Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frank Rich: The right rides the Rat Pack revival
Int. Herald Tribune ^ | 10-18-03 | Frank Rich

Posted on 10/17/2003 5:52:54 PM PDT by ambrose

 

Copyright © 2003 The International Herald Tribune | www.iht.com

Frank Rich: The right rides the Rat Pack revival
Frank Rich NYT
Saturday, October 18, 2003

 

NEW YORK Rush Limbaugh trades cigar boxes stuffed with cash for his fixes of "baby blues" in Palm Beach. Bill Bennett bets everything but the milk money on the slots in sex-drenched Vegas. A Kennedy-by-marriage movie-star-turned-governor freely admits to a "rowdy" past of soundstage gropings in Hollywood.

Ring-a-ding-ding! The Rat Pack is back! This is good news for the right, if not necessarily the United States. Pop culture has long been a lose-lose proposition for the moralistic, post-Ronald Reagan conservative movement. In the 1990's, Limbaugh, Bennett and company fell into the habit of portraying the '60s, epitomized by that draft-dodging, pot-smoking, skirt-chasing hippie Bill Clinton, as the fount of all evil. And yet those '60s are also the template for much of the music, mores and social change that now define mainstream American life.

What to do? If you demonize the '60s outright, voters think you are a scolding old biddy; the hippest stars likely to leap onto your bandwagon are Bo Derek and what's-his-name who used to play TV's "Major Dad." Meanwhile, the Dixie Chicks and Bruce Springsteen become fellow travelers of the opposition.

But this year the right seems to have finally found its place in the klieg lights. It has not only chosen to countenance (and then some) pill-popping, gambling, boorish womanizing, seamy show-biz glitz and the Kennedy mythos - it has done so at the exact moment that the Rat Pack spirit is resurgent in the culture as a whole. While the Rat Pack belonged to the '60s, too, it belonged to the early, pre-Beatles, pre-Vietnam '60s - the conservative '60s. It's just the kind of hedonism that fits this moment - "swanky nightspots, sharp outfits, neat haircuts, stiff drinks and cigarette packs free of Surgeon General's Warnings," in the summation of Shawn Levy's nostalgic history, "Rat Pack Confidential."

Should Iraq become the new Vietnam, then it will be time to dust off those Jefferson Airplane LP's. For now, The Rat Pack '60s are king. Vegas has far surpassed its one-time rivals, Chicago and Atlanta, as the nation's No. 1 spot for conventions. Gambling, whether in Nevada, in 47 other states or on the Internet, has become a bigger American growth industry than McDonald's. One survey shows that even a large number of high school students, some 30 percent in all, have adopted Bennett's high-rolling habits; surely no former secretary of education has ever been so successful a role model to impressionable youth.

On the right-wing editorial page of The Wall Street Journal, the celebration of the Rat Pack revival's cultural values began on the Schwarzenegger victory night. "He's cool," wrote the paper's deputy editorial page editor, Daniel Henninger, in his mash note to Arnold. "It looks as if the first party to get totally wired-in to a mega-celebrity is, incredibly, the GOP. Something weirdly attractive was coming off the Schwarzenegger camp's victory stage on TV 'round about midnight Tuesday."

To make his case, he swooned over Maria Shriver, Jay Leno's "funny introduction," Rob Lowe, Eunice and Sargent Shriver and "a sea of young, attractive faces." Somehow, Henninger missed Gary Busey, but never mind. "Liberal pundits will mock this scene unmercifully," his essay concluded, "but in terms of mass-market politics it was as hip as any politician could ever hope for." Mock this erotic fantasy? Coming from the same editorial page that devoted years to tut-tutting about the whereabouts of Clinton's penis?

Not me. The scene on that stage, as Henninger writes, is just too hip, too totally, incredibly wired. If Arnold strikes some Rat Pack purists as a faint echo of Peter Lawford's immigrant origins, dubious father and Kennedy connection, his movie career and sexual exploits both literally and figuratively outstrip those of his predecessor. Nor can anyone doubt that Leno, the official Schwarzenegger toastmaster, is a late-night wit on an uncanny par with his antecedent, Joey Bishop.

If only Limbaugh had found a way to join the election night tableau, it would have been complete: As we know from his brief but memorable run as a commentator on ESPN's "Sunday NFL Countdown," he can be more out of it than Sammy Davis, the candy man himself.

For Republicans with long memories, the party's new affection for Rat Pack naughtiness must feel like coming home. Though Sinatra and his pals were known for their liberal Democratic politics in the early '60s, they moved to the right once the '60s rock culture shoved them to the show business sidelines.

