Skip to comments.
Dean: Big deficit suits GOP's plans
USA Today ^
| deep
Posted on 10/17/2003 6:07:13 AM PDT by deep
By Susan Page and Jill Lawrence, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON ? Democratic presidential contender Howard Dean accused Republicans on Thursday of running up the federal budget deficit so they can undermine the fiscal underpinnings of Medicare and Social Security.
"I think their principal motivation is to undo the pillars of the New Deal, particularly Medicare and Social Security, by making the budget deficit so big that those programs can't be sustained," he said at a lunch with USA TODAY and the Gannett News Service.
(Excerpt) Read more at usatoday.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hoawarddean
1
posted on
10/17/2003 6:07:13 AM PDT
by
deep
To: deep
Here we go with the social security scare tactics again.
2
posted on
10/17/2003 6:08:12 AM PDT
by
deep
To: deep
Most conservatives wish the GOP's end game was the end of Social Security and Medicaid.
Dare to dream.
3
posted on
10/17/2003 6:09:28 AM PDT
by
JohnGalt
(Attention Pseudocons: Wilsonianrepublic.com is still available)
To: deep
Wow, I thought Medicare and Social Security were labeled "off budget", so that noone would know how much they cost.
Dean is not insufferably right, he's just insufferably smug.
One of these days millions of people are going to line up for their medicare and social security benefits only to be told there really is no money left for these programs. Then let's see how well insufferable, rich white @$$-holes like Howard Dean do when the blood runs in the street.
4
posted on
10/17/2003 6:14:21 AM PDT
by
.cnI redruM
(The September 11th attacks were clearly Clinton's most consequential legacy. - Rich Lowry)
To: deep
5
posted on
10/17/2003 6:15:15 AM PDT
by
OXENinFLA
To: JohnGalt
correct me if I'm wrong but with S.S. and Medicare being entitlement programs, aren't they guranteed to be funded regardless of the budget situation? While I wish Dean were correct in that the programs could be driven to bankruptcy, and therefore privitized, I thought that hell would freeze over before those programs would ever run short of funds.
6
posted on
10/17/2003 6:18:59 AM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: deep
Dean and Kennedy! There's a pair. Both spouting the same bushwa about the world coming apart because they aren't in charge.
Hey, fellas....I'd like to see things from your point of view but I can't get my head that far up my a**!
7
posted on
10/17/2003 6:22:30 AM PDT
by
JimVT
To: OXENinFLA
8
posted on
10/17/2003 6:23:02 AM PDT
by
deep
To: deep
Yes Deane, we must raise taxes. Go for it.
9
posted on
10/17/2003 6:23:29 AM PDT
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: deep
Well, with the supply-side tax cuts starting to work their magic, the deficit might not be much longer. And people are sitting on nice gains in the stock market this year, much more than the loss carryforwards of previous years. (I'm one of them). So stock market capital gains revenues should be increasing too.
What's Dean going to say then? I think he just stuck his foot in his mouth.
To: deep
I wish this was the GOP's plan. Not so, however. They're trying to triangulate--lower taxes to try to keep their conservative base intact, and increase spending hoping to pick up a few moderates/liberals. But they can't outspend the RATs and they're only antagonizing conservatives with the deficit spending.
11
posted on
10/17/2003 6:34:57 AM PDT
by
reelfoot
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson