Posted on 08/28/2020 11:21:48 AM PDT by Zenyatta
The New York Times this week published a lengthy sympathetic story about three men the paper suggested were guilty of the victimless crime of trying to have sex with underage girls.
One of the men was Jace Hambrick, who the Times describes as a nerdy gamer who “wasn’t someone who could meet women at a bar.”
So he gave Craigslist a try.
There, he met girl who said she was 13, although the Times defends Hambrick by saying he thought she was older than she claimed.
“Jus gamer gurl sittin’ home on sunny day,” the girl’s ad read. “we can chat as long as im not lvling!”
After exchanging several emails and messages, they started talking about sex, and at one point Hambrick wrote, “I can be real bad if your into bondage.”
(Excerpt) Read more at lacortenews.com ...
They really think this is OK? Boy, are they in for a surprise.
Millstones are heavy. They sink fast.
There is no “bottom” for the Spawn of Satan (AKA new york slimes).
Why do I feel like pizza tonight?
Craig’s List??? Not recently.
I actually read that piece in its entirety and came away with two distinct conclusions. Most of the cases were fairly run of the mill in the basic facts and were almost certainly guilty. But I was also left bothered by the fact that in most cases the cops never produced a shred of evidence that the suspects had gone online looking for sex with minors. In far too many cases it was pretty clear to me that no crime would have occurred if the state had not manufactured the conditions obviously intended to entice people into doing something that in most cases, the suspects would not have done on their own. Most of the suspects had no history of sexual predation or any evidence like online activity that would suggest inclinations towards that behavior. While I agree that almost all of them were ultimately guilty of breaking the law, the conduct of the government here looks and smells like entrapment.
Thought crimes
Anchovies?
We knew it would come to this. The slide down the slippery slope began a long time ago.
Entrapment is a great career builder for cops and feds, but it mostly snares introverted or inept or mentally ill people, not likely to take action on their own.
Goes for terrorism stings as well as sex atings.
This is no slide, the kids were the ultimate target of the LGBQ whatever the hell they are bunch to begin with. They will at first tell us it is normal and then it’s good for the kids to be raped, they will then begin to lower the age of consent further and further downward.
They can do all these things but if one of these animals gets one of my grand kids they are going to disappear and never be seen or heard from again, but I can assure them, their death will not be over quickly and they will not enjoy any part of it...
“their death will not be over quickly and they will not enjoy any part of it..”
When I started to hear about NAMBLA a couple decades ago, besides having it make me physically ill, I could see the handwriting on the wall as to where pedophilia was headed.
My headline: New York Times advises predators to abuse underage girls they already have access to rather than ones met online
Facebook is censoring this story. The Left’s attack on morality never stops but they do not like the light of day on what they are doing.
And many though the years have said on this board that perversion does not matter in terms of a person on our side in office. It does. If they actually identify as from this group, yes. This is the goal is sex with children. A natural progression. Romans 1 applies to anyone that says this does not matter. “God gave them up”
Facebook is blocking this from being posted.
It’s not a slippery slope when it was part of the program all along.
Here is something else to consider. I just spoke with a woman who told me she was not allowed to access her 13 year old daughter’s medical records because, and I quote “She may be sexually active and she has the right to privacy in that regard.” Does anyone see a contradiction here? By law a 13 year old is not able to consent to sex. Which means this “right to privacy” is concealing a crime but hey that’s o.k.
This is the same newspaper that has done articles on that horrible Jeffrey Epstein. Talk about hypocrisy!
This is the problem with having a cabal run by leets that rely on NPCs (Non Player Characters. A gaming term for computer controlled in-game entities that player driven characters interact with as part of the game) that are script driven.
The scripts were loaded over decades of time. “She” was supposed to win. The timers were all set based upon her winning.
Now, the timer is still running, the scripts are being read out by the NPCs, but there’s a whole different boss and admin in power than what the leets (elites) supposed would be.
Now, just imagine where we’d be if Trump didn’t run the Great Interruption and *all* the scripts got run on time and on target.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.