Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brent Budowsky: GOP peaked too soon
The Hill ^ | September 17, 2014 | Brent Budowsky, former Democratic aide

Posted on 09/18/2014 1:26:30 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The danger to a political party when pundits almost unanimously predict a nation-shaking victory for that party is that, quietly and thoughtfully, voters concerned about the future of their families and country ask themselves: Will we be better off if this party wins complete control of Congress?

For many days, the bastions of Republican power in Washington have gloated with triumphalism about a coming GOP wave. Pundit race-callers and statistical prognosticators have told voters the election is over. The Drudge Report has regaled its readers with echo-chamber links to tales of demonic Democrats; GOP columnists have written about what Republicans should do after they inevitably seize power; and neoconservatives have promised a return to the glory days of former Vice President Dick Cheney.

But then, what happened?

In North Carolina, Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan began to pick up steam. In Colorado, Democratic Sen. Mark Udall began to gain more support. And several statistical prognosticators have increased their odds that Democrats retain control of the Senate.

Of course other states are still trending toward the GOP in an election that is shaping up, not as a Republican wave, but as a razor-thin cliffhanger between the parties. In a handful of states, there is some evidence — inconclusive but worth watching — of a nascent mini-Democratic counter-wave.

The Republicans peaked too soon. The chorus of predictions of GOP victory have led swing voters to more carefully consider how to vote and Democratic base voters to more urgently consider whether to vote. What do they see? What is the Republican plan for power and how will it affect their lives?

Republicans promise they will continue to hate President Obama with a fanatical passion and politics of total gridlock. They promise to continue investigating Benghazi forever. They pledge to loathe Lois Lerner, vow to defeat the minimum wage and promise to prevent pay equity for women. They promise to prove that climate change does not exist and to destroy ObamaCare — but are silent on what they would do to replace it or improve healthcare. They vow to arrest Hispanic Dreamers and send them back where they belong. They vow to despise Hillary Clinton as much as they despise Barack Obama and despised Franklin Roosevelt, John Kennedy and the hugely popular Bill Clinton, whom they tried to impeach while he was accomplishing the things that made him America’s most popular living former president.

The Republicans peaked too soon because reports of their predicted victory drove voters to take an earlier-than-usual and closer-than-usual look at what they would actually do in power. When voters look, they see an agenda that is almost exclusively aimed at turning out the GOP base, almost exclusively negative and almost exclusively dominated by attacks against people Republicans despise and policies Republicans oppose.

The GOP has become the “we hate Obama” party. Its message emanates from an echo chamber of negativity that repels swing voters, motivates Democratic voters and offers nothing to improve the lives of Americans who are not partisan Republicans or far-right fanatics.

Will the recent uptick for some Democrats continue and spread? I don’t know that, but I do know this: three weeks ago, I predicted Hagan would win because the more voters urgently focus on the stakes of the election, the more they gravitate toward widely respected Democrats, from highly respected political families, who believe in governing across the aisle. And the more they gravitate to Democrats, the more they reject a GOP that acts like a gridlock-championing “hate Obama” cult without any plans to create jobs, raise wages, improve healthcare or make life better for most Americans. So far, that call is looking good.

Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), Sen. Mark Begich (D-Alaska) and Michelle Nunn are widely respected Democrats from highly respected political families who believe in governing across the aisle. Stay tuned for movement in their races — and don’t forget Kansas, where even many GOP voters are rejecting the brand of Republicanism that peaked too soon in 2014.

*****

Budowsky was an aide to former Sen. Lloyd Bentsen and Bill Alexander, then chief deputy majority whip of the House. He holds an LL.M. degree in international financial law from the London School of Economics.


TOPICS: Issues; Parties; U.S. Congress; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: 2014; benghazi; democrats; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
FWIW
1 posted on 09/18/2014 1:26:30 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He’s probably right. Therefore, all the Democrat voters can relax and stay home and all the GOP inclined voters need to turn out to prevent this from being a total wipeout like 2006 or 2008.


2 posted on 09/18/2014 1:29:41 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The GOP has become the “we hate Obama” party. Its message emanates from an echo chamber of negativity

Can't disagree much with that. The GOP has done nothing to articulate a vision for America. We don't even hear a cohesive message about what it plans for Obamacare. They'd been warned for a year the "we hate Obama" angle only plays for so long.

3 posted on 09/18/2014 1:30:13 PM PDT by ScottinVA (If it doesn't include border security, it isn't "reform." It's called "amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Yes, I trust anything this guy says...


4 posted on 09/18/2014 1:32:35 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The GOP has become the “we hate Obama” party

In that case they should be a shoe in.

5 posted on 09/18/2014 1:34:49 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (It takes a gun to feed a village,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
delusional
6 posted on 09/18/2014 1:34:59 PM PDT by JPG ("So sue me". OK, we will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The GOP peaked too soon? Heck, I thought it was trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory and give it to the Donkeys. That’s what all those highly paid failed advisers — Karl Rove — have been spewing along with open war on the party’s base. The Stupid Party never ceases to demonstrate its stupidity.


7 posted on 09/18/2014 1:35:05 PM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
GOP peaked too soon

More like the GOP pricked too soon.

8 posted on 09/18/2014 1:49:18 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
In that case they should be a shoe in.

That's what they said about Larry Craig:)

9 posted on 09/18/2014 1:51:46 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Republicans peaked when their GOP-E candidates were vulnerable and being held accountable.

When they screwed their base, they screwed their chances.


10 posted on 09/18/2014 1:51:54 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("Compromise" means you've already decided you lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

Well said, Colonel Flagg.


11 posted on 09/18/2014 1:55:40 PM PDT by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
They peaked too soon. Like yesterday. I guess.

LOL.

NYT/CBS News Poll: Super ugly for Democrats

According to a newly-released New York Times/CBS News poll, Democrats may be in even bigger trouble than originally thought - as the mid terms approach.

The poll, taken September 12-15, shows that Obama and Democrats could be in for a repeat "shellacking" this November.

Obama's overall job approval still stands at 40%. CBS notes that his is "5 points lower than it was heading into the 2010 congressional elections, when Republicans won control of the House of Representatives."

On ISIS, almost 60% feel Obama is not "being tough enough." The president's approval rating on foreign policy sits at an abysmal 34%.

And on nearly every major issue, important to the voters, Republicans lead Democrats.

By double digits.

On terrorism, the GOP is up a whopping 21 points, 52-31.

On the economy, Republicans hold an 11 point lead, 49-38.

On foreign policy, it's Republicans, again by double digits, 49-37.



Even on the generic ballot, it's the GOP, 45-39 - a six point spread.

The GOP also hold a double digit lead on the enthusiasm factor - Republicans 45, Independents 36, Democrats 33.

And that much talked about gender gap? This even portends badly for Democrats.

Republicans lead with men by 14 points, 49-35. While Democrats cling to a one point lead, 43-42, with women.

The Independent vote is also going the GOP's way, by a healthy 40 to 31 percent margin.

Relative to geography, Republicans take the 'suburban' (49-38) and 'rural' (55-32) voters. While Democrats pick up support from urban voters, 46-33.

Etc.

Now. Did you take all that in?



Because here's how the WH reporter from the NY Times, Julie Davis, tried to spin her own poll, on Twitter.

NYT/CBS Poll finds both parties deeply unpopular, Rs worse than Ds...but 55% of GOP is voting against Obama in Nov http://t.co/BROx3JftPR— Julie Davis (@juliehdavis) September 17, 2014



Yep. "Rs worse than Ds."

Now that's funny.

Robert-DeNiro-Laughing
12 posted on 09/18/2014 2:01:38 PM PDT by nhwingut (This tagline for lease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yup, the GOP peaked around 1985.


13 posted on 09/18/2014 2:03:44 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

John Boehner kicked them into the Prevent Defense with fourteen minutes to go in the 4th. quarter.


14 posted on 09/18/2014 2:04:47 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPG

What’s wrong with this guy’s head? It looks like a football standing on end.


15 posted on 09/18/2014 2:09:20 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

The republicans don’t have a generic race in November. They have many varied races.

All liberal republicans must be politically destroyed in either the primary or the general election.

/johnny


16 posted on 09/18/2014 2:10:41 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Maybe the GOP base has a hard time getting enthused about a party that has openly declared war on them.


17 posted on 09/18/2014 2:11:56 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Wrong, the Democrats might have a momentary “blip” but they will FALL come election day! bank on it..


18 posted on 09/18/2014 2:30:07 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Who is this humanoid? Never heard of this _______.


19 posted on 09/18/2014 2:30:50 PM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
The republicans don’t have a generic race in November. They have many varied races.

Thanks for the breaking news. I didn't know that. I thought these polls were to measure the electorate's temp, and gauge the mood of the country. I assumed its purpose was relative to the mid terms. That, traditionally, if a party leads by double digits, on the issues most important to the voters, it portends, sort of, badly for the other party. And that while each race has its own dynamics, the national polls have a history of being strong indicators.

But your point is well taken. Candidates like Landrieu and Pryor and Begich are Udall probably much preferred by the voters.
20 posted on 09/18/2014 2:33:02 PM PDT by nhwingut (This tagline for lease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson