Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

In 1992 and 1996, Larry Nichols tried to warn America
about The Evil that is called "Clinton."

The Clinton's aren't just lucky politicians who manage
to win despite the odds.

The Clintons make the odds work in their favor
by manipulating reality.

It's time to think hard about the fact that what we
think is in our control, may not be.

What Hillary wants
Hillary gets.

And Hillary wants
the White House in 2004.

1 posted on 10/25/2003 6:49:09 PM PDT by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Joy Angela
But...she said she wouldn't run.

Would she lie???????

lol.
2 posted on 10/25/2003 6:55:46 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
Kinda scary, isn't it? Actually--it's damn scary!!!!
4 posted on 10/25/2003 7:01:13 PM PDT by basil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
I have been saying this since July... well before Clark declared...It's easy to figure out the clinton's

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To: newgeezer You are absolutely right Geezer.... Wesley Clark is running for Hillary.. He will offset the Dean "Far Left Juggernaut" that was on course for the nomination. The extreme left is lining up behind him.

Clark was put in position by the Clinton's to prevent Dean capturing enough votes... Clark was a "4 star General" after all and gives the nomination process a counter balance to Dean for the more moderate Democrats to latch on to... you know..the "SECURITY thing" the far left lacks...

This will prevent Dean specifically.... (the other dwarfs are nothing but also rans).... from winning the nomination.

Clark can't win it either... the core base of the party has an aversion to anything military.

That means an open convention... Hillary, who "stayed above the fray and avoided debate will be standing on the convention podium smiling as the brokered nominee...and Wesley...for his loyal primary activity will be Hillary's "National security card" on the ticket.

National Security is the D'RATS weakness... "General" Wesley will be her perfect choice for number 2.

This is all so obviously "Clintonesque"

The Clintons don't wait.. they just strong arm and stack the deck!

19 posted on 10/16/2003 8:46 AM PDT by Bob Eimiller (Kennedy... Leahy... Moran... Kucinich........ any more "Catholic" abortion proponents... ?)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

5 posted on 10/25/2003 7:01:27 PM PDT by Bob Eimiller (Kennedy... Leahy... Moran... Kucinich........ any more "Catholic" abortion proponents... ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
Larry maybe right but he is not the first to utter the idea that Hillary though not "running" is setting herself up to be drafted for that coveted spot.

Getting old Wesley to get front and center was not her first move making herself electable in the "defending" this nation vain. That actions was done after she became senator and got herself on the Armed Forces Committee, note how hard a time the Congress and "her" generals have given "Rummy".

No Hillary knows darn well how to pad her known weakness, defense, and it is when we don't hear from her, just listen to those around her like old Teddy screeching that "liar, liar" speech on the Senate floor. Now that is the kind of speech Hillary would give but knows darn well that coming from her mouth sends chills up ones spine.

So the question is did Teddy have to give her speeches in order to get the DNC convention in Boston next year?

6 posted on 10/25/2003 7:06:30 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
Her run could significantly increase the GOP control of Congress, at it happened with Bubba.
7 posted on 10/25/2003 7:10:36 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
Yous Guys are nutz. There is no way Hil is going to run in 2004! It would be political suicide for her. The Clinton's may be good, but there ain't nobody that good!

She has stated repeatedly she will not only NOT run, but finish her six year term as senator.

Ya crazy basstads, Oliveya's!

9 posted on 10/25/2003 7:12:35 PM PDT by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela

12 posted on 10/25/2003 7:28:12 PM PDT by ChadGore (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
politically, xxxillary is as clumsy as she stupid... raise a billion dollars and she'll still lose ... nothing short of a pre-revolutionary war economy will get her in the white house


13 posted on 10/25/2003 7:31:44 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch (Peter Gibbons: It's not that I'm lazy, it's that I just don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
I wish she would run so that we could get rid of her. Let her run. She doesn't imagine the voterts who will come out to vote against her.

Bring her on. Let's get rid of her in 2004!
23 posted on 10/25/2003 8:30:37 PM PDT by katz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
Larry predicted that Bill Clinton would not leave office after the 2000 election.

I don't believe he's all that good at forseeing the future.
28 posted on 10/25/2003 9:14:14 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
the beast will never be President
29 posted on 10/25/2003 9:18:13 PM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
Clarke has 6%, is that leading the polls these days?
31 posted on 10/25/2003 9:21:13 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
I took the position a month ago that Hillary will be Clark's VP. This will put her in perfect position for '08. I believe that, realistically, she would rather have (she believes) a guaranteed victory over a newcomer than risk the slightest chance of losing to Bush.

As VP, she will gain all the exposure of a national candidate, but with no real downside. If the ticket loses, it will not be Hillary who lost - - it will be Clark. This protects her viability, and she is now an official contender for '08.

On the other hand, if Clark was to pull an incredible upset, well, he would certainly understand who was responsible for his election and he would certainly (for reasons to be determined/manufactured) step aside after one term to make way for Hillary in '08. Provided, that is, something unfortunate didn't befall him before then.

Bookmark it - - "Clark/Clinton '04".
33 posted on 10/25/2003 9:26:42 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
Joy, I love Larry Nichols more than hot dogs. I was a faithful listener when he made those mysterious gravel-voice call-ins to George Putnam, from somewhere in a secure cave in the Ozarks. However, Larry just ain't wrapped too tight. He's like a stopped clock, right twice a day. Which in the Clinton business ain't too bad. However, some of Larry's predictions have been Hillariously wrong and cost a lot of his supporters ...like me ...much face. As a prognosticator of impending events, I rank him right up there with the Larry Klaman guy and his 750 going-nowhere lawsuits.

Unfortunately for everybody, this is one of those times when Larry may well be on the money, but then even a blind hog, etc. etc. etc..

35 posted on 10/25/2003 10:16:31 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
Her negatives are just too high for her to win a national race.

You can always find lunatics and Bush haters willing to vote for her, but there's not enough of them to get her into the WH.

THANK GOD!
39 posted on 10/25/2003 11:49:03 PM PDT by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
Her negatives are just too high for her to win a national race.

You can always find lunatics and Bush haters willing to vote for her, but there's not enough of them to get her into the WH. THANK GOD!
40 posted on 10/25/2003 11:49:04 PM PDT by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
Agree with all of the above.
42 posted on 10/25/2003 11:52:25 PM PDT by ladyinred (Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson