Posted on 04/13/2015 5:25:51 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Robert Mercer, a Long Island hedge fund magnate, has made some lavish investments over the years: There's his 203-foot super yacht, called the Sea Owl. There's the $2 million model train set he had custom-built in his mansion—and the lawsuit he filed against the builders, saying they'd overcharged him.
And now there's the money he's putting behind Ted Cruz's presidential ambitions.
Mercer is the main bankroller of a ring of four super-PACs supporting Cruz for president, the New York Times reported Friday. The PACs have collected $31 million in the four weeks since Cruz launched his campaign, giving the freshman Senator's bid for the Republican nomination a powerful start.
This is not Mercer's first foray into campaign finance. As Mother Jones previously reported, Mercer is a longtime Republican donor who shares Cruz's disdain for financial regulation. He has plowed millions into campaigns against lawmakers who have pushed to rein in Wall Street. Rep. Pete DeFazio (D–Ore.), who started an effort to tax high-frequency financial transactions, was the target of a Mercer campaign of more than half-a-million dollars. So was former Rep. Timothy Bishop (D–N.Y.), an ex-SEC prosecutor. In 2012, Mercer shoveled more than $900,000 into an effort to unseat Bishop. While Bishop held onto his seat, Mercer targeted him again in 2014—this time, with success. Also in 2012, Mercer pumped millions into two super PACs, headed by Karl Rove, that flooded the airwaves with ads for Mitt Romney and Republican candidates for Congress. Club For Growth, a free-market focused super PAC, has notched more than a half million from Mercer, too.
Given Mercer's views, it's no wonder that he would back the GOP presidential candidate who has mused about abolishing the IRS. But Mercer has felt the sting of financial oversight professionally, too. As Mariah Blake reported for Mother Jones in 2014, for several years, federal agents had been scrutinizing Renaissance, the hedge fund Mercer runs along with a business partner, Peter Brown.
Last year, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations got in on the action. In a hearing with Renaissance executives, its members accused the fund of using complicated financial maneuvers to avoid an estimated $6 billion in taxes. As Blake reported:
Renaissance is notoriously secretive about its investment formula. But documents released by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations in July offer some clues about the engine behind its growth. In 1999, Deutsche Bank—which did not respond to requests for comment—approached Renaissance and offered to package all of the Medallion fund's investments into a portfolio, or "basket," that was held in the bank's name. Under this arrangement, Renaissance would still control the trades and reap all the profits (minus the bank's generous fees). But it didn't have to pay short-term capital gains taxes on the underlying assets, even if they were only held for a few hours or days. (Short-term gains are taxed at 39 percent for the highest earners; long-term gains are taxed at roughly half that rate.)
"Renaissance profited from this tax treatment by insisting on the fiction that it didn't really own the stocks it traded—that the banks that Renaissance dealt with, did," Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the ranking Republican on the subcommittee, said during the recent hearing. "But, the fact is that Renaissance did all the trading, maintained full control over the account…and reaped all of the profits."
The company has denied any wrongdoing and the IRS investigation is ongoing.
Despite his outsized giving, Mercer is described by those who know him as quiet and intensely private. But as Bradley Smith, a campaign finance expert, pointed out to the Times, his money will do plenty of talking for him: The cash "sends the message to other donors that Cruz is a serious guy…And that brings in other donors."
Hedge funder. Again. I chose the wrong line of work.
BFD, the liberals have guys that play with real trains.
Need to see the train set before formulating an opinion.
Chelsea’s hubby runs one and it’s doing poorly.
Maybe he’d hire you to help improve performance.
Good idea. Lets start looking at Hillary’s ‘big money donors’.
He’s bad because he has a train set, but he’d be okay if he tried to bankrupt Indonesia, Thailand or the U.K.
As long as the train doesn’t go to an island of underage girls, I’m ok with it!
[ He’s bad because he has a train set, but he’d be okay if he tried to bankrupt Indonesia, Thailand or the U.K. ]
At least train set guy is not waging an active war on women like Hillary’s donors from Saudi Inbred country....
This is what we got in 2008 when the journ-0-lists spent all their time investigating the status of Joe the Plumber’s trade license and the DNA of Palin’s Down Syndrome child.
Instead of the clearly fraudulent history of Baraq Obama.
It’s disgusting.
I completely agree. There won’t be any.
Having said that, we are now in the “let me buy a President” phase of our Republic and it is going to kill our Nation ... and soon.
Just because they will ignore Jebbie and Hildabeast doesn’t make me any happier about this.
Not as impressive as 0bamas’ supporters; who have $500 million bankrupt solar companies, $650 million failed database projects and the like.
Oh and by the way...did I mention that the guy with the $2 MM train set paid for it with his own money? Whereas the multi-million dollar failures of this admin- YOU paid for them.
Maybe I should have said “successful” hedge funder. It’s hard work and certain amount of luck and it wouldn’t interest me really, but the rewards can be nice.
Anyway, God bless Cruz and I hope they are afraid.
So you think that Rubio, Huckabee, Rand Paul, Newt, Santorum, Walker and the rest don’t avail themselves of similar donors?
RailDreams Gallery
http://www.raildreams.com/gallery.html
There is not logical reason why stock traders should enjoy a lower rate on their taxes than a successful doctor or plumber, in my opinion. But they have amassed so much money that they can buy the political influence to get the legislation that keeps them getting these rates.
This is another worrisome sign to me about what we can expect from Cruz vis-a-vis big banking and hedge funds. His wife, after all, is an executive at Goldmann-Sachs. (currently on leave). It's unlikely we are going to see him reign in big-finance.
Of course it's equally or more unlikely that Hillary will. She's take mega-bucks from the NY banks for since the 2000s. Her daughter is married to a Hedge Fund manager, the son of a rich investment banker.
I'm looking for someone not controlled by Wall Street. Maybe there is no such candidate, in which case, we really are screwed.
The cash “sends the message to other donors that Cruz is a serious guy…And that brings in other donors.”
I hope I don’t step on toes, but I’d feel more comfortable not reading about Mr Mercer hedge fund guy.
Is the underlying question - should a billionaire hedge funder owning our politicians something that should make us happy or sad?
Some industrialists (they actually make stuff) say that financiers make deals, but produce nothing tangible. The financiers buy off our politicians with their pocket change and create what we call crony capitalism. I haven’t seen anything to convince me otherwise on any side of the political spectrum.
There are some who believe that the expansion of the financier class has been directly proportional to the collapse of the USA “we make it happen class”, that once represented the fundamental backbone of America. Financiers make nothing happen except expansion of their own bank accounts and bailouts from taxpayers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.