Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: Zenyatta

“Flipped” is horseclinton.

More judges on the 9th have been appointed by Trump than any other President, but we are still in the great minority, 19 to 10, with BJ Clinton, the father of the Coward Bush brothers and the Fraud against us.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit


8 posted on 02/24/2020 11:54:06 AM PST by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: treetopsandroofs

You need to try that again. The court composition is 16D appointed 13 R appointed. As per your reference which is correct.


25 posted on 02/24/2020 12:43:34 PM PST by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance. Nemo me impune lacessit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: treetopsandroofs

Bush Appointed 9th Circuit:
1.Callahan’s other noteworthy opinions include:
In Ileto v. Glock, 370 F.3d 860 (9th Cir. 2004), a mentally disturbed man, prohibited by law from owning a gun, opened fire on a Los Angeles-area Jewish Community Center wounding several children and killing postal worker Joseph Ileto. Callahan penned a dissent sharply criticizing the majority decision that allowed a suit filed by victims against the gun manufacturer to go forward. She wrote, “(t)he potential impact of the panel’s decision is staggering ... the practical costs of forcing manufacturers to defend to juries all non-meritorious claims, as well as arguably meritorious claims, for all injuries that occurred in California cannot help but have a substantial impact on California’s economy.”


28 posted on 02/24/2020 1:12:02 PM PST by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance. Nemo me impune lacessit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: treetopsandroofs

Bush Appointed
2.Hon. Sandra Segal Ikuta U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Contributor at tht Federalist Society
On July 12, 2019, in City of Los Angeles V. Barr, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned a nationwide injunction issued in 2018, thus upholding preferential treatment in awarding community policing grants to cities that cooperate with immigration authorities. In the opinion, Judge Ikuta wrote, “Cooperation relating to enforcement of federal immigration law is in pursuit of the general welfare, and meets the low bar of being germane to the federal interest in providing the funding to “address crime and disorder problems, and otherwise... enhance public safety... one of the main purposes for which” the grant is intended.
* In other federal judicial news, the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, held that courts cannot routinely shackle defendants during proceedings; Judge Alex Kozinski wrote the majority opinion, and former Kozinski clerk Judge Sandra Ikuta wrote the dissent.


33 posted on 02/24/2020 1:16:49 PM PST by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance. Nemo me impune lacessit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: treetopsandroofs

Bush Appointed 9th Circuit
3.Milan Smith Contributor Federalist Society
In July 2007, in Lands Council v. McNair, Smith wrote a concurrence described as “unusually blunt and wide-ranging”, in which he criticized the court for “taking the law too far and causing much of ‘the decimation of the logging industry in the Pacific Northwest’ and the loss of legions of timber jobs.”[6] Smith’s view prevailed when the case was reviewed en banc. He wrote the opinion for the unanimous eleven-judge panel in July 2008.

United States Forest Service, 681 F. 3d 1006 (9th Cir. 2012), Smith dissented from an en banc decision of the court holding that a federal agency’s decision to refrain from acting triggered the Endangered Species Act’s interagency consultation process.
Medi-Cal case: California’s attempt to cut doctors’ fees illegal (2009)

See also: United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., et al., v. David Maxwell-Jolly, Director of the Dept. of Health Care Services, State of California, 2:08-cv-03315-CAS-MAS)

Judge Smith wrote the majority opinion in a lawsuit involving the withholding of retroactive reimbursement payments to providers of Medi-Cal. Medi-Cal is California’s Medicaid program.[4] Judge Smith, along with judges Stephen Reinhardt and William Fletcher, ruled unanimously to uphold an injunction against cuts in the reimbursement payments to providers. The panel ruled that California’s budget crisis did not justify the 10% reduction in payments to providers.[4]


34 posted on 02/24/2020 1:22:29 PM PST by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance. Nemo me impune lacessit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson