LA billionaire backing Wesley Clark [Clinton goons Nathan Landow and Eli Broad]

Arkansas Democrat-Gazette ^ | October 16, 2003 | PAUL BARTON

[JOE6PAK]

But what is this guy Clark all about?

[RippleFire]

bump

[thegreatbeast]

Bill Gates couldn't buy Clark the White House, not to worry.

[Howlin]

NATHAN LANDOW????

Nathan Landow????


THEY"RE BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Shermy]

George Soros connections...checking...He and Eli Broad got together to make multi-hundred million dollar bids on various sports teams including the Los Angeles Dodgers.

Sound chummy to me...

[Cold Heat]

But what is this guy Clark all about?

He is a wiener! A back stabbing no good wiener!

[upchuck]

While Clark’s total will lag far behind those of former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean or Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, Clark backers say he already is showing a fund-raising prowess that will make him a major factor in the fight for the Democratic nomination.

Hell... if I had the backing of x42rapist/perjurer and The Hildabeaste and the DNC, via McAwful, I could raise lots of cash, too.

Clark is a pathetic joke and a puppet for those previously mentioned.

[Howlin]

So, what position with the Clark campaign did Betsy Wright get?

[upchuck]

"He will be a new Democrat, a centrist."

Didn't we just finish trying this for eight miserable years?

[L.N. Smithee]

But what is this guy Clark all about?

He's all about a being a candidate who can win.

Sound familiar?

[L.N. Smithee]

George Soros connections...checking...He and Eli Broad got together to make multi-hundred million dollar bids on various sports teams including the Los Angeles Dodgers.

Hoooooly cow...as a Giant fan, I have always "hated" the Dodgers. If Soros had purchased them, the quotation marks would have come off the above sentence.

[longshadow]

NATHAN LANDOW????

Gee, would that be the same Nate Landow who was involved with the infamous "Portals" building scandal, as well as the guy who tried to strong arm some Indian tribes?

[Southack]

"But what is this guy Clark all about?"

Sheesh, where to start?!

Clark was a perfumed prince in the military who uniformly annoyed, angered, and was opposed by everyone in the ranks below, at, and above his pay grade level...save those few who like Rhodes Scholars, megalomaniacs, and politically-connected machiavellan ministers.

In his zest to lead NATO headfirst into war against Serbia over Kosovo 4 years ago, Clark fully ignored the UN, refused to consider UN inspectors to verify the claims of "mass graves" and "genocide," as well as bombed civilian TV stations/studios while they were on the air (and he also bombed civilian bridges while human shields were visibly present on them). But besides ordering attacks on civilian targets, Clark also insured that foreign diplomatic targets, such as the Chinese Embassy, were also hit. If it could make America look bad, Clark pretty well ordered it.

"I'll not start the Third World War for you," said British General Mike Jackson as he DISOBEYED Clark's direct order to open fire on Russian paratroopers who had just landed at the Pristina airport in Serbia in 1999.

Clark was then fired from NATO as well as fired from the U.S. military. He returned to Arkansas where he received jobs from friends of Bill Clinton. Staffers on Clark's campaign almost all have experience campaigning and fund-raising for former President Clinton, and this is why people like Eli Broad can say that they just "know" that the Clinton's favor Clark even though there has been no announcement by the Clinton's regarding who they favor/endorse.

Which means that Hillary is still considering Clark, among others, to be the annointed one to select her as the Democratic Party VP candidate in 2004...

[Mo1]

Eli Broad, a Los Angeles philanthropist and one of the nation’s wealthiest individuals, said Tuesday he is putting his money on retired Gen. Wesley Clark of Little Rock to take the White House away from George W. Bush.

Am I correct in my thinking that if Hellary teams up with Clark they can combine the funds they raise??

If so .. Clark is nothing but a front man for Hellary

[Criminal Number 18F]

"Out of all the Democratic candidates, he is the most qualified to take on the issues of terrorism, foreign policy and domestic security."

On the face of it, that is a true statement -- which just proves how far out of the mainstream Democratic thinking is on those issues:

• Terrorism: "we didn't build day-care centers like Osama does -- he's better than America -- that's why he deserves to win, and we dance when American soldiers die."
• Foreign Policy: "Hell no, we won't go! Ho, Ho, Ho Chi Minh! I regret I have but one country to give for my life!"
• Domestic Security: "We need to open the gates for more undocumented workers from the Mideast, and open our minds to their Islamist truth, which is after all more authentically true than our Dead White Truth."

Clark is embracing these policies, trying to chisel Dean out of his position on the Marxian left. Alas, despite this article calling him the "frontrunner," the polls tell a different tale. Every sentient being on the planet, which includes a handful of Democrats, knows that he is just a placeholder for Cruella Da Hil.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

[Lancey Howard]

[wardaddy]

It's a Jewish conspiracy I tell ya...

[wardaddy]

yep and if she can't run as VP, the last thing she wants is a Dem to win in 04.

[BJungNan]

It does not matter what he stands for/stood for/again stands for/what he said/says/or will say up until the point the majority of the voters start to pay attention to the election process.

He will emerge exactly as the money behind him wants him to appear and be perceived. ABCBSNBCNNLOSANGESLIMESNEWYORKMAKEBELIVETIMES will go right along with it.