Posted on 12/15/2013 4:46:32 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Why do you assume I even wrote it?
Huckster needs to shaddup
The "powers that be" = DemocRAT and Republican just want us all to shut up, pull down our shorts, bend over and take what they want to force upon us from ObamaDEATHcontrol to ILLEGAL ALIEN AMNESTY, to the CARPET BAGGING, ANTI-GUN, RINO Scott Brown running for the NH Senate seat to "Fill in the blank." The whole lot of them are nefarious From Obamessiah to Bonier and can not be trusted. They do not care about America, they do not care about representing their constituents or the American CITIZENS. All they care about is maintaining THEIR POWER and THEIR POSITION and THEIR AGENDA.
Huckabee is just a shill for all of the above, hiding behind an "aw shucks" façade.
In spite of some of his flaws, boy do I miss Glen Beck on FOX. At least he had the guts to present the TRUTH without compromising his conservative principles.
You wouldn’t plug it otherwise.
Huck is an ASS.
I plug stuff all the time I don’t do…….and comment on it…..and debate it….here and otherwise….often re posting other FREEPERS comments by saying the comments were so good they deserved to be repeated…...but then again, I am here for the issues.
You are here to overcompensate for what must be a lot of personal shortcomings by playing rent a cop. You cannot apparently comment on the issues…..
Every now and then Huckabee needs to ‘scold’ democrats.
Nah, he'd rather scold Rush and Hannity for saying stuff on the radio just to make money and get ratings……it allows him to feel so much more self righteous that way.
>>> and I hope your radar has made the same sounds when Ricky Santuckabee appears on your screen as well
not familiar with this guy... we’ve had no cable tv for over 3 years.
Rick Santorum…..
Huckabee wants a job in the next republican administration. Or the democrat administration.
Shouldn't the Tea Party be scolding Huckabee...???
LOLOL!!! And I just love Burt Lancaster!
Hmmmmm. I remember "conservative" talk radio host Hugh Hewitt hailing Warren as the quintessential conservative, and I admit I fell for it until I read Warren's "Purpose Driven Life" and got to know the general mindset and type in his flock first hand. I remember FR being a wonderful place where smart conservatives were seeing through him the same way I was beginning to, and I found FR rather heartening and home-like! But no doubt, many others on FR did cling to the "conservative" Warren myth.
Rule of thumb when it comes to religious leaders: Big Church = Big Government. Whether it's Romney, Warren, or Huck.
You got that one right, CEW. But there will be those who say that rejecting Santorum is engaging in "circular firing squad" behavior. Funny how in this so-called "circular" arrangement, limited government conservatives pretty much all aim at the same guys, like Santorum, who has voted to increase minimum wage many times, refused to cut food stamps, wanted to stop tax money for abortion-friendly Planned Parenthood (good!) but instead of returning that money to individual taxpayers to spend as they please, advocated to keep the tax funding in place but spend it instead on adoption programs because you KNOW the government has to get involved!!!!!! (bad).
The thing that disgusted me most about Santorum was his constant "family values" gimmick. Smarmy, phony, feel-good Hallmark Channel "family values" empty saccarine. As if people who didn't have big families were second-class citizens. Appealing on "family values" is as divisive and phony as appealing on ethnic or racial grounds. Good, righteous values are good and righteous whether being practiced in "families" or not. And if "good family values" lead to prosperity (which Santorum claimed on his website during the 2012 primaries), then Mexico, where family is about the most important thing to the people there, would be much more prosperous than it is.
Santorum is every bit as lame as Huck, you are correct.
And I wonder what Santorum would have answered if anyone had ever asked him: "Rick, what is the difference between 'family values' and 'Christian values,' and if they are the same, then why use the term 'family values' when there are many Christians with either no children or who don't make their kids and offspring the focus of their existence?"
The real answer, of course, is because Santorum used the term "family values" in order to remind people that Gingrich had been divorced, and St. Ricky, much holier than most others, hadn't.
Rick Santorum disgusts me, and CEW, as you are informed politically, do you think that he'll throw his hat in the ring again for the 2016 primaries?
Yep, well stated, and so correct. Especially about the smarm factor. I never understood how some otherwise intelligent folks could miss that one…...
SWIVE YOU FAT BOY!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.