1 posted on
10/25/2003 3:30:04 PM PDT by
demlosers
To: demlosers
Humm watched the show last night ad was disappointed. Seemed very hard to get the UFO theory to hold up. I grew up in Maryland, not far from the crash site and most folks thought it was a camera module off of a U2. Could also have been part of the grandpa of the SR-71 in that time frame. Makes me suspicious that NASA has agreed so fast - nothing to hide would be my take on it.
To: demlosers
It should be interesting to see if there's any incrementally better info released in the docs or not.
I wouldn't expect a lot of shocking stuff. Maybe some slightly better details.
There's some Kecksburg docs in this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1004960/posts?page=446 Toward the latter half of the 2nd section.
3 posted on
10/25/2003 5:43:27 PM PDT by
Quix
(DEFEAT the lying, deceptive, satanic, commie, leftist, globalist oligarchy 1 associate at a time)
To: demlosers
"I think it's fair to say that we have truly entered the realm of science fiction in Washington, D.C., when it's fair game to disclose the identity of a clandestine CIA agent, but not the records of an unexplained crash in Kecksburg, Pa., that occurred 38 years ago," Podesta said at a news conference this week.
HEhe. What a loser.
5 posted on
10/25/2003 6:05:54 PM PDT by
tet68
(multiculturalism is an ideological academic fantasy maintained in obvious bad faith. M. Thompson)
To: demlosers
NASA informed Lee Helfrich, attorney for the Channel-sponsored Coalition for Freedom of Information, that it is releasing 36 pages of documents I would bet it take NASA 36 pages to document a routine half-hour meeting. Where are the rest of the documents?
6 posted on
10/25/2003 6:16:33 PM PDT by
RJL
To: demlosers
screw NASA's files...I want to see the NSA files.
12 posted on
10/25/2003 10:46:31 PM PDT by
Keith
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson