Sarah Palin Presidential Run: Will She Run for Office?

International Business Times ^ | August 18, 2011

[editor-surveyor]

One of the Sarah threads has a link to the Megyn Kelly interview where she said it.

[editor-surveyor]

Here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2765652/posts

[editor-surveyor]

>> “The right-wing Leftists (aka RINOs) in the GOP will do what they can to stop her from running if she decides to do so” <<

.
They’ve been doing it for close to three years now.

[ansel12]

Didn’t Palin support or endorse about a hundred candidates in 2010?

[eyedigress]

I think it was 400 candidates, yet she knew they would be pulling for American sovereignty and kicked them to the curb. s.

[SoConPubbie]

I am curious about the “amnesty” policy the column attributes to Palin, and how that holds up among her supporters?

I wonder how Rick Perry's support for the following holds up among his supporters:

1. Against a border wall
2. Against Interior Enforcement provided by laws like AZ1070
3. Supports Comprehensive Immigration Reform
4. Against using E-Verify to help effectively lesson the ability of Illegal Aliens to get work in the US

So Rick Perry wants to burn through more TaxPayer cash by putting more people on the border, an approach that have never been shown to lesson the crush of Illegal Aliens, and eschews every approach that is effective in lessoning Illegal Immigration and you want to take Governor Palin and her supporters to task?

Try getting your own house in order before pointing fingers at someone else.

[SoConPubbie]

Sarah will endorse Perry before mid September

Don't put to much hope in that Hope!

She came out in the Meghan Kelly interview today and said she didn't seen anyone in the current list of candidates she could really support.

I guess Hope springs eternal, even in the face of facts, for you Perry Supporters.

[SoConPubbie]

Isn’t it hilarious how much the Perrydrones are so against Palin yet still dreaming and wishing she’ll endorse Jimmy Rick?

Yes, and look how they will brook no discussion about the non-conservative words and Actions of Perry and will Deny, Deny, Deny, and if that does not work make excuses for every bad action.

It would appear they have a real bad case of Hypocrisy.

[SoConPubbie]

Sorry NewzJunkey, in today’s Meghan Kelly interview she stated flat-out there was no-one in the race today she could really support.

WIshing it is so or falsely posting a picture when she supported him for GOVERNOR is not the same as when he is running for President.

Apparently, she thinks he is good enough to be Governor of Texas when he was running against a strong candidate who was also a very big RINO in Kay Baily Hutchinson, but as for being President of the US, not so much.

But you keep hoping Newsjunkey, miracles can happen.

[NELSON111]

I guess that’s a no.

[9YearLurker]

The article is a pretty crappy unsigned analysis of ‘electability’. Romney? He’s McCain II as far as electability is concerned.

[EDINVA]

Thanks. Leaving aside all the politics and tea leaf reading, amazing to see two spectacularly beautiful, bright, quick, accomplished women. “We’ve come a long way, baby!”

[RitaOK]

SP is said to be for “amnesty” and you are stuck on Perry opposition to a border wall? BwahahaHa!

[SoConPubbie]

SP is said to be for “amnesty” and you are stuck on Perry opposition to a border wall? BwahahaHa!
No, I'm stuck on Perry's complete abdication of any conservative principles where Illegal Immigration is concerned.

Perry is against any effective means of even limiting Illegal Immigration.

He has stated publicly the following positions:

1. Against the usage of E-Verify which would lower the number of Illegal Aliens being able to work in the US which would make the whole proposition of coming here illegaly less-attractive to those considering coming here illegally.
2. Against a border-fence/border-wall which would also have the effect of slowing immigration to a trickle as the border wall in southern California already proved by reducing Illegal Immigration by around 90% in those areas where the fence was installed.
3. Against AZ1070 whose measures provide for effective interior enforcement (away from the border) once again making the whole idea of being here illegally unattractive and also removing the incentive to come here illegally.
4. He is for Comprehensive Immigration Reform, which in all of it's forms offered up has always been either out-in-out Amnesty, or some forms of back-door amnesty
.
Whereas, Sarah Palin has spoken out forcefully for 2 and 3 (Rick is against 2 and 3) and since E-Verify is wrapped up in 3, she is defact in support of that as well, the only ding I have against her is her (I believe) stated support for Comprehensive Immigration Reform while VP for John McCain, which in my mind, was nothing more than supporting the top of the ticket and which her strong vocal of both AZ1070 and a physical border fence, that would seem to bear out my conclusion.

All of which begs the question, why would you support somebody so weak on border issues?

Are you not a conservative?

[SoConPubbie]

SP is said to be for “amnesty” and you are stuck on Perry opposition to a border wall? BwahahaHa!

No, I'm stuck on Perry's complete abdication of any conservative principles where Illegal Immigration is concerned.

Perry is against any effective means of even limiting Illegal Immigration.

He has stated publicly the following positions:

1. Against the usage of E-Verify which would lower the number of Illegal Aliens being able to work in the US which would make the whole proposition of coming here illegaly less-attractive to those considering coming here illegally.
2. Against a border-fence/border-wall which would also have the effect of slowing immigration to a trickle as the border wall in southern California already proved by reducing Illegal Immigration by around 90% in those areas where the fence was installed.
3. Against AZ1070 whose measures provide for effective interior enforcement (away from the border) once again making the whole idea of being here illegally unattractive and also removing the incentive to come here illegally.
4. He is for Comprehensive Immigration Reform, which in all of it's forms offered up has always been either out-in-out Amnesty, or some forms of back-door amnesty
.
Whereas, Sarah Palin has spoken out forcefully for 2 and 3 (Rick is against 2 and 3) and since E-Verify is wrapped up in 3, she is defact in support of that as well, the only ding I have against her is her (I believe) stated support for Comprehensive Immigration Reform while VP for John McCain, which in my mind, was nothing more than supporting the top of the ticket and which her strong vocal of both AZ1070 and a physical border fence, that would seem to bear out my conclusion.

All of which begs the question, why would you support somebody so weak on border issues?

Are you not a conservative?

[BillM]

And that would be said by whom???

Sarah Palin Quote - “What don’t you understand about ‘illegal’? They have to leave!