Now read the article.
It’s a wordy, unfocused article based on a lot of hypotheticals. As far as I can tell, the author has their heart in the right place, but I found this hard to slog through. They should learn to just say what they want to say,
Ditto that. Sheesh it is not that hard to understand this article!
He’s giving two scenarios in which one of “our guys” might have a chance to win and giving more detail on the second option.
It’s one that many of us have suggested over and over. We have debates between invited conservative candidates all through one summer, and then ALL conservatives agree to get behind the winner. (jeb, mitt, etc need not apply). So Cruz, Walker, etc would duke it out in an arena of our own choosing, not in debates sit up and established by the liberal media and the elite. OUR debates run OUR way. Conservatives decide which constitutional candidate wins our support and then we pull together and throw all our support to him.
It’s obvious some on the thread are not reading the article.
I hope the Republicans nominate a Ted Cruz limited government Christian conservative type. But I am NOT holding my breath.
The real question is, what is the smartest way to vote, the best way to help conservatives in Congress, in the 2016 presidential if it's another 2012 scenario of Dem vs Dem Lite?