I would greatly prefer Sarah to Obama as President.
However, IMO if she had been the nominee she would have presided over a landslide defeat of historic proportions and perhaps have lost the GOP control of the House.
I have been forced to recognize the unpleasant fact that most of my fellow American don’t agree with me.
I have no idea what’s wrong with them, the fools. :)
What difference would it make?
“I would greatly prefer Sarah to Obama as President.”
“However, IMO if she had been the nominee she would have presided over a landslide defeat of historic proportions and perhaps have lost the GOP control of the House.”
If Palin can pull in 60,000 at a speech, and pull 60,000,000 million votes with John McCain (unless you think HE energized the base) why would she lose in a defeat of historic proportions?.....I am amazed when I start conversations in public, at check out lines, and the day before the election even, the gentleman told me he and his wife would love to have Sarah Palin as Commander In Chief......She overcame all the trash and lies the media threw her way and still pulled McCain/Palin over the line with an astounding number of votes......The votes are out there once the momentum begins and she starts speaking the truth on the real issues concerning this thuggish administration....Romney should have forced Bengazi into the last debate, I think Palin would have, and the media would have been forced to cover it....They could have spun it any way they wanted, but THAT would have energized those same 60,000,000 and possibly more that she was a conservative leader with guts to confront the machine IN YOUR FACE style......Now the voter fraud is a completely different story and a HUGE problem to overcome......