Posted on 11/27/2014 6:26:20 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
While I have no doubt that the government planned these riots, and clearly wanted them to occur, I do not believe their purpose was to distract from anything, because no one is paying attention to anything this man does, and no one in power is going to do anything to stop any of them or address any of them in any way at all.
To leave Obama in office after impeachment without restraining him with a conviction would be like angering a rabid bear.
Obama can not be embarrassed nor is he capable of feeling shame.
It is going to take every gut muscle we got.
Andrew Johnson (not Jackson) was impeached.
gop-e and rinos don’t want to b/c they want to run the presidency the same way’when they think they can win it.
that’s why nothing outrageous gets changed back, or fought against. the just want to be the ones in charge screwing the people.
they have a much better chance after january 3rd. find some vulnerble democrat senators that live in states that allow recalls.
Obama would just pardon himself. Voila. Unimpeached.
But, 0bama could always issue a pardon for himself and an executive action reversing any conviction.
He as already stated that he can make immigration law, and he has.
Andrew Johnson
You are not the only guy.
I have to confess- I just became aware that I am an “inveterate Obama hater”.
Too bad none of the legal scholars in congress UNDERSTAND the law enough to KNOW that they can...
No, actually in some precincts it was 110, 115, or 120 % of registered voters.....
Obama will never go Quietly ,Impeached or End of term
******
Does it mean that President Obama has the power to issue executive orders whenever and how often he wishes concerning any topic?
For instance, what happens if in the middle of January 2015,next month, Obama decides that his recent immigration executive order does not cover enough people, so he decides to issue ANOTHER executive order covering another 5,000,000 illegals from all over the world and increasing visas for Tech Workers to 1,000,000, mostly from India and China. Can he do that?
Is Obama arrogantly telling us that he has the legal power to sign any executive order, and there is nothing we can do about it legally? how awful that is if true.
Who cares. Just do it.
As annieokie said a few days ago, and I seconded, they’re already rioting, so no one can use that excuse anymore.
That doesn't really matter.
The question to answer is, "Which course of action best serves the long term interests of our republic?"
“We are not sure, to this day, how many of those votes were illegal.”
True, but we still have a nascent pure democracy that’s backed by a high percentage of the population with no attempt contemplated at stopping it with any certainty.
Legal votes or not, we are still stuck with a subverted electoral system where uncounted votes are miraculously found in the trunks of election workers and military absentee votes are deemed to be “too late to be counted”.
The revolution goes on comrade.
IMHO
Not until late January.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.