By 1972, Sammy Davis was hugging Richard Nixon at the Republican convention in Miami Beach; two years earlier, Sinatra had stumped for Reagan's re-election in California. It was also then, Wil Haygood reports in his sparkling new Davis biography, "In Black and White," that the party's "unofficial envoys to Hollywood were Donald Rumsfeld, an aide to Nixon, and his wife, Joyce." In Haygood's account, we learn that the Rumsfelds hung out with Sammy at the pool in Vegas and even obtained an audience with an apparently pill-popping Elvis. To this day, we can see the Sinatra influence in the secretary of defense's hair-trigger temper, though he has a way to go to emulate Sammy's sartorial flair.

That the Rat Pack is part of the right's DNA only makes ideological sense. Conservatives are supposed to oppose big government's heavy-handed regulation of sex, drugs, gambling, taxes and smoking. If a guy wants to benefit from sweetheart deals with the mob - or Enron executives - it's a free country, isn't it? Somehow conservatism in the 1990's wandered from the Goldwater model, choosing instead to pry into bedrooms, campaign against Hollywood and preach like Billy Sunday. By at long last re-embracing its inner Dino, the right is returning to its ideological roots.

But for Republicans to capitalize fully on their born-again hipness, more conservative leaders will have to follow The Wall Street Journal's example and get with the program. Too many of them are sounding like liberal wusses, trying too hard to "explain" and "understand" and "rationalize" Arnold and Rush's bad behavior.

Some have tried to airbrush Schwarzenegger's well-documented history of sexcapades, hoping to attribute his antics not to the man himself but to the Los Angeles Times, which provided the unexpurgated account. This is as silly as liberals' putting the blame for Monicagate on the Starr report, and politically self-defeating besides. The voters, including women, have spoken: They didn't want the groper's march on Sacramento to be impeded by his sex life. Arnold's private behavior is no longer merely Clintonesque - it has been elevated to Kennedyesque and Sinatraesque. As The Wall Street Journal says, he's cool.

But not every Rat Pack aficionado is yet convinced that the new Rat Pack lives up to the original. One dissenter is the writer Kitty Kelley, the author of "His Way," the unauthorized biography of Sinatra, who is now completing an unauthorized biography of the Bush dynasty. "Even at their worst the Rat Pack was entertaining and usually spoofed themselves, their babes and their benders," she says, whereas the new one "skulks around in parking lots buying drugs from their maids and creeping into casinos. No pleasures there, just shameful pathologies which they deny until the handcuffs are clicked."

But in Kelley's view the biggest shortfall is the absence of a central figure like Sinatra "who was so feared that a mere snap of his fingers would make grown men, fueled by Jack Daniel's, toss a piano off the penthouse balcony of the Fontainebleau Hotel." The only candidate she can see for Top Rat is George Bush. As she points out, Barbara Bush already fits "the mother/$ mascot role of Dolly Sinatra - big, brawling babes who go to the mat for their errant sons." Should the president, Governor Schwarzenegger and their gang get Peggy Noonan to glitz up her look, they can do their own remake of "Robin and the 7 Hoods" before Steven Soderbergh beats them to it.

Happily, Bush is already showing signs of rising to his appointed role. As soon as the news broke of Limbaugh's pill-popping two weeks ago, he saluted the broadcaster as a "great American." R.I.P., "Just Say No."

The New York Times



Copyright © 2003 The International Herald Tribune

 



TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: ratpack

1 posted on 10/17/2003 5:52:54 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Typical Rich drivel!
2 posted on 10/17/2003 5:54:16 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Let them revel in their delusions while fewer and fewer people are buying what they are selling. Let them laugh all the way to obscurity. WE will have the LAST laugh. Har!
3 posted on 10/17/2003 5:59:06 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Well, I think what he says about Arnold is correct. But he's popping his own blues on Limbaugh and Bennett. Bennett did nothing illegal. Limbaugh appears to have done plenty illegal. Neither rate the obscenities of Clinton or the "Rat Pack."
4 posted on 10/17/2003 6:07:17 PM PDT by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Whatever, man. I'd rather live in Sinatra's world than Frank Rich's or Maureen Dowd's. Better a full blown heart attack from too much richly marbled steak and Jack Daniels than a long life of macrobiotic brown rice and tofu.
5 posted on 10/17/2003 6:28:29 PM PDT by Argus ((Ninety-nine and forty-four one-hundredths percent Pure Reactionary))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Frank Rich, AKA the NYTimes's attack poodle.
6 posted on 10/17/2003 6:33:29 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Schwarzenegger is on the right?
7 posted on 10/17/2003 7:39:00 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
HAHAHAH! Suddenly the Left is moral! People whose scruples were for sale at Wal-Mart are now masquerading as guardians of the social order! Gotta love living in interesting times.
8 posted on 10/17/2003 8:27:43 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: ambrose
Leave it to this guy to damage his credibility by citing "Rat Pack Confidential." That book royally stinks, and every Rat Pack student knows it.

In other words, "Bingo, Dingo."
11 posted on 10/17/2003 9:07:08 PM PDT by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson