To: RayofHope
Just sew! But we still need him in the Senate. The Democrat is sure as hell not a better choice. Cruz has done good work in the Senate and high profile his opposition to the Establishment arguably paved the way for the Trump candidacy. He proved he is not presidential material but he is certainly Senatorial material. Trump should enthusiastically endorse him now, even after Cruz snubbed Trump. Ryan is different. I would rather see a Democrat in that seat than Ryan. Ryan, after all, proved he is a contender for Democrats' MVP. A Democrat in Ryan's place would likely do less damage than Ryan can and will do.
50 posted on
08/14/2016 11:35:30 AM PDT by
arthurus
To: arthurus
" But we still need him in the Senate. "
The hell we do!
ANY Democrat would be better than a traitor.
51 posted on
08/14/2016 11:39:38 AM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: arthurus
We do NOT need him in the Senate. He is NOT a Conservative. He voted AGAINST AMERICAN SOVEREIGNTY, when he bothered to even vote. Although the list is ling,That alone is enough for me.
58 posted on
08/14/2016 12:12:56 PM PDT by
Mollypitcher1
(I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
To: arthurus
Good post. The difference between replacing Cruz and Ryan is that Ryan’s opponent is a conservative. Whoever the Bush family puts up against Cruz in the primary will be a Bush family globalist.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson