Posted on 02/08/2015 4:48:27 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Mark Krikorian has some extended commentary this weekend over at the corner which takes a long look at one of the larger questions looming over Jeb Bushs nascent presidential ambitions. It deals with the issue of comprehensive immigration reform and has less to do with whether or not Bush fundamentally agrees with Barack Obama on immigration (the general consensus there is that he does) and more to do with what this says about the candidates fundamental view of the American worker. The title is, The Peasants Are Revolting, So Lets Get New Ones. Its a great, humorous header, but the substance raises serious questions.
What started off the discussion was the rather tough David Frum piece which AP discussed here at length last week. While our readers had a chance to kick it around a bit at the time, lets revisit one of the key passages which the NR gang is teeing off on.
Bush seems to have something more in mind than just the familiar (if overstated) claim that immigration can counter the aging of the population. He seems to think that there is some quality in the immigrants themselves that is more enterprisingmore dynamic to use his favorite termthan native-born Americans. This is not only a positive judgment on the immigrants themselves. It is also a negative judgment on native-born Americans.
Frum was even more incensed during an interview with Laura Ingraham.
[Jeb] is not satisfied with America as he inherited it, and he talks a lot about how we cant achieve prosperity merely with our existing demographics He seems to think that native-born Americans arent enterprising enough, arent energetic enough, dont love their families enough. The solution, the way to repair the troubles of America is to change America through immigration by importing people who are somehow better than native-born.
To offer the Benefit-Of-The-Doubt perspective, Krikorian cites our friend Jim Geraghty who tosses out a rhetorical question.
There may be a molecule or two of truth in here, no? Dont many Americans take the blessings, rights, and freedoms of being born American for granted? Isnt one of our most common laments that too many Americans embrace this philosophy of entitlement and whining victimhood, while we see legal immigrants coming here and working their butts off and being thankful for the opportunity to live the American dream?
Marks response is worth reading in full, rather than just a snippet here, and he raises a very valid point which Ill chime in on. I absolutely agree that there is a common and totally justifiable tendency for many of us to admire those from other countries who demonstrate the dedication and effort to go through the legal immigration process, long though that road might be. We cheer on those who come to the United States as naturalized citizens, work hard and make something of themselves. Such examples are a rather powerful totem which reminds us of what our nation can be at its best. But by the same token, as Mark points out, the many blessings which citizens enjoy here can also provide a temptation for some to take the good life for granted. Its equally true that many of the native born wind up failing to excel and achieve great things if they choose to take a path of less resistance.
But the underlying assumptions of the attitude on display in Jeb Bushs comments can rightly be seen as rather insulting to the native born. How much any of us achieve is predicated on the knowledge that we live in a society which assures everyone equality of opportunity, not of outcome. A view of America which seems to yearn for filling the ranks with those who are somehow genetically more predisposed to hard work and achievement doesnt speak well of Americans as a herd. Achievement comes in many forms. Not everyone will eventually found the next General Electric. For many, great achievement comes in the form of a good job which allows them to have a fine home, raise a family and prepare for retirement. And if not enough people are achieving that, the solution should be to provide a more level playing field, with lower taxes, vigorous growth and greater job opportunities. Flooding the zone with newcomers based on your assumption that they will do better than the locals is problematic at best.
Columba Bush....the tiny DUTY TAX CHEATER!!!!
Yes.
That was rhetorical, right? He is a Bush after all.
Good God.
The bottom line is that Jebbie and his ilk do not like pesky, trouble makers who have an independent streak and insist on all that “abide by the constitution” stuff—in other words conservatives and Tea Party types. Jebbie and his fellow elitists want a compliant worker class who will not question their “betters”, and who will keep their mouths shut, work, and do as they’re told.
Since there is still a sizable contingent of Americans that are fiercely independent, do not want big government, and are willing to take the elitists and establishment types on, Jebbie’s plan is to displace them with even more massive immigration.
I think it’s all that and much more.
I think he may well have that. And good luck winning an election when you hate the voters you’re expecting to vote for you.
Jeb just needs to go set up shop in Mexico. He and we would all be happier.
Ugh. Is that our new Bush Empress?
Lets face it to the Bushes Americans will never be a good as Mexicans
God must be punishing us to get this crap family again. Its not enough they opened the gates of hell now they want taco sauce on us. Might as well go for the Imam.
Stay out da Booshies. They’ve done enough liberal damage.
The sleazy Canadian opportunist David Frum is coming off as more of an American patriot than Jeb Bush.
That says it all.
Yeah, schooled by squish David Frum. Ouch!
Take your smuggler wife, druggie daughter and stalker son with you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.