Tulsi Gabbard Breaks With Democrats During Debate, Brands Trump Impeachment ‘Divisive’

The Federalist ^ | October 15, 2019 | Tristan Justice

[mass55th]

She was co-chair of the DNC, and quit to support Bernie Sanders in 2016. She might be pretty, but she's nothing but a socialist. What she said in 2016: "I think it’s most important for us,” she continued, “to recognize the necessity to have a commander-in-chief who has foresight, exercises good judgment, who looks beyond the consequences, looks at the consequences of the actions they’re looking to take, before they take those actions, so we don’t continue to find ourselves in these failures that have resulted in chaos in the Middle East and so much loss of life."

With that quote, she should be supporting President Trump.

[HighSierra5]

She’s playing the conservatives. Don’t be fooled. Plus she’s got a crater face.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Not a chance of that here.

I am kind of surprised how many are fooled by Flamesey Grahamnesty’s McCain two-step.

He STILL wants to pass amnesty and give the Democrats a permanent majority.

[mbrfl]

“Isn’t our President the one bragging that the Saudis have agreed to pay a lot of money for the US to help with their defense, and in the next breath saying he was sending thousands of US troops there?”

So that makes POTUS our pimp? If Gabbard has criticisms about POTUS’s policies on a given issue, she needs to articulate them better. Referring to POTUS as our pimp is divisive rhetoric, not a rational, constructive arguement.

“Our troops are not supposed to be mercenaries whose services are leased to the highest bidder.”

Nice straw man you constructed there. The “leasing our services to the highest bidder” is your inaccurate characterization of the situation - nothing more. Our military cooperation with any nation needs to be judged on an individual basis. Should Trump NOT charge the Saudi’s for our services just to prove to people like you that money was not the criteria for assisting the Saudi’s? Charging our allies for costs incurred should be standard practice. If Trump were all about using our forces as a source of revenue, we would be staying in Afghanistan so that we could charge the Afghani’s for the use of our military. Instead, he’s in the process of bringing them home.

[Freedom56v2]

And here it is...

[daler]

I was a young lad in 1960.

But I still recall my dad, a staunch Nixon Republican, being infuriated with my mom, who supported Kennedy because he was “so handsome.”

[Freedom56v2]

Same reason women supported Clinton.

Wonder how reaction around here and on Drudge poll would differ if she looked like...

HELEN THOMAS...

And I am not so mean as to post her picture here ;)

[Truthoverpower]

She’s awesome.

A real veteran.

She destroyed kameltoes campaign

Love Hawaii

Love her.

[cgbg]

She smiles while she sticks a Shiv in your back.

[vpintheak]

I continue to be shocked at the level of idiocy of some people on FR. Yeah, she’s decent looking. Yeah, she’s a leftard. Never to be trusted. Ever.

[grania]

They all thing President Trump is guilty. Tulsi wants a legal, methodical process. I’m okay with that. President Trump is not guilty. If the process is done fairly, it will expose the swamp and prove that President Trump is the victim of Deep State operatives who have no intention of giving up their grip on power.

[trebb]

@SpeakerPelosi
Hmmmm - the one candidate who called your “impeachment” crapola “divisive” is the one who overwhelmingly won last night’s debate....there’s your sign....
looks like the “Captain” is punching holes in her own boat...

Had to tweet Pelousy in case she hadn’t noticed....

[vikingrinn]

‘everything that glitters’...

now, if only she weren’t for single payer healthcare, abolishment of capital punishment, banning ‘assault weapons’, raising the income tax, the ‘dream’ act, no id requirement voting, taxpayer funded campaigns, no work requirement for welfare recipients, d.c. statehood, etc., etc., etc. - oh, and eliminating the electoral college...

[VTenigma]

She’s the only sane Democrat

---

One of these things is not like the other.

[VTenigma]

Ditto, to all of it.

[Maris Crane]

Sorry, grania, I’m NOT okay with that.

[Maris Crane]

Thanks for that succinct presentation of her platform.

This woman is dangerous.

She says ONE sane thing and she’s acceptable as a candidate.
As Frasier once said...”I went to bed with the prom queen and woke up with Carrie.”

This broad is Carrie.

[CondoleezzaProtege]

She changes her positions so often, it’s hard to keep track. The moderate routine of hers is nothing more than an act - a way to differentiate herself from the rest. Don’t trust her.

Or Andrew Yang. It’s as though they are appealing to people who know Trump is right but are too snowflakey to admit it. Or Ron Paulists too chicken to vote Republican. Or millennials who want capitalistic economic perks, but are wishy washy on social issues like abortion.

And I don’t appreciate Tulsi’s doublespeak. One minute attacking the impeachment inquiry, the next suggesting Trump is akin to a war criminal with “blood on his hands” for policy towards Kurds. I thought Tulsi WANTS us to stop these endless regime change wars?!

*eyeroll*

[CondoleezzaProtege]

I don’t appreciate Tulsi’s doublespeak. One minute attacking the divisiveness of the impeachment inquiry, the next suggesting Trump is akin to a war criminal with “blood on his hands” for policy towards Kurds and Syria. I thought Tulsi WANTS us to stop these endless regime change wars?!

And very flakey on social issues. Do we want someone echoing Hillary’s mantra: “abortion should be safe, legal, and rare” appointing the next SCOTUS justice! The stakes are wayyyyy too high!

[SunkenCiv]

/bingo

She’s a Trojan Horse, or rather, she would be if her candidacy were viable at all. The only reason she’s been allowed back in is to serve as both an alibi (for “inclusiveness”) and as an example of when animals attack. Thanks CP.