[2ndDivisionVet]

How convenient.

[digger48]

I just posted exactly the opposite of this on the “replacement” thread.

If we don’t get a pitbull conservative as Speaker to encourage the true base to get out there and vote, there’s a good chance we’ll see Speaker Pelosi again come 2017.

[Jim W N]

So what else is new? This is standard GOPe advice.

[fhayek]

Then, given the politics of WaPo, wouldn't this be exactly what they want? Why do they always champion milquetoast RINOs for the GOP nomination? Individuals that they NEVER support during the general election. Why don't they support conservatives to win the Republican nomination, if they think it will hurt the party so much?

[liberalism is suicide]

Surrender your principles. Win an election. Big deal! You have lost what’s most important.

[conservativejoy]

Yeah, like when we nominated Reagan...

[Sister_T]

Never take advice from those who want to destroy you.

[pacpam]

If the writers are Demos - ignore - it’s divide and conquer.
If the writers are Repubs - are they going to take their balls and go home?

[IronJack]

Yeah, far better the Republicans should nominate a lukewarm name-only conservative. Or better yet, a Democrat!

That would REALLY help their chances on election day.

[odawg]

Trying to plow and ready the field for another liberal for whichever position.

[MarvinStinson]

Gosh, how nice of the commie Washington Post to be so concerned about the Republicans.

[teletech]

What complete and utter RUBBISH!

[<1/1,000,000th%]

The comPost lying to us again.

[sam_whiskey]

Somebody needs to highlight what this article says about Trump’s probability of winning if he is the nominee. If I’m reading it correctly they give him a FIFTY FOUR percent chance of winning if he is the nominee. That’s shocking...

[Mr. K]

Thanks, libs, for warning us how we could lose to you. You sure are helpful like that.

We listened to you when you told us Romney had “elect-ability”

And when McCain was ‘Maverick’

Yep... you’re sure helful.

[KC_Lion]

Why Choose the lesser evil?

[4rcane]

what’s the point of winning election if winning means losing

[Mastador1]

RIGGGHT, then all those democrats that voted for Republicans will vote democrat in protest I suppose.

[Bobby_Taxpayer]

FU WAPO!

[Nifster]

That’s right because after all they assured me that the second rate actor was too old, too far right, and too crazy to be a good president.

Since they were so right in 1980, these libs must still know what they are talking about

[FlingWingFlyer]

These two pixies need to be worrying about their idiot candidate who has REAL problems that “could hurt them on Election Day.” She might even be in prison election night, God willing.