1:29:04 PM PST
by
tahiti
To: Bon mots
Hmmm... maybe this looks better???
Hard to do in Paint... no Photoshop on this notebook... no mouse either...
15
posted on
10/26/2003 2:02:01 PM PST
by
Bon mots
To: Mark
Wanna bet when he finally gets the photos released they can't be found - just like all the 35mm photos of the crime scene and body which somehow turned up "missing" - not to mention the autopsy photos and x-rays which "didn't turn out"?
16
posted on
10/26/2003 2:19:24 PM PST
by
Gritty
To: martin_fierro
I want to see these photo and those of Buddy as well.
17
posted on
10/26/2003 2:25:00 PM PST
by
Trueblackman
(The Viking Leo)
To: Gritty
Let's not forget that there are no tapes of Foster leaving the White House, supposedly for a hamburger lunch.
Let's not forget that the technician in charge of these tapes is on the same astral plane as Foster himself. I wonder if the technician has a widow.
18
posted on
11/03/2003 8:20:45 PM PST
by
Tymesup
To: Tymesup
"There is not a scintilla of evidence, either in the documents themselves or elsewhere in the record, that tends to impugn the integrity of the reports," the Solicitor General's Office wrote in a petition to the Supreme Court, referring to Favish's assertions that FBI interviews were inaccurate. There is not a "scintilla of (forensic) evidence" that Foster died where he was found. At the very least, his body was moved.
And he ate the hamburger lunch at his desk before he supposedly left the White House about 1:00PM. I don't know if there are tapes, but an Arkansas friend (a young lady who was at the White House that day) called a friend in Arkansas that afternoon hysterically saying Foster had killed himself in the White House parking lot.
19
posted on
11/26/2003 9:11:30 AM PST
by
Snardius
To: Mark
If Vince Foster would have had a gun in his hand,
he'd be alive today.
20
posted on
11/26/2003 9:15:18 AM PST
by
Snardius
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson