[factmart]

I said I would vote for Obabma before Jeb Bush. I cannot stand American Royalty.

I will Vote for Romney before Obama Or Jeb Bush.

I'm no Reagan, Reagan would vote for Romney or Jeb Bush before Obama.

Where do you stand?

[Finny]

Where do I stand? Well, I wouldn't vote for Obama, and I probably would vote for Jeb Bush because his record isn't even remotely in the same neighborhood as Romney's, not even close.

You, on the other hand, would vote for Obama in that circumstance, apparently.

You don't know what Reagan would do, and it is disgusting that you presume to speak for him. That you presume to do so makes you pretty small.

Where do I stand? I am voting FOR a plurality by splitting the vote via third party, in an effort to make it so whichever big-government authoritarian statist wins, Obama or Romney, gets in on the slimmest plurality possible. A president who takes office when the majority of Americans voted against him, is weak, defensive, and vulnerable. Witness Bill Clinton, who got in on a 43% plurality -- a full 57% of Americans voted against him, and he got his butt kicked in the midterms with the Republican Revolution. Does anyone seriously think the Republican Revolution would have happened if Clinton had won with a majority, or if HW Bush had been re-elected?

I accept the hard truth that there is no such thing as voting "against" a candidate -- there is only voting FOR a candidate as the price to prevent (vote "against") a different candidate from winning. Neither I nor any other American can vote "against" Obama OR Romney; we can ONLY vote for someone else. THERE IS NO VOTING 'AGAINST.'

I will be voting FOR a plurality to weaken the victory of whichever government tyrant wins, Obama or Romney.