[2ndDivisionVet]

Wouldn't Team Obama love that?

[onyx]

I have been posting this all along.

If Iowa wants to remain serious, Iowa will not allow Ron Paul and his lunatics to win this.

GO GINGICH!

IGNORE THE HIT PIECE ADS!

[iowamark]

If Paul wins Iowa, it will not be because of Republicans but because of Dems re-registering as Republican on caucus night. There are Democrats here in Iowa trying to organize that.

[goodnesswins]

who won Iowa in 2008?

[Lazlo in PA]

I don’t understand why the GOP apparatus lets a straight up Libertarian in these debates and elections. If his ideas are so aces, he should hit the trail under his true banner and sell it. His phony nonsense with pretending he is a Conservative just to use a better mechanism to get heard is tiresome.

[Apollo5600]

If Paul wins Iowa, it isn’t because of his foreign policy. It’s because the alternatives were seen as being untrustworthy and “progressive”.

Ron Paul is a fruitcake on foreign policy, but one can tell that he does what he says he will. Character goes a long way in getting a person elected.

[Smokin' Joe]

No matter where you stand on Ron Paul, I would crap on someone on the radio telling me who I could or could not vote for "if I wanted my state to be taken seriously".

Are Americans little whiny children that they can't make up their own mind without this sort of junior high level peer pressure? Sheesh.

[Vendome]

Enema

[hosepipe]

Whoever is NOT for the Constitution is the enemy of Iowa..

Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate for the Constitution..
Others are for partial Constitutional Law... not complete Constitutional Law..

The American Constitution was written down specifically to protect "the People" in the States from the Federal Government..
Every time you amend the Constitution you inhibit the (people in the)States NOT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT..

Which is the problem a Federal Government gone completely wild.. rabid actually..