Posted on 10/19/2014 5:57:09 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
For all the analysis which correctly notes that associating with President Barack Obama is no relief for Democrats running in 2014, particularly those in red states, it is those Democratic politicians running as “Clinton Democrats” who are watching their campaigns implode.
“Self-proclaimed Clinton Democrats are struggling this election cycle, and not even their powerful namesakes may be enough to save them,” The Hill reported on Sunday. “Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have tried to turn on their charms to help centrist Democrats in Kentucky and Arkansas. But as candidates in both states are slipping, help from the party’s preeminent power couple is falling short.”
The Hill noted two of the most prominent examples of Democratic candidates shunning the president in favor of the Clinton label, Kentucky Secretary of State Allison Lundergan Grimes and Arkansas Sen. Mark Pryor, are rapidly seeing their electoral prospects dwindle.
Even where former President Bill Clinton served as governor for two terms and remains wildly popular, he is getting little traction in the effort to ensure Democrats retain control of that state’s Senate seat and governor’s mansion. “Despite their close ties to the Clintons, their efforts to distance themselves from a deeply unpopular current president may not work,” The Hill reported.
In a way, it would be a mistake to read too much into this dynamic. It is a midterm cycle, after all, and it is only a party’s most partisan voters (primarily the energized supporters of the out-party) who usually turn out in midterm years. What is instructive ahead of 2016 are those Democrats who are enthused to turn out in support of liberal candidates this cycle. It’s not pro-Clinton moderates, but Obama-backing progressives who are most likely to head to the polls despite anti-Democratic headwinds.
With the exception of Pew Research Center, few polling outlets break down respondents by ideology in that granular a fashion, but most who provide cross tabs do poll by ideology and party affiliation. A recent Washington Post/ABC News survey revealed that, among just registered voters, 65 percent of self-described liberal voters were “absolutely certain” to vote in November. Another 14 percent said they “probably” would vote while 15 percent more self-identified liberals said their likelihood to vote was no better than 50-50. Among registered Democrats, 63 percent said they were “certain” to vote while 17 percent conceded they might not show up at the polls at all.
And this is on a national level. In those Appalachian states that voted for Bill Clinton twice but have since grown only more Republican, that trend is likely to be more pronounced.
Republicans, however, remain wary of the Clinton brand, even in this year’s GOP-leaning contests. “I’m not worried about Bill Clinton’s support for Mark Pryor,” Rep. Tom Cotton (R-AR) recently told ABC News. “I’m worried about Mark Pryor’s support for Barack Obama.”
That is the line that will most hurt Pryor among Republican-leaning and centrist voters in Arkansas, and it is the association that will damage Grimes most in Kentucky. But Obama’s core supporters in these states – single women, students, African-Americans – who are the least likely to forget to vote on November 4 and who likely resent the distance from the president that “Clinton Democrats” are currently trying to seek. If there are lessons to be learned for 2016 in these contests, they are in that dynamic.
Christians worship Christ as their Savior.
Clinton Democrats are the same, only different.
They have to try to run as “Clinton democrats” because they know “Obama democrats” is a sure loser.
I don’t know where they’re getting that Clinton can help candidates across the finish line. They’ve had negative coattails for over 20 years.
No ‘Clinton Democrat’ has ever run successfully, except for one. In order to win as a ‘Clinton Democrat’, you have to be Bill Clinton, it’s that simple.
So, the rats are in trouble. What is the GOPe doing to get them out of trouble?
The Democrat base wants to be as liberal as possible.
The GOP base wants to be as conservative as possible.
The Democrat leadership wants to make its base as happy as possible.
The GOP leadership wants to makes its base as disappointed as possible.
Here endeth the lesson.
crash and burn? I am just devastated, heartbroken, sad, depressed. So badly I could just scream!!!
Maybe the damn clintons will get the message and go back to Arkansas? Naw, didn’t think so.
They’re only identifying themselves as “Clinton democrats” because they know being an “Obama democrat” is a sure loser. They actually think Clinton was a “winner”.
These days, just what is a “centrist Democrat?”
They’ll let some of the Tea Party live after the revolution, but as slaves or internees in concentration camps, instead of slaughtering each and every one.
I never thought that I could despise any two people more than I despised the Clintons. Then, along came the Obamas. The rest is history.
He’s trying to echo Donna:
Democrats who run from Obama take a risk
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/3217005/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.