Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here's How To Spin The Fact That Scott Brown Won But Stocks Are Selling Off
The Business Insider ^ | 1-20-2010 | Joe Weisenthal

Posted on 01/20/2010 5:45:02 AM PST by blam

Here's How To Spin The Fact That Scott Brown Won But Stocks Are Selling Off

Joe Weisenthal

Jan. 20, 2010, 7:03 AM

It's obvious, because as we pointed out last night, contrary to expectations, futures are heading south following the shock election of a Massachusetts Republican to the Senate.

Actually, not really.

But you did have the likes of Cramer predicting that a Brown victory -- because it would produce legislative gridlock -- would be good for stocks.

So the obvious rejoinder (if you're Cramer, or someone in his camp) is that the Scott Brown rally happened yesterday -- after all, everyone saw it coming, and that's all CNBC could really talk about -- and that today is just a sell-the-news kinda day.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Campaign News
KEYWORDS: brown; djia; markets; politics

1 posted on 01/20/2010 5:45:04 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
Obviously the markets have already estimated the probabilities of a variety of actions and discounted them appropriately, raising stock prices in some cases, and dropping them in the dumper in other cases.

The market average is a dirivative of the two functions.

Lo and behold, the markets have once again perceived the situation with perfect foresight! (NOT).

2 posted on 01/20/2010 5:48:01 AM PST by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I think it’s because those who were bouying the market to give people the impression that zero was a success are now selling to punish us for doing a bad thing.


3 posted on 01/20/2010 5:49:06 AM PST by 1raider1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
But you did have the likes of Cramer predicting that a Brown victory -- because it would produce legislative gridlock -- would be good for stocks.

Stocks bounced 60% with an all democrat congress, house and senate (60 votes) from March 2009 to now...

4 posted on 01/20/2010 5:50:02 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
For those who think the Healthcare industry is AGAINST Obamacare, you better look at how much money they plowed into Congress to shape that monstrosity. If Healthcare stocks sell off, it'll be because of the potential for Obamacare to fail.

Kinda like industries betting on Cap'n Trade.
5 posted on 01/20/2010 5:55:06 AM PST by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1raider1
I think it’s because those who were bouying the market to give people the impression that zero was a success are now selling to punish us for doing a bad thing.

BINGO!

6 posted on 01/20/2010 5:55:43 AM PST by alicewonders (Sarah Palin is the face of America's future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1raider1

Hmmm,,,,its all in the reporting. For a stock to trade, there has to be someone to sell and also someone to buy. So the “sale” cant just come out of thin air. The stock doesnt just go into a bucket in the corner. The seller sells because he gets money from someone. This is reported like there is no buyer.


7 posted on 01/20/2010 5:57:53 AM PST by Concho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
Gridlock in Washington D.C.
IS A GOOD THING..... benefiting the voters instead of government workers..
Call it triage... or plugging the arterys of lifes blood..
8 posted on 01/20/2010 5:59:47 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I’ll give points for one of the silliest headlines I’ve seen in a while.


9 posted on 01/20/2010 6:00:44 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The futures are down because some of the banks’ earnings didn’t meet expectations.


10 posted on 01/20/2010 6:04:00 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117
"The futures are down because some of the banks’ earnings didn’t meet expectations."

Yup.

U.S. Stock Futures Signal Dip; Banks Earnings Eyed

Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:36am EST

* U.S. stock index futures pointed to a lower open on Wall Street on Wednesday, with futures for the S&P 500 SPc1 down 0.38 percent, Dow Jones DJc1 futures down 0.37 percent and Nasdaq 100 NDc1 futures down 0.48 percent at 1018 GMT.

* Investors were bracing for a flurry of earnings from financial majors such as Bank of America (BAC.N), Morgan Stanley (MS.N) and Wells Fargo (WFC.N).

[snip]

11 posted on 01/20/2010 6:15:34 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam

Anticipating rough sledding for the bill, the S&P health-care sector stock index surged by more than 2% Tuesday, leading all other industry sectors, with managed-care stocks posting strong gains.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2432982/posts


12 posted on 01/20/2010 6:18:42 AM PST by Between the Lines (For their sins of 50 million abortions God gave them over to be an ObamaNation {Romans 1:24-32})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Buy on the rumor, sell on the news.
13 posted on 01/20/2010 6:20:29 AM PST by bereanway (Sarah get your gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Less Obvious Consequences of the Massachusetts Election

by: Bruce Krasting
January 20, 2010

I was watching the election results from Mass. with some people who know history better than I. None of us could come up with a historical parallel to the development that took place last evening. This one is going to go down as one of those ‘watershed’ events that you hear about.

The TV guys are all talking about what this could mean to the health care legislation. At this point, I could care less. I thought it was dead before and I think it is deader now. What I care about is what this means for some of the other significant issues that we face.

In my opinion the vote in Mass was a vote against the status quo. It was a loud enough vote for everyone in D.C. to hear. If there was any doubt that Americans are sick of the "same old, same old", this was it. The message was clear to me, “If you want to keep your job as an elected official you have to do things differently.” This will force changes across the board. Some things outside of health care that I think may be impacted:

[snip]

14 posted on 01/20/2010 6:24:31 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bereanway
If you are putting money down and base it on events like this you're just gambling, not investing.
15 posted on 01/20/2010 6:28:07 AM PST by Recon Dad ( USMC SSgt Patrick O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 92)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam

DJI opens to a 90 point drop.


16 posted on 01/20/2010 6:35:09 AM PST by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The market went up yesterday in anticipation of his election — buy on the rumor, sell on the news. This isn’t surprising.


17 posted on 01/20/2010 8:21:17 AM PST by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alicewonders; 1raider1

The insider cronies who are part of whatever formal/informal PPT acting on behalf of the left is not interested in us at all. They are in the market to make money. They had profits; they took them. That’s all.

Brown’s win signaled a game change. Best to take your money off the table, keep your profits and study the situation so as to find the next best bet.

No one knows right now just what is going to happen vis-a-vis policy. However, the dollar rose, gold and oil fell, the past two days, even though they were opposite sorts of days in the stock market. Speculative ag commodities also mainly fell, even though there is inflation in food prices.

I have no idea what this means in the long term. I am still out of the market, for the time being. I know it has increased. I have been tempted to get back in several times. But I cannot trust much of the information available and, personally, I am just not equipped to trade quickly in and out on my own and I am not paying someone who may or may not know what they are doing another dime in management fees.

YMMV


18 posted on 01/20/2010 1:26:02 PM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